LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old September 6th 03, 04:55 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In , Dave Hall wrote:

snip
While there is no doubt that eavesdropping on private conversations is illegal


Actually, that's not entirely true. First off, when this "incident"
occured, it was before the passage of the ECPA....


Eavesdropping on private conversations is indeed illegal. The difference is that
because older cordless phones didn't use any encryption, any conversation using
them cannot be legally defined as private. The cordless phone freqs were, in
effect, party lines. The owner's manuals emphasized this fact, and it's too bad
that people didn't read those things (then or now).

snip
But some people's stupidity, are other people's entertainment..... ;-)


Twisty's stupidity is my entertainment!!!






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
N3CVJ asks for PROOF! Proof it is.. Twistedhed CB 9 August 29th 03 02:21 AM
R U talking? Scott Unit 69 CB 2 August 7th 03 09:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017