wrote in message ...
"Landshark" . wrote:
If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then
make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't
real, no defamation.

All this chatter about A's website, and yet no linkage!?!?

http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/

--
GO #40

LOL!!! Sounds like to much natural
gas?????????

Landshark



--
Try these to learn about newsgroup trolls.

http://www.io.com/~zikzak/troll_thesis.html
http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm

"Landshark" . wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Landshark" . wrote:
If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then
make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't
real, no defamation.

All this chatter about A's website, and yet no linkage!?!?

http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/

--
GO #40

LOL!!! Sounds like to much natural
gas?????????

Landshark

That's what the old lady will say around 2 am or so. lol

I've got a fairly easy day tomorrow, mostly estimates. I
might wash it down with a Rolling Rock too. peeeeuuu!

10-4 (on topic now)

--
GO #40

"Landshark" . wrote:
Time for me to hit the hay. 5am and then
take the Bronco back to the body shop to
finish it up. Got it running, new interior,
new paint, new seals, glass etc etc ready
to rock.

Landshark

Sounds good, Shark. We can decide where the antenna goes
next week.

--
GO #40

In , "Landshark"
. wrote:

snip
If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then
make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't
real, no defamation.

Would you please explain that to Twisty? She seems to have a real problem with
such simple concepts.





-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Landshark wrote:

BINGO!!!!!!!


So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about
you that isn't true, should you:

A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much",
thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers?


If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then
make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't
real, no defamation.

I'm not sure that a legal case would be winnable, given the relative
anonymity of the internet.


B. Ignore it, and then have it implied that it must be true since no one
ever denied it?


Really? I thought it was inocent until proven
guilty, if it's not true, why worry.


That only applies in a court of law, not the court of public opinion.

But your point is well taken. It would seem that the people who complain
the loudest must be bothered by something, or had a nerve struck. In
this case, silence really is golden. Leave them guess.


Dave
"Sandbagger"

jim wrote in :

agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung
on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers?

Certainly not me. I usually don't even read the mudslinging posts.



--
Alan Strawinski

http://alan.strawinski.net

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , "Landshark"
. wrote:
snip
If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation,
but since he isn't real, no defamation.
_
Would you please explain that to Twisty? She

seems to have a real problem with such

simple concepts.

_
LOL...what I believe is no one's problems but yours, Hall's, and Nad's.

"Curious Dan" wrote:
wrote in message
...

You shouldnt eat steak this late Moped, it isnt good for your figure.

I know, I get kinda gassy after...my wife said the same thing too.

Too late though, it's almost done..i just have to kick it up
a notch..

--
GO #40

Ill tell you what you did that almost as good as Emril

BAM!!

--
GO #40

Alan Strawinski wrote:
jim wrote in :

agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being
slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers?

Certainly not me. I usually don't even read the mudslinging posts.

I only like positive thoughts.

--
GO #40

Dave Hall wrote:
Landshark wrote:

BINGO!!!!!!!


So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site
about you that isn't true, should you:

A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too
much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers?


If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then
make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't
real, no defamation.

I'm not sure that a legal case would be winnable, given the relative
anonymity of the internet.

Right! Who's Aaron?

http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/

--
GO #40