On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with
that nym.

Steveo wrote:

moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with
that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams used the word punk?
Must be a New Hampshire thing.

From: (Lancer)
Steveo wrote:
moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:
Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever to
Usenet, in this or any group.
That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before, that's
not grounds for being a punk to me.
**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams

used the word punk? Must be a New

Hampshire thing.
_
Not at all. Try Pa. This time, you're way off the mark.

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:04:51 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Lancer)
Steveo wrote:
moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:
Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever to
Usenet, in this or any group.
That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before, that's
not grounds for being a punk to me.
**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams

used the word punk? Must be a New

Hampshire thing.
_
Not at all. Try Pa. This time, you're way off the mark.


Where do you see PA? look at the message ID.

From: (Lancer)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:04:51 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Lancer)
Steveo wrote:
moistrous wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2003
13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote: Especially when it appears to be
'moisterous's' first post ever to Usenet, in this or any group.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams

used the word punk? Must be a New

Hampshire thing.
_
Not at all. Try Pa. This time, you're way off the mark.

Where do you see PA? look at the message

ID.


I tried looking at again, but Gotham City won't allow me in right
now,,,damn webtv definitely has it's moments!

Lancer wrote:
Steveo wrote:

moistrous wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:

Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever
to Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you. So i've never posted here before,
that's not grounds for being a punk to me.

**** off, blowhard. You've never posted in any group with
that nym.

Did you notice how Willard "Blake" Williams used the word punk?
Must be a New Hampshire thing.

Honestly, I didn't just fall off the Rolling Rock truck yesterday.

From: (moistrous)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:12:38 +0000, Steveo wrote:
Especially when it appears to be 'moisterous's' first post ever to
Usenet, in this or any group.

That's Mr. Moistrous to you.

Not among these pages, shall that ever be the case.

So i've never posted here before, that's not

grounds for being a punk to me.

You posted with a bogus email address and you came out cursing. My guess
is you're a troll that was likely relegated to a new supernews account
who just had their last ISP canned for noncompliance of TOS, and my
thoughts are usually 99% dead-on accurate, thanks to all my friends in
this group who lend tons of support and play some of the lessers like
cheap fiddles. If I'm wrong, you'll be around for awhile and my
apologies will go out to you,,,but,,,I don't think I am....there is no
reason to post without a valid email address unless you're A) looking to
start something or B) hiding.
Spam is not a valid defense, as many have creatively figured out a
manner in which to display their email addy while fooling the spam
bots.,,,you're not one of them.

Whoops! My apologies. You're a *new* registrant with kosmokrator.




Twisted the Pantokrator

(Twistedhed) wrote:
Whoops! My apologies. You're a *new* registrant with kosmokrator.

Twisted the Pantokrator

The fornicator?