On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:10:51 -0500, FlavaFlav wrote:
I dont drink assflap.

maybe you don't drink assflap, but i bet you drink your fair share of whiskey

(Snotgeorge) wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2004 14:10:51 -0500, FlavaFlav wrote:
I dont drink assflap.

maybe you don't drink assflap, but i bet you drink your fair share of
whiskey

He's a drunken fool.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures, rotflmao.

Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

I never understand why people need to drive their amps with so much
power. With my amp in an out of box condition, 4 watts will push it to
500 watts carrier (In the high position), with little headroom left for
peak modulation (And it sounds fuzzy). Why would anyone need to drive it
with another amp?

Dave
"Sandbagger"


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures, rotflmao.

Or send mail to your house........

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to
ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp
(Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works
the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a
tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures,
rotflmao.

Or send mail to your house........

Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing and
threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he doesnt
get his way he will have a tantrum. He has no regard for laws,
restraining orders, using the us mail for threats, etc. so be advised.

Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to
ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp
(Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works
the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a
tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures,
rotflmao.

Or send mail to your house........

Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing and
threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he doesnt
get his way he will have a tantrum.

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to
ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp
(Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works
the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a
tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures,
rotflmao.

Or send mail to your house........

Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing and
threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he doesnt
get his way he will have a tantrum.

What are you babbling about now, you drunken fool? I want to
send -YOU- some mail. That's not harassment, dumbass.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing and
threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he doesnt
get his way he will have a tantrum. He has no regard for laws,
restraining orders, using the us mail for threats, etc. so be advised.

What retraining order, punk?

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

On 12 May 2004 20:06:21 GMT, Steveo wrote:
What retraining order, punk?

didn't he order you to "restrain" from teasing him and making fun of him?