| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
March 31st 04, 03:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Attention, Jerry Oxendine (on topic)
Steveo wrote:
Steveo wrote: Another ham radio operator busted: March 3, 2004 Mr. Mark A. Glover 10632 Artcraft Avenue Garden Grove, CA 92640 Amateur Radio License KE6TTL: Warning Notice Dear Mr. Glover: In reference to your letter dated February 26, 2004, concerning the Catalina Amateur Repeater Association, enclosed is the letter sent to you requesting that you not use the repeater. Our letter of February 2, 2004, explained the right of the repeater association to make such a request. If there are any further questions, please feel free to contact us. If you have an objection to the decision of the repeater owner, you are free to pursue legal action locally. No Commission hearing procedures are provided in such matters. Enclosu 1 CC: FCC Western Regional Director Catalina Island Repeater Association Here's a few more Jerry..it's a friggin' scroll of abuse reports. ALBUQUERQUE, NM: The FCC sent a Warning Notice March 14, 2000, to Amateur Extra licensee Dean M. Brown, AC5IU, advising him that information from the FCC's High Frequency Direction Finding Center in Columbia, Maryland, indicates that the licensee "deliberately interfered with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs on the 20-meter amateur band on March, 2, 2000." The FCC also cited information that the licensee "failed to identify and used a disguised voice." FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth warned Brown that operation of the type described "will not be tolerated," and he requested the licensee contact him to discuss the matter. BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ: The FCC sent a Warning Notice March 14, 2000, to Advanced licensee Ronald Marshott, N2NGY, to advise him that information before the Commission indicates the licensee has been "deliberately interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs on the 75-meter band." The FCC also said it has information that the licensee "failed to identify, identified by call signs not your own, and have made threats to other licensees." FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth warned Marshott that operation of the type described "will not be tolerated" and could result in a fine and revocation proceedings. Hollingsworth requested the licensee contact him to discuss the matter. CRANE, MO [UPDATE]: The FCC wrote former Amateur Radio licensee Lonnie H. Allen on March 15, 2000, setting aside the March 8 grant of a Technician license, KC0HJP. On February 23, the FCC canceled Allen's General license, N0TBO, after he failed to appear for retesting by January 31, as requested December 6, 1999. FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth said it was setting aside Allen's most recent Amateur Radio grant "due to allegations that raise questions about your qualifications to hold an Amateur Radio license." The FCC said that Allen took a Technician examination March 4 under the supervision of a W5YI-VEC volunteer examiner team. For now, that application will revert to pending status. Hollingsworth said the FCC would write Allen within two weeks "requesting a response to complaints about the operation of N0TBO." Hollingsworth warned Allen that, in the meantime, he has no authority to operate radio transmitting equipment. SALISBURY, NC: The FCC wrote Technician licensee Thomas F. Reynolds Sr, N4TFR, on March 14, citing information before the Commission that the licensee has been using ham gear on the Citizens Band and other frequencies and has been selling "transmitting equipment not meeting the Commission's certification standards" over the air on those frequencies. The FCC said its information indicates the licensee has been using FM and LSB on 27.320 and 27.375 MHz and transmitting at power limits above those authorized for the Citizens Band. The FCC said operating uncertificated equipment at excessive power levels constitutes unlicensed radio operation and jeopardizes Reynolds' ham ticket. "Such operation will subject you to criminal prosecution and in rem seizure of transmitting equipment," the FCC warned. The FCC gave Reynolds 20 days to respond to the allegations and said the information he submits will be used to determine what action, if any, to take in the matter. In late February, the FCC wrote nearly identical letters to three other amateur licensees in Salisbury. Hey Jerry, have you seen this too? http://exax.net/fcc.htm |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Attention, Jerry Oxendine (on topic) | Policy | |||
| Dealing with off topic | Antenna | |||
| oxendine trouble with a capitol t | CB | |||
| oxendine trouble with a capitol t | Policy | |||
| Address the issues, Skippy! Repost #3 | CB | |||
Threaded Mode
