| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#91
February 19th 04, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#93
February 19th 04, 06:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#94
February 19th 04, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#95
February 19th 04, 07:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Twistedhed) begged for attention by writing: Freedom is participation in power - Cicero Twisty, it's obvious that you Kant comprehend freedom at all. But I can be educated,,you'll always be a liar. Your claim,,,,,,how long has your ISP outsourced to Colorado from Washington? LOL... Can't touch this! The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong |
|
#96
February 19th 04, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#97
February 19th 04, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#98
February 19th 04, 08:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In , after frantically
searching for any shred of evidence to back up his claim that I am five different hams, (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) In , (Twistedhed) begged for attention by writing: Freedom is participation in power - Cicero Twisty, it's obvious that you Kant comprehend freedom at all. But I can be educated,,you'll always be a liar. Your claim,,,,,,how long has your ISP outsourced to Colorado from Washington? LOL... Oh god, here we go again.... ok, who do you think I am -this- week, Twisty? A ham in Colorado? And what distorted, barely relevant piece of information are you going to post as definitive proof -this- time? Have you tried this link yet? http://www.antionline.com/tools-and-...216.64.140.205 -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#99
February 19th 04, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) while under the influence of constipation, felt compelled to attack against every little nuance that induces thought other than his own, damaged his delicate self-esteem and wrote: Then shut up already. LOL...now,,about your claim that your ISP outsources to Colorado..... Actually, I think newsfeeds.com is out of North Dakota, but I'm willing to be entertained with whatever trivial information you have discovered while pursuing your obsession with me. I am Twistedhed*, who has written great things..that you don't understand! If people talk about art, they mean me, not you, crawling, nibbling worms who should be crushed under my foot! *Schubert Franz Schubert 1797-1828 Where's Peter the Hypocrite and his copyright cops? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#100
February 19th 04, 09:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:29:26 -0500 (EST), (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Dave=A0Hall) On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST), (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (Dave=A0Hall) On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST), (Twistedhed) wrote: From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George) (Twistedhed) wrote: N3CVJ said Let's see....N3CVJ wrote: I'm hardly around much these days =A0=A0 In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post the other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan. I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know what you're talking about. Tut-tut,,you most certainly have a "pal" in Michigan.....you even claimed you were "intimately" familiar with N8WWM's behavior and repeater jamming activity so if it wasn't your Michigan bud who made you "intimately" aware of the happenings that YOU felt important ebough to bring to this forum for discussion,,,,,then who? You're on drugs again. "Again"? LOL,,you're reaching so far with desperation you reduced yourself to making false implications that I have indulged in narcotics. 185 pounds of twisted steel and sex appeal. No smoking, no drinking, no drugs. I'm in better shape now than I ever was...but what is important here, is your desperation resulting in malcious, unfounded attacks meant to inflame. I know nothing about Doug's activities. I'm going to give you a chance to clear your foggy head... You're confusing me with Leland. No,,I'm not. Second chance.... Like I said before, you need to keep better track of your objects of admiration. Hoo-boy,,,ok,,,so when I repost your claim about having info on Doug,,,what shall we chalk your continued denials up to, Dave?..... Drugs? Your little posse came to me Dave, not the other way around. You really need to keep better track of the objects of your obsession . One can understand how illustrating your hypocrisy would be misconstrued by yourself as an "obsession" by another. It's a natural reaction from a non-proactive individual. Did we learn a new word this week? (shrug) Beats me,,I can't even imagine anyone including you as a "we" when speaking, given your past performances on this forum, but I guess your question would hinge on, "Who, in addition to yourself, are you referring as "we"? "Cause the vernacular you appear to be experiencing discomfort over isn't new,,,then again, apparently it is, to yourself. Wouldn't it just be better to say "reactive" rather than "non-proactive"? No. One can be non-proactive without being reactive. Anytime someone regularly pulls up the past quotes of others, which can span many years, goes beyond the bounds of "normal" an into the realm of obsessive compulsive behavior. You've done it a myriad of times over the years, Davie. And you've done so in many a malicous and unprovoked manner. When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that I have little to contribute to the group as it now stands. You always have had the need to reclarify your positions, Dave,,,you're not very clear in your communication skills. I can see why someone of your limited comprehensive ability would see it that way. see, saying you are "not hardly around' is