From: (Lancer)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:43:09 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
Frank Gillinad wrote:
(And for the record, all high-tech gizmos
designed to compensate for the inductive
reactance of power and transmission lines
during a lightning strike have failed miserably
because lightning has no fixed frequency.)

Frequency has no relation to the success or failure of lightning
protection devices in the manner you implied.
_
Thats true, did he say otherwise?


He did. He said..."


...because lightning has no fixed frequency."


Again, frequency has no relation to the manner in whcih he inferred.



Sorry I missed that




Forget about it and move on. Must be a temporary Texas thing.


The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Hey mudchicken,,spit out those tailfeathers when you're' done choking.

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (I*Am*Not*George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days



In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post the
other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.

I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know what you're talking
about. You really need to keep better track of the objects of your
obsession .

When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that I have little to
contribute to the group as it now stands. I do read posts on occasion
just to see if there might be something that may be of interest. The
point is that I do not post with the same frequency that I did in
years past.

What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!

That's the way you took it. They way I meant it should be fairly
obvious to anyone else who doesn't have a comprehensive disorder.


and you're STILL obsessing with me.



That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.


What in any of those quotes do you find hypocritical? I have always
maintained that certain activities are illegal. But if you are of the
mindset that you do not wish to abide by those rules, at least go
about it with a little common sense and keep a low profile. There's no
sense calling attention to yourself by interfering with your neighbors
or acting in a disrespectful manner, which would have the overall
effect of painting a big red bullseye on your forehead. So unless you
work for Target, that's not a good thing.




You have even taken to quoting me.

I suppose that I could look at it as a silent

confirmation of the validity of my points.



What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.

If that's true, then why do you keep bringing me up in past quotes? I
suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom of letting a sleeping dog
alone.


Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?


I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.


Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of your own? Do you always
base your principles on the quotes of others?


What's that they say about imitation being the

highest form of flattery?




Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!

If the shoe fits, Cinderella......





I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't

want to wake up one morning and see you

camped out on my doorstep......

Dave

"Sandbagger"




You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.

I don't expect you to understand, but trust me, I am not the one who
is messed up.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Lancer)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:43:09 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
Frank Gillinad wrote:
(And for the record, all high-tech gizmos
designed to compensate for the inductive
reactance of power and transmission lines
during a lightning strike have failed miserably
because lightning has no fixed frequency.)

Frequency has no relation to the success or failure of lightning
protection devices in the manner you implied.
_
Thats true, did he say otherwise?


He did. He said..."


...because lightning has no fixed frequency."


Again, frequency has no relation to the manner in whcih he inferred.


Your communication deficit is acting up again, Dave -- I didn't infer anything.
In fact, I was -too- specific in that I used the word "gizmos", which limited
the aforementioned objective to the use of physical objects. I should have said
"devices".







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

(Twistedhed) wrote in message ...
From: (I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days
=A0=A0In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post
the other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.

I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know

what you're talking about.



Tut-tut,,you most certainly have a "pal" in Michigan.....you even
claimed you were "intimately" familiar with N8WWM's behavior and
repeater jamming activity so if it wasn't your Michigan bud who made you
"intimately" aware of the happenings that YOU felt important ebough to
bring to this forum for discussion,,,,,then who?


You really need to keep better track of the

objects of your obsession .



One can understand how illustrating your hypocrisy would be misconstrued
by yourself as an "obsession" by another. It's a natural reaction from a
non-proactive individual.




When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that
I have little to contribute to the group as it now
stands.




You always have had the need to reclarify your positions, Dave,,,you're
not very clear in your communication skills..see, saying you are "not
hardly around' is nowhere near the same meaning as saying you have
little to contribute.",,but you of course, already know that...otherwise
the need wouldn't have existed for you to completely change what you
said.




I do read posts on occasion just to see if

there might be something that may be of

interest. The point is that I do not post with

the same frequency that I did in years past.



What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!


That's the way you took it.


Yes,,as that is exactly what you said.let's see it again, as it is
apparently paining you....

I'm hardly around much these days
_
They way I meant it should be fairly obvious to
anyone else who doesn't have a

comprehensive disorder.



Yea? Only "anyone" else isn;t looking to you for validation like you are
seeking..and I don't see "anyone else" coming to your defense who
misinterprets "I'm not hardly around these days" to be a synonym for "I
have little to contribute",,,LOL,,,,,,only those who live in their own
world and see things in their own manner and are unable to see things as
the majority can agree with that, Dave. The claims are so distant there
is no relation at all,,,,except in your mind.


and you're STILL obsessing with me.


That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.


What in any of those quotes do you find

hypocritical?



Your encouragement of others to break the law when you have cried like a
menstruating teen and callously attacked others for the exact same
behavior,,,merely giving information.


I have always maintained that

certain activities are illegal. But if you are of

the mindset that you do not wish to abide by

those rules, at least go about it with a little

common sense and keep a low profile.



This smacks in the face of what you have claimed in the past,
Dave,,you're two faced.

There's no sense calling attention to yourself

by interfering with your neighbors or acting in

a disrespectful manner,



Agreed, too bad you don't practice what you preach..as that hasn't
stopped you from acting in the most blatant disrespectful manner toward
others for beahvior you took part in.


which would have the overall effect of painting
a big red bullseye on your forehead.

So unless you work for Target, that's not a

good thing.




You've always cringed when your behavior was illustrated, Dave.

You have even taken to quoting me.

I suppose that I could look at it as a silent

confirmation of the validity of my points.


