From: Frank Gilliland
Group: rec.radio.cb
Subject: Skullcracka Deadkey question. Date: =A0=A0 Sat, Jul 19,
2003, 8:33pm (EDT-3) X-Trace: corp.newsgroups.com 1058672005
216.64.140.207 (19 Jul 2003 22:33:25 -0500
)I was at a seminar today from 7:30am to

4:30pm.

fat asshole in the back row that talked way too
loud for the room, sounded like Bill Murry in

Caddyshack, and felt the need to share the life
story of both him and his messed-up family.

We broke for lunch, and after eating I strolled

out into the parking lot for a smoke. That's

when I saw that middle-aged retard cornering

two barely-legal girls and bragging about how

he walks on cell-phones and televisions with

his 1400 watt CB mobile. The girls made an

excuse to leave and almost ran away. What a

perfect example of a keyclown.
_
What is "Barely" legal? It's either legal or not,,,,"barely legal" is
like a a"little bit" pregnant and illustrates the biases you can barely
contain...you appear jealous as hell, nothing more.


If the clown-shoe fits....

LOL..Touche!!!!
=A0=A0For an example of what you profess to be a "clown-shoe", one needs
look no further than an N3CVJ post where he claimed illegally listening
to teenage girls telephone conversations about sex provides him with
"juicy" entertainment. What a freak!! He shouldn't be allowed within 50
yards of a minor!! Seems this guy you refer to was Mr. Rogers compared
to Davie Hall,,,,this guy wasn't breaking the law at all, Davie was.
This guy just drew out your jealousy. This guy was messing with adults,
as per your claim. Davie was messing around with minors, claiming it
provided him with a "juicy" pleasure. Need to see his post, frankie? Go
ahead and comment on Davie's preferred and self-stated predilection of
finding juicy "pleasure" in the sex talk of minors. Take your angry
biased ass home and soak your head. LOL. If you;re looking for someone
to bash over minors, bash Davie,,he's right here and you don;t have to
seek him out..besides,,as was stated, the guy's behavior you took
offense with was legal,,Davie is not. Figures you would have a problem
with the legal dude and go to bat for Davie and his entertainment
derived through the disgusting paractice of illegal monitoring minor
girls telehone calls. Perhaps you have more in common with Davie than
originally thought. What else would explain you taking issue with a
legal act and giving Hall a pass when he talks of such demented,
disgusting, preverted acts.