RadioBanter - Peaked and Tuned

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)

- - Peaked and Tuned (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/31822-peaked-tuned.html)

Peaked and Tuned

Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

"Dan" wrote in message
om...
Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

http://www.wa3moj.com

"AKC Master Control" wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
om...
Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

http://www.wa3moj.com

'Made me look'. :)

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

On 6 May 2004 12:53:46 -0700, (Dan) wrote:

Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

http://www.bills2way.com

I've known Bill Nazdam for a while, good tech, nice guy too...

Ignore the trolls in here

On Thu, 06 May 2004 20:26:50 GMT, "AKC Master Control"
wrote:

"Dan" wrote in message
. com...
Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

http://www.wa3moj.com

hit the road, troll.

FlavaFlav wrote in news:Xns94E1AACAFA0D51234567890@
216.196.97.136:

"AKC Master Control" wrote in
ws.com:

http://www.wa3moj.com

Now that is the funniest thing I have seen yet.

just for rabid Voobner sycophants. =P

http:/www.concernedcitizensband.geo

http://www.1stopelectronics.com/

"Dan" wrote in message
om...
Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

"Dan" wrote in message
om...
Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

www.fcc.gov

Before the

Federal Communications
Commission

Washington, D.C.
20554

In the Matter of )

)

James R. Farlow )
EB-98-NF-438

103 Browning Drive )

Thomasville, NC 27360-3239 )
NAL/Acct. No. 915NF0001

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Adopted: March 2, 2000
Released: March 3, 2000

By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

1. In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, we grant reconsideration of the
Forfeiture Order[1] issued in this case for the limited purpose of
addressing one issue that Mr. James Farlow has raised in response to both
the underlying Notice of Apparent Liability ("NAL") and the Forfeiture
Order. The NAL proposed and the Forfeiture Order affirmed imposition of a
forfeiture against Mr. Farlow in the amount of $7,000, pursuant to Section
503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, ("the Act"), 47 U.S.C.
? 503(b), and Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, ("the Rules"), 47
C.F.R. ? 1.80, for willful violation of Section 303(n) of the Act, 47 U.S.C.
? 303(n), and Section 95.426 of the Rules (CB Rule 26), 47 C.F.R. ? 95.426.
For the reasons stated below, we affirm the $7,000 forfeiture amount.

2. The Bureau's Norfolk, Virginia, office received a complaint that Mr.
Farlow's citizen's band ("CB") radio was causing interference to home
electronic equipment. The complaint also contained allegations of use of a
linear amplifier by Mr. Farlow in violation of the rules governing the CB
radio service, 47 C.F.R. ?? 95.401 - 95.428. After receiving another
complaint concerning Mr. Farlow's CB radio operation, an agent from the
Norfolk Office went to Thomasville, North Carolina, to investigate the
complaint.

3. The agent confirmed that the interference was continuing and went to Mr.
Farlow's residence to inspect the CB installation. Once at the Farlow
residence, the agent noticed a truck in the driveway with a CB radio inside.
He then knocked on the door of the Farlow residence and was met by Mr.
Farlow. The agent requested permission to inspect the CB radio installation
inside the residence but Mr. Farlow refused to allow the inspection. This
fact is not in dispute. According to the agent, he then requested
permission to inspect the CB installation in the truck but was not allowed
to do so. As a consequence of the failed inspection attempts, the staff
issued an NAL for $7,000. Mr. Farlow has always maintained that he never
refused permission to inspect the truck and that the agent never requested
to inspect the CB radio inside the truck.

