Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In MPETa.130872$Ph3.16923@sccrnsc04, "CBer" wrote:
"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message .. . In , "CBer" wrote: Mabry you need to read what I said again, IN CBs there is NO audio clipper ( look into a FM transmitter circuit and see if one of those are found inside a CB, NOT. ) it just a feed back circuit that controls the modulation level by using a AGC audio circuit, and that is what the techs cut out. You are right, most of them do use an AGC (AMC) system. Regardless, they are there for a reason -- they prevent overmodulation while maintaining the dynamic range of the modulating speech. Disabling the circuit will most definately cause overmodulation. BTW, Mabry is back with the Mariner's again. In my reference the audio clippers does clip the audio in a symmetrical way that sounds Good with out over modulation. The AMC circuits are not symmetrical? And unless you happen to have a sampling o-scope on the bench, how do you know you aren't overmodulating? You don't, and you most likely are, especially when "LOUD" is your primary objective. I did not say anything about symmetrical IN a AM AMC circuit only in the FM circuit. You said to put the FM clipper in an AM radio to sound loud; "Put in a mic circuit like is used in FM equiment...." So how is it symmetrical in an FM radio and not an AM radio? How is an AGC circuit -not- symmetrical? Or is it like your clipper that is only symmetrical in an FM radio? For as saying CB want to be Loud and Swing is a kick . Maybe to a moron or a small child. I guess you do not get it, I HATE THE TERM SWING, and LOUD I think its STUPTED OK. That seems to contradict your previous statement: "For as saying CB want to be Loud and Swing is a kick ." Read the other post first before jumping. Open up the CBs as of today and compare it to other radios in the other fields, they are being in technology, To BIG, no good engineering in them, just old circuits that everybody in china has copied, and the same old cap. That's because AM is old technology. Read MY other post before jumping -- radio is a method of communication. It is not an amusement park for morons, and not a therapy room for unsocialized misfits whom people ignore in normal conversation. If you want to be 'LOUD', distort your voice, and add cool sound effects, get an audio effects box like a MidiVerb and plug it into your stereo. If you want to be heard, say something that people want to hear instead of forcing your idiotic and thoughtless rhetoric on them with screaming, splatter and 'swang'. Because otherwise, the only people you are impressing are other morons like yourself. Just because AM is a old technology doesn't mean that it can't use newer style parts with some improvements in the circuit design and a smaller BOX. And they have made plenty of improvements over the years. Starting with tube circuits and point-to-point wiring, moving on to PCBs, semiconductors, integrated circuits and PLLs, and many even have seperate processors for frequency control and audio processing. Compare the size and weight of the old whiteface Johnson Messenger or the Lafayette HE-20 to that of any modern radios, and if you can't tell the difference then try dropping both of them on your feet. And don't forget that this is CB radio -- it ain't NASA, SETI, military or commercial trunking, HDTV, cell-phone networking, or even amateur radio. CB is about one step above a child's walkie-talkie, using modulation methods that are older than your great-grandpappy. So how much technology do you need? Or do you just want some hi-tech stuff in your CB radio because 'hi-tech' is cool? Here's a new technical term for you: PLP, or Peak Learning Power. It is defined as the highest point on the learning curve that a person is able to achieve. People with a low PLP never seem to understand that "power" isn't how many watts you have, it's how you -control- those watts; and it's not how "LOUD" you are, it's how you -control- your speech. Even Twisty understands that much. Like I said before, get a clue. Do you want to impress people? Prove that your PLP wasn't maxed out by the concepts of "LOUD" and "swang". I have a term , IHFMTYWEL. I have forgot more than you will ever learn. That's obvious. Try to jog your memory a bit, eh? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yaesu FT-8900R Tx/Fx Modification | Equipment | |||
Modification of G5RV - need help on this | Antenna | |||
Yaesu FT-8900R Tx/Fx Modification | Equipment | |||
FA: Collins Modification & Service Manual | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Collins Modification & Service Manual | Boatanchors |