What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.


If that's true, then why do you keep bringing

me up in past quotes?



Because your PAST is very relevant, as you can not run from it, no
matter what you do or say. Again, what you do or don't do, is no
*longer' any consequence, in other words,,,your words and actions now
are all for naught,,your past behavior tells the entire story,
especially when you break your neck trying to change what you plainly
said to mean something entirely diffferent,,(snicker).



I suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom

of letting a sleeping dog alone.



But you;re not sleeping, Dave,,,you are up to your usual games and no
good,,it's why you lost YET ANOTHER ISP. I never wasnted any problems
with you Dave, adn told you so way back when...you should have heeded
the advice you now ask of another when the table has turned, but
sure,,,,I can leave it alone, Dave,,,let's see if you can.,,that
includes your sock puppets.



Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?


I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.


Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of

your own?



Sure,,,they were so profound they were responsible for you and the rest
of tream voobs downfall (read: snatched ISP's)..


Do you always base your principles on the

quotes of others?


No,,they arent my principles,,they are yours,,and eveyone knows I am
world champion of returning things to whence they came.


What's that they say about imitation being the

highest form of flattery?


Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!


If the shoe fits, Cinderella......


You can refer to a man as a woman all you wish,,it won;t help what ails
you.


I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't

want to wake up one morning and see you

camped out on my doorstep......

Dave

"Sandbagger"


You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.


I don't expect you to understand, but trust me,



You're a proven liar, Dave, and liars can not be trusted, so no, you
will not be trusted......now, you can continue to choose to attack the
messenger as has been your specialty,
and continue to play the victim after initiating rabid attacks, but you
will never get away with it again.


I am not the one who is messed up.

Dave

"Sandbagger"



S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs. I
gain much more satisfaction from having you share your beliefs with the
world.




The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Lancer)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:43:09 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
Frank Gillinad wrote:
(And for the record, all high-tech gizmos designed to compensate for the
inductive reactance of power and transmission lines during a lightning
strike have failed miserably because lightning has no fixed frequency.)


Frequency has no relation to the success or failure of lightning
protection devices in the manner you implied.
_
Thats true, did he say otherwise?


He did. He said..."


...because lightning has no fixed frequency."


Again, frequency has no relation to the manner in whcih he inferred.


Your communication deficit is acting up again,

Dave -- I didn't infer anything.

LOL,,thou shall not project thou deficits unto others.
You did indeed infer such. I will remind you for the third time just
what it was you said....you said......

Lightning has no fixed frequency.


Again,,,lightning, in realtion to frequency in the manner you claimed,
is fluff talk..it has no merit,,it means nothing.

In fact, I was -too- specific in that I used the

word "gizmos", which limited the

aforementioned objective to the use of

physical objects.



You brought up lightning not being frequency specific,,it means nothing,
has no relation.



I should have said "devices".



But you didn't. Apology accepted.



-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----=3D=3D Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =3D-----

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
From: (I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog poop?
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:

(snip)

No snip, junior T-man..ask and you shall receive:


it is much safer for a CBer to run power from

the mobile. That way you never interfere with

the same people for very long.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd



LOL....riiiiiiight! You ask for the quote,,I provide it,,,and it's my
fault that Dave Hall N3CVJ breaks the law, claims he doesn't and
encourages others to break FCC law. You poor, poor, self-defeated, soul.



causing trouble for Dave Hall again. Is it

because you two share the same first name.
_

LOL...do you practice at being so ignorant, impotent, and wrong, or does
it come naturally? Tailfeathers digested, yet? Hyuk!



Freedom is participation in power - Cicero

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

In , while under the compulsion
to defend against every little nuance written about him that inflicts damage to
his delicate constitution, (Twistedhed) wrote:


S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs.


Then shut up already.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Lancer)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:43:09 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
Frank Gillinad wrote:
(And for the record, all high-tech gizmos designed to compensate for the
inductive reactance of power and transmission lines during a lightning
strike have failed miserably because lightning has no fixed frequency.)


Frequency has no relation to the success or failure of lightning
protection devices in the manner you implied.
_
Thats true, did he say otherwise?


He did. He said..."


...because lightning has no fixed frequency."


Again, frequency has no relation to the manner in whcih he inferred.


Your communication deficit is acting up again,

Dave -- I didn't infer anything.

LOL,,thou shall not project thou deficits unto others.
You did indeed infer such. I will remind you for the third time just
what it was you said....you said......

Lightning has no fixed frequency.


I said, in context, "...all high-tech gizmos designed to compensate for the
inductive reactance of power and transmission lines during a lightning strike
have failed miserably because lightning has no fixed frequency."


Again,,,lightning, in realtion to frequency in the manner you claimed,
is fluff talk..it has no merit,,it means nothing.

In fact, I was -too- specific in that I used the

word "gizmos", which limited the

aforementioned objective to the use of

physical objects.



You brought up lightning not being frequency specific,,it means nothing,
has no relation.


The fact that lightning has no fixed frequency is very relevant when the topic
is about lighting protection 'devices' that are based, in part or in whole, on
reactance compensation. The only person who wouldn't understand the relationship
is someone, such as yourself, who is ignorant of the fact that reactance is
frequency-dependent.


I should have said "devices".



But you didn't. Apology accepted.


It wasn't an apology. It was a reference to a previous display of your
communication deficit; i.e, your ignorance of the meaning of the word 'device'.
You are just too dumb to know when you are being mocked, which is yet another
example of your communication deficit.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----