On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:01:15 -0600, Neil Down
wrote:


Below are your posts inculding the words gay, cock swallower, etc you
have made quite an impression under your new screen name other than that
it is still the same gay ****... lol

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=30
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=75346dc4d85352e6dff08e9712ad5820%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=31


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=30
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=e0f5652f64d986a8092c57bfa418e029%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=32

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=20
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3a7cf648ff9e06445f06c886f369ecfe%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=26


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=10
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=8359dc0440380a5bf0faf3246f94feaa%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=18

Should we now list yours WA3MOJ?

That list would take hours to read.

Lancer wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:01:15 -0600, Neil Down
wrote:

Below are your posts inculding the words gay, cock swallower, etc you
have made quite an impression under your new screen name other than that
it is still the same gay ****... lol

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=30
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=75346dc4d85352e6dff08e9712ad5820%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=31


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=30
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=e0f5652f64d986a8092c57bfa418e029%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=32

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=20
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3a7cf648ff9e06445f06c886f369ecfe%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=26


http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...r.web&start=10
&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=8359dc0440380a5bf0faf3246f94feaa%
40news.teranews.com&rnum=18

Should we now list yours WA3MOJ?

That list would take hours to read.

Heh, which nym?

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:01:15 -0600, Neil Down
wrote:

lancer wrote in news:3fa9161e.8217185
:


Exactly twsitedhed and company blow a gasket when you call them illegal
or criminals.

And you blow a gasket when you call Doug the same thing.

I DON'T CALL dOUG ANYTHING QUIT SLOBBERING ON THE KEYBOARD.


So I made a mistake and typed you instead of we, big deal.

At least I know when my caps locks are ON.

Steveo wrote:

Neil Down wrote:

I DON'T CALL dOUG ANYTHING


He must be your friend, you respond to anything about him.


QUIT SLOBBERING ON THE KEYBOARD.


Quit harassing CBer's.

That's about all they are good for.

On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:27:51 -0600, Neil Down
wrote:

Steveo wrote in news:20031104182715.587
:



In the mean time, he flames rec.radio.cb. Calls people all kinds
of filthy names, with mostly gay references. (wonder why the closet
walkie talkie operator hasn't come out in the open yet).

Now some jackass who claims to be an extra is defending him?

BAH!

Talk about a jackass you defend a blatant transexual, a liar, and several
illegal federal criminals. Your a real saint huh?

Now when has Steve defended you and Doug?

JJ wrote:
Steveo wrote:

Neil Down wrote:

I DON'T CALL dOUG ANYTHING


He must be your friend, you respond to anything about him.


QUIT SLOBBERING ON THE KEYBOARD.


Quit harassing CBer's.

That's about all they are good for.

That, and giving ham radio a bad example. Two bad apples
don't spoil the whole bunch. ;)

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Neil Down wrote:
Steveo wrote in news:20031104182715.587
:


In the mean time, he flames rec.radio.cb. Calls people all kinds
of filthy names, with mostly gay references. (wonder why the closet
walkie talkie operator hasn't come out in the open yet).

Now some jackass who claims to be an extra is defending him?

BAH!

Talk about a jackass you defend a blatant transexual, a liar, and several
illegal federal criminals. Your a real saint huh?

WHO are these people? ($ to Jerry)

LOL!!!!!

He's a troll, nothing more, a whole
lot less.

Landshark


--
You can stand tall without standing on someone. You can be a victor without having victims.

jim wrote in message
...


Brenda Ann wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...



actually a good point. if i were to use the freq's the u.s. gov said i
can
then what is the problem with slipping +/- 5kc's between 'channels'? is
that freebanding?


The frequencies that the US govt. says you can are those specific
frequencies that constitute the 40 standard CB channels. The distance
away
from the center of any channel is tightly regulated, and you can't be
more
than 0.005% away from that center (~1.3 KHz), which is actually pretty
broad
when compared to say, broadcast AM, which is only allowed a 20 Hz
leeway).


that is what the u.s. gov proclaims. my point is they have no say so
outside territorial waters. whether or not the gov abides by itu
standards on this matter is open.

The fact is the US Govt HAS signed on with ITU and honors *most* treaties.


better yet, who the hell is the u.s. gov to tell me what is legal or
not?


If you are a US citizen, they are granted that right by the
constitution,
and by treaty.


please point out the constitutional section you mentioned.

Title 47, US Code and The Communications Act of 1934 voted upon by
Congress.

if i were to float out to bermuda and xmit would i be freebanding

there?

Sure, but I doubt the British authorities would appreciate that!


You would then be under the jurisdiction of whatever radio authority
covers
Bermuda. Aren't they a British colony? The UK Radio Authority is much
more
harsh than the FCC.


Agreed.
right, the RA is tough. easier to monitor 65+/- million than appr 300
million

do our friends to the north and south really care what the fcc

says what americans can/cannot do? not likely....

WRT to "freebanding" within the US and its territories, all I can say is to
go
ahead and do it. If you get popped, you have only yourself to blame.

J


Actually, yes. The treaties for use of various frequencies are there to
protect all the various countries that are signatories to them. The
Canadians are pretty hard on pirates (though they also have some rules
in
place to give greater latitude on some bands than we do). I don't know
what
communications law is like in Mexico, but I imagine that they deal with
people operating out of band/off channel too.


treaties not withstanding have you heard 10 & 11 meters recently? the
developing world is looking for the cheapest way to communicate with
their expatriates (sp?) in the u.s. one way to do it is using a setup
that after an initial outlay for equipment is basically free. their
problem is propagation not the gov.

(wonder why the closet
walkie talkie operator hasn't come out in the open yet).


Because if you hide in the closet when you jam the
repeater with your HT, no one can find you!!!

Radioman wrote:
(wonder why the closet
walkie talkie operator hasn't come out in the open yet).

Because if you hide in the closet when you jam the
repeater with your HT, no one can find you!!!

Your dogie might..