nowhere near the same meaning as saying you have little to contribute.",,but you of course, already know that...otherwise the need wouldn't have existed for you to completely change what you said. To anyone else, who has even the slightest tendency toward a normal personality, it would not be necessary to clarify what should be an obvious statement. But one again your words underscore just how irregular you are. What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"! That's the way you took it. Yes,,as that is exactly what you said.let's see it again, as it is apparently paining you.... I'm hardly around much these days _ They way I meant it should be fairly obvious to anyone else who doesn't have a comprehensive disorder. Yea? Only "anyone" else isn't looking to you for validation........... The way you seem to be. Delusions, Dave, delusions. I merely mentioned you to Geogre WA3MOJ, no malice in the post,,,I didn't even argue with your position,,,I merely quoted you verbatim for Geogre and was called a liar for the effort. I chose to illustrate I did not lie and out you came. Plus,,you were funnin' around anyways,,, _ .....and I don't see "anyone else" coming to your defense who misinterprets "I'm not hardly around these days" to be a synonym for "I have little to contribute" Because no one else care what you think, or what I may waste my time saying back to you. That's pretty funny, Dave. You really believe that you get no defenders because of what I say,,,hmm,,there you go again blaming someone else for your problems, and look who you choose to blame for your lack of support...LOL! But worry not, I'm ending this after this response. You remain unworthy of rational discussion. Yea,,,especially when those discussions are backed with proof of your own posts. The claims are so distant there is no relation at all,,,,except in your mind. Look in the mirror and repeat your previous statement. Why? It won't change what you said to any other meaning. and you're STILL obsessing with me. That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly what one expects. What in any of those quotes do you find hypocritical? Your encouragement of others to break the law when you have cried like a menstruating teen and callously attacked others for the exact same behavior,,,merely giving information. Where have I EVER "encouraged" people to break the law? You can't seem to differentiate the difference between "encouraging" lawless activity, and giving advice to "tread lightly". HAha,,no Dave, you can't...it's what adheres team voob and the self-described cb hating akcgirlz,,,your group can not differentiate between discussion and actions. Now, look in the mirror and repeat your previous statement...hahaha! I have always maintained that certain activities are illegal. But if you are of the mindset that you do not wish to abide by those rules, at least go about it with a little common sense and keep a low profile. This smacks in the face of what you have claimed in the past, Dave,,you're two faced. Not at all to anyone with normal comprehensive skills. Your arrogance at placing yourself above all others, in the manner that you appoint yourself judge and jury of who is worthy of when you choose to be two faced has always been well documented, Dave. I believe this is probably the fourth time you have stated such, yet you still balme others for your personal problems. It's why you're so likeable, Davie. It's one thing to state that a certain activity is illegal It's totally another to acknowledge that the illegal activity exists, and how to be a good neighbor and not be rude, ignorant, and disrespectful while doing it. Same with your internet behavior. There's such a thing as the letter of the law. And there are TOS,,as you found out several times last year. There's another thing called the intent of the law. It is impractical to expect that everyone will always adhere to the letter of the law in all cases. But as long as you keep the intent of the law in mind, you will not be far off the path. Your intent as been harassment, Dave, in many cases. Someone like yourself, that can't even hold onto ISP's for the duration of the initial agreement due to violations, is in no position to preach. Dave, don't preach. You'e been shown that you have broke the law with your Texas Star and your other activities when you were playing high-power cb when you had a cb repair business...but guess what, Dave, no one was a jagoff to you like you were to those in here speaking of the exact same behavior you have participated. I don't expect you to understand this though. Naturally. You;re the one with the self-image problem, otherwise you would have no need to make false accusations in such malicious manners as you frequently do. There's no sense calling attention to yourself by interfering with your neighbors or acting in a disrespectful manner, =A0=A0Agreed, too bad you don't practice what you preach..as that hasn't stopped you from acting in the most blatant disrespectful manner toward others for beahvior you took part in. By calling something what it is? No,,by crying about it on an internet forum and constantly badgering someone for not sharing your point of view with the law. For calling names other than "illegal" for the same beahvior you have engaged. For getting off-topic and attempting to make your topics those of the personal lives of those you were unable to exhibit proper comunication skills..need more? Hey, look, in the beginning, if people were not so quick to deny that what they were doing was in fact breaking federal laws, then there would be no need to keep reminding them (you). Hehehehhe! The fact you are so self-deluded you think such duty is somehow your responsibility is intensely gratifying. If you would 've instead taken the attitude that "yea, I know I break federal law, but I take steps to make sure that I'm not interfering with other