Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now, but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as the ARRL reported, so good bye!!! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Troll
|
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course it is.
Dan/W4NTI "JOE" wrote in message ... Troll |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Where will we go?
We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-) Steve w8an Old School wrote: Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now, but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as the ARRL reported, so good bye!!! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:36:29 -0500, S-Man
wrote: Where will we go? We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-) Steve w8an Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then what is the problem? Old School wrote: Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now, but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as the ARRL reported, so good bye!!! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Old School" wrote in message ... Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then what is the problem? Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for them. Charles Brabham, N5PVL |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article m, Charles Brabham
says... "Old School" wrote in message .. . Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then what is the problem? Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for them. Charles Brabham, N5PVL Did you take the dumded down test moron? Its assholes like you who ruin the hobby. I'm an idiot |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:52:16 GMT, "Charles Brabham"
wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then what is the problem? Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for them. Charles Brabham, N5PVL In what way? I cant be anti ham if I am one! Code or not! kf6foz |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:52:16 GMT, "Charles Brabham"
wrote: "Old School" wrote in message .. . Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then what is the problem? Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for them. Charles Brabham, N5PVL Come on Charles, he's not nearly as rude as you have been with your anti-Internet rants. He's just asking a simple question that I would like to hear your answer for. Bob McConnell N2SPP |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 04:03:56 GMT, Bob McConnell
wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:52:16 GMT, "Charles Brabham" wrote: "Old School" wrote in message . .. Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then what is the problem? Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for them. Charles Brabham, N5PVL Come on Charles, he's not nearly as rude as you have been with your anti-Internet rants. He's just asking a simple question that I would like to hear your answer for. Bob McConnell N2SPP You are a bad guy now too Bob just for replying. But that is all I asked for was a simple answer. It seems Dan, Bruce and Charles want to avoid a serious answer by doing the run-around. kf6foz |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Internet radio will "arrive" this year | Broadcasting | |||
Re; Where will you CW'rs go when the NO-CODERS arrive? | Policy | |||
No Heaven for CW coders | Policy | |||
No Heaven for CW coders | Policy | |||
No Heaven for CW coders | Policy |