"Telstar Electronics" wrote...
On Aug 29, 11:37 pm, " Peter" wrote:
Some UK shops can now find out how this wonder
product can "double the power" of FM CB radios.
I'll bet you didn't know that you can double the power
of an FM transmitter with a speech processor, huh?

Stop talking nonsense... we both know that the doubling
of power refers only to AM(DSB) signals.

The claims are not aimed at you and I, they are aimed
at CB enthusiasts without technical knowledge or
experience to know the truth.

By making "double your power" claims of "any CB", without
clearly stating that it will not apply to FM CB, you are
misleading the British consumer.
The only possible reason you could have for making those
claims within the UK, or not telling UK consumers that it
does not apply to their CB, is to purposely mislead in an
attempt to boost sales on a false promise.


Naturally, I would hope that I could convince either you
or the shops to drop the false claims within the UK, making
it clear that there is no power gain for FM.
But if not, do the words "Trading Standards" or "Ofcom"
mean anything to you?


However, don't discount the fact that VoiceMax can
increase the usable range of an FM transmitter as well...

And we cannot discount the fact that FM CB is not the
same as broadcast radio. The 10KHz spacing was never
intended for high quality sound, and will not allow it
without splatter.

UK FM CBs are designed, made and tested to do the best
within the available bandwidth. This includes receiver
specifications.
You cannot polish a turd. FM with just 10KHz spacing
is very much a turd.

Like I keep telling you, we have had FM CB for 25 years. We
have had the amps and processors... and the splatter that
goes with them.
I have also worked on many UK CB radios over the years,
and have never needed a speech processor to get better
modulation over distance.


Regards,
Peter.

Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio?
Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within
the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in
providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter
operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on
microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the
transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly
depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a
typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to
the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range.

Other Processors Have a Problem...
Other speech processors use a low-cost "audio clipping" approach to
achieve compression. While this method is economical for the
manufacturer, clipping distorts the original signal and sounds fuzzy
on the air. What these types of audio processors gain in volume, they
lose in voice intelligibility.

VoiceMax is Different...
VoiceMax uses a sophisticated AGC (Automatic Gain Control) circuit
that installs inside your transceiver to hold the audio level
constant, with less than 1% harmonic distortion. No "clipping" type
processor can come close to this low distortion level. Whether you're
whispering or shouting, VoiceMax holds your transceiver at 100%
modulation allowing you to punch through heavy channel traffic without
sacrificing voice clarity. VoiceMax incorporates a feature not offered
on other processors. The adjustable noise gate allows the user to
block unwanted ambient background sounds. This feature is especially
helpful in mobile environments where wind and road noise can be an
issue. VoiceMax works with your non-amplified dynamic microphone to
give you tremendous audio punch without all the background noise
associated with power microphones.

www.telstar-electronics.com

"Telstar Electronics" ignored
the facts, preferring to post his unproven CB voodoo...

Griffter voodoo snipped


Ill take that standard spam message as another "guilty" plea: That
you know the claims will mislead potential customers, but you only
care about trying to sell your outdated product.


Regards,
Peter.

On Sep 8, 11:30 pm, " Peter" wrote:
the facts, preferring to post his unproven CB voodoo...

You seems to like the word voodoo... lol
www.telstar-electronics.com

"Telstar Electronics" wrote...

You seems to like the word voodoo... lol

And you don't appear to like answering technical or
tricky questions.

Here's one for you:
Is your VoiceMax RoHS compliant?

Or maybe you believe that a customer or dealer does
not need to know whether a product is legal.



Regards,
Peter.

"Freddy the Destroyer" wrote...
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:17:38 +0100, " Peter"

Here's one for you:
Is your VoiceMax RoHS compliant?

Or maybe you believe that a customer or dealer does
not need to know whether a product is legal.

Great... Another stupid, socialist Brit...

Why, because I believe that a customer has the right
to know about the product they are buying?
You think that makes me a socialist?

Maybe all the products in all the shops should be in
plain black, unmarked boxes - be cause wanting to
know details of what we are buying makes us a
stupid socialist... huh?

Don't forget, it was Griffter who first mentioned the
legal requirement. He suggested that my Web site
needs to meet the standard (which was incorrect),
knowing that his product does not.
Does that make him a "stupid socialist", as well as
a hypocrite?

Maybe you need to take a look at an English dictionary.

The person who doesn't want to know before parting
with their money is the supid one.

Who ****ing cares?

Those who get ripped off may care.
The CB shops in this country do not sell illegal CB equipment,
because they know what happens... from experience.

The law in this country appears to go heavier on someone
selling an illegal (even if harmless) product than it does
on paedophiles (who may get off with community hours
or a telling off).

It may be a crap system, but people and dealers should
at least be informed if something is not legal.


Are you still ****ed about your great great grandad

Never knew him.

getting his ass kicked in the war?

Which one, humans versus Dinosaurs?
Bloody hell, OM, who f'kin cares?


Regards,
Peter.

"Freddy the Destroyer" wrote...
" Peter" wrote:

Are you still ****ed about your great great grandad
getting his ass kicked in the war?

Which one, humans versus Dinosaurs?
Bloody hell, OM, who f'kin cares?

Obviously you do, Peter.

WRONG.
It was YOU who mentioned some war, please do try to keep up.

Now shut the fark up.

With all due respect, as little as that may be, no.


Peter.