people", it would 've been a different story. There you go again, making untrue accusations. I must have really pizzed on your cornflakes for you to harbor such malice that you care not one iota for your own reputation. You have been crying that tune for years, Dave, only there exists no post by me expressing anything other than staying off the hammie bands and professing the virtues of low power dx with the exception of a few recent escapades on 6 and a recent post rubbing Geogres nose in his own fecal droppings. When you flaunt your actions by selectively breaking laws, as some sort of God given As you did, Dave,,you keep acting like you did no wrong when you clearly have done everything you are crying the pansie blues over. "right" in everyone else's face, you essentially make a mockery of our society. LOL,,no Dave,,only disciples of madness actually believe my talking to another country or state on my cb is making a mockery of our society. Winter that bad up there this year, eh Dave? You need some sunshine, OM. Your brain is starting to freeze when you make comments like that.. Those of us who respect the rule and intent of law have a problem with that. And those of us who respect the rules of the internet have a problem with people like yourself and every single one of the lowlifes you have defended in the past for their internet scumbag actions.. which would have the overall effect of painting a big red bullseye on your forehead. So unless you work for Target, that's not a good thing. You've always cringed when your behavior was illustrated, Dave. Who's cringing? You are. The T on your forehead was a twist original long before your bullseye...ask Geogre,,he's so smitten with me and I have made such an impact on his twisted sampled psyche, he takes to quoting me weekly, only he doesn't give me credit, so I let him think he's getting away with something clever or original..I'm like that. You have even taken to quoting me. I suppose that I could look at it as a silent confirmation of the validity of my points. What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence. If that's true, then why do you keep bringing me up in past quotes? Because your PAST is very relevant, as you can not run from it, no matter what you do or say. And I only done it once. But why do you bring my name into a subject which has nothing to do with me? You know good and well why, Dave. And I'm not running from the past, yet you seem to be the only one who just doesn't get it. I've devoted a whole website to documenting the best times that I've had in radio. Many of those activities were somewhat illegal. Had I been busted then, then I would 've taken my lumps like a man, instead of living in a state of denial, and attempting to convince everyone else that what I was doing was anything less than what it was. That's odd,,I have stated that I would most definitely pay the piper should it come down to that,,in fact,,,I believe I said it before you did, and I think you are paraphrasing me, as you enjoyed my article so much....I still must thank Lelnad for the fruits of his labor...looking back to those posts of my article lovingly as we do, we can see I did indeed claim that exact quote, way back in the nineties...imagine that,,,,,and here I sit, twisting my head,,,looking like this. And the funny thing about the past is that most people grow, and mature as time goes on. Those reckless and irresponsible actions we did as teenagers, we cringe about when we're parents ourselves. The fact that I had engaged in illegal CB operation 20 years ago, does not invalidate my right to point it out to others now. No,,it makes you a hypocrite when you still break the law. In fact, your virtues are of illegally monitoring underage girls talk of sex,,,,,so don;t open the "look at me, I'm self-righteous" page with me, it's written in disappearing ink. By your logic then, a parent would have no right to discipline their children for the acts that they themselves engaged in when they were kids. Try to remain on topic and relevant. Again, what you do or don't do, is no *longer' any consequence, in other words,,,your words and actions now are all for naught,,your past behavior tells the entire story, especially when you break your neck trying to change what you plainly said to mean something entirely diffferent,,(snicker). Again, you are the only one who seems to care. =A0 No Dave,,you're the one that leaped on my post and claimed you just "happened to be in the hood" and then I laughed at you and you tried to change what you said. =A0I suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom of letting a sleeping dog alone. But you;re not sleeping, Dave,,,you are up to your usual games and no good,,it's why you lost YET ANOTHER ISP. Here we go again. First of all, what "games" am I allegedly up to? Tut-tut..no questions..I decide the questions, UNTIL,,you answer the ones you refuse,,,you know,,the ones that showed you a lying POS...the ones where you claimed you had info on a cb bust in Philly, then you claimed it was outside Philly, then you ran from the claim in embarrassed frustration. And secondly what action(s) have I engaged in, would result in the loss of an ISP? I have had 2 ISP's in 9 years. That's the long and short of it. And dozens of accesses to the group. I never wasnted any problems with you Dave, adn told you so way back when...you should have heeded the advice you now ask of another when the table has turned, but sure,,,,I can leave it alone, Dave,,,let's see if you can.,,that includes your sock puppets. I have no control on what others do. You should know that. Never claimed anything different. Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic still eluding you? I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect. But what does that have to do with the topic at hand? You are the one that brought up interpretive logic, not I. Take it up with Leland if you have an issue. Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of your own? =A0=A0Sure,,,they were so profound they were responsible for you and the rest of tream voobs downfall (read: snatched ISP's).. Downfall? You mean that many of us got so tired of the childish homosexual banter and ad-hominem attacks that we gave up posting? No,,I mean several of you were with accesses and after a certain abuse reporting was CONFIRMED your accesses suddnely disappeared,,in fact,there was a rash of lids, in a short manner, losing their accesses,,but we pretend they were trying out new ones and weren't happy with several of them....you understand,,dealing with damaged psyches and all, don't ya' Dave! The fact that you seem to think that ISP's were lost as a direct result of actions on this newsgroup, underscores your either blatant ignorance of internet rules, or is an example of the excessive self-aggandizing of your relative importance in the grand scheme of things. Not at all. Dogie lost several. That must be one f*** of a case of "ignorance" you got going on. Do you always base your principles on the quotes of others? No,,they arent my principles,,they are yours,,and eveyone knows I am world champion of returning things to whence they came. Whatever you think Walter Mitty. I'm not the one with imagined status and an imagined duty to lash out at all I do not comprehend...you are Davie. It would be helpful though, that when you "return" things, that you return them to the proper people, and in the original context. I understand that this may be beyond your capability. Tell ya' what,,, I call your bluff, as always,,you go first, and we'll see your results,,then I'll pull a rabbit out of the magic hat. Your move, Davie. What's that they say about imitation being the highest form of flattery? Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL! If the shoe fits, Cinderella...... You can refer to a man as a woman all you wish,,it won;t help what ails you. True. I can't reverse the affects of getting older. That will come in handy when I post your claims about knowing intimate details concerning N8. I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't want to wake up one morning and see you camped out on my doorstep...... You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave. I don't expect you to understand, but trust me, You're a proven liar, Dave, and liars can not be trusted, so no, you will not be trusted. No one with any credibility had proven anything with respect to my truthfulness. Too bad for you, you have no say in who has credibility on the net. Twistin' the night away... YOU have attempted in the past to twist my words to fit your own self contrived opinion. No. In fact, I have posted your own words verbatim many times and here come Davie to chnege the meaning of what he posted,,,,always with the disclaimer "BUT WHAT I MEANT WAS..." Yawn. That would hardly pass as "proof" in any venue which attempts to preserve an ounce of credibility. .. Credibility is backing what you say...this is where our problem with me began..you made a claimmmyou brought a relevant claim to this group,,,a bull**** claim,,,you knew it, I knew it, and everyone else that knows how to access information knew it. For some reason,, you chose to expand on this lie you told and as with all lies, you were required to tell more to support the original lie. It got too hot for you when I demanded any type proof at all your claim existed, you went offtopic, attacking me, getting personal, and became a jagoff for no reason. You lied, were called on it, and your excuse, (as always) for not substantiating your claim,,,had me as your reason. Credibility? Make us all laugh, Davie. ....now, you can continue to choose to attack the messenger as has been your specialty, and continue to play the victim after initiating rabid attacks, but you will never get away with it again. When the "messenger" has repeatedly demonstrated psychological disorders which And the everpresent self-elevated status. Not only have your delusions annointed yourself with the power of world radio cop, but a graduate of an accredited medical school, in addition : )...hahhahah! affect their ability to distinguish what is considered proper behavior, then they become fair game for disclosure of said dysfunctions. Yes, you have admitted many times your discrimination and penchant for the handicapped, the crippled, the infirm, the old, the wounded, and any who suffer ailments, impairments, or behavior considered improper by yourself. That you admit you would make sport of such limitations of those that would suffer them, illustrates what a lowlife trash receptacle you really are. In this case, the "messenger" suffers from anti-social personality disorder, with traces of narcissistic personality disorder and a bit of obsessive compulsive disorder thrown in to paint a complete picture. When taken in the context of these issues, the validity and judgement of the "messenger" is automatically suspect, and any conclusions that arise from said individual should be considered as nothing more than hearsay. Only your claims atren't hearsay and since you have no status, no accreditation, no nothing, what you say is merely a lost individual that fancies himself some type status and importance,,pobably because you;ve been starved of such all your life. S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs. I gain much more satisfaction from having you share your beliefs with the world. Mr. Pot, meet Mr Kettle. Dave "Sandbagger" LOL....your diagnosis' (hehe,,how cute) only came to light with your inability to support your own lies concerning a busted cber in Philly. Can't touch this! The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| X-terminator antenna | CB | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Dual Base Stations and One Antenna | CB | |||
Linear Mode