4. The Forfeiture Order states that Mr. Farlow "does not offer an
explanation as to why he denied the agent entry to inspect his truck." We
are granting reconsideration to acknowledge that Mr. Farlow did provide
such an explanation insofar as he contends that he did not refuse
inspection. However, although we are granting partial reconsideration to
correct the record, this action does not affect the amount of the
forfeiture. There is evidence in the record that there was a CB radio
installation in the Farlow residence. Mr. Farlow did not allow the
inspection of that installation, in itself a clear violation of Section
303(n) of the Act and Section 95.426 of the Rules. Because the NAL was
issued for $7,000, the base amount for one violation, the Forfeiture Order
affirming assessment of a forfeiture in that amount was not incorrect. The
staff addressed all the remaining issues and properly decided them in the
Forfeiture Order. We therefore affirm the staff's decision reached in the
Forfeiture Order.

5. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 405 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. ?
405, the petition for reconsideration of the Forfeiture Order in this
proceeding is hereby GRANTED to the extent indicated above and is otherwise
DENIED.

FEDERAL
COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

David H. Solomon

Chief, Enforcement Bureau

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

[1] 14 FCC Rcd 4092 (Compl. & Inf. Bur. 1999).

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of )
)
)
ROGER THOMAS SCAGGS ) EB Docket No. 03-241
) File No. EB-02-IH-0886
Advanced Class Amateur Radio )
Operator and Licensee of )
Amateur Radio Station W5EBC

ORDER OF REVOCATION

Adopted: April 22, 2004 Released: April 23, 2004

By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

I. INTRODUCTION

1. By this Order of Revocation, acting pursuant to
authority delegated to the Enforcement Bureau under section
0.111(a)(16) of the Commission's rules,1 we revoke the above-
captioned Amateur license held by Roger Thomas Scaggs. We
conclude, based on the evidence of his conviction for murder,
that Mr. Scaggs lacks the basic requisite character
qualifications to be and remain a Commission licensee.

II. BACKGROUND

2. On November 21, 2003, the Commission, by the Chief,
Enforcement Bureau, designated this case for hearing.2 The OSC
specified the following issues:

(a) to determine the effect of Roger Thomas Scaggs'
felony conviction on his qualifications to be and to
remain a Commission licensee; and

(b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced
pursuant to the foregoing issue, whether Roger
Thomas Scaggs is qualified to be and to remain a
Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio
Advanced Class License W5EBC be should revoked.

3. The OSC ordered Mr. Scaggs, pursuant to section 1.91(c)
of the Commission's rules,3 within thirty days of the date of
release of the OSC (i.e., by December 22, 2003), in person or by
his attorney, to file a written notice of appearance in order to
avail himself of the opportunity to be heard.4 The OSC provided
that the notice of appearance state that Mr. Scaggs would appear
on the date fixed for the hearing and present evidence on the
specified issues.5 The OSC informed Mr. Scaggs that, if he
failed to so file a written notice of appearance, his right to a
hearing on the matter of his amateur license would be deemed
waived, and the proceeding would be resolved thereafter in
accordance with section 1.92(c) of the Commission's rules.6

4. The Presiding Judge determined that Mr. Scaggs had
received a copy of the OSC but had failed to file a written
notice of appearance seeking to avail himself of the opportunity
to be heard.7 Accordingly, the Presiding Judge concluded that
Mr. Scaggs had waived his right to a hearing, and the Presiding
Judge terminated the proceeding and certified the case to the
Commission for disposition in accordance with section 1.92(c) of
the Commission's rules.8 The Commission has delegated authority
to the Enforcement Bureau for such revocation proceedings,
terminated on the basis of waiver, pursuant to section
0.111(a)(16) of the Commission's rules.9

III. DISCUSSION

A. Facts

5. Mr. Scaggs has held an amateur license since 1954. The
Commission's records do not reveal any violations by him of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ``Act''),10 or the
Commission's rules. However, on November 16, 1998, approximately
six months after the Commission's last renewal of his captioned
amateur radio license,11 Mr. Scaggs was convicted for the March
6, 1996, homicide of Penny Scaggs, his wife of thirty-five
years.12 The record in that case showed that Mr. Scaggs beat his
wife to death with a galvanized lead pipe and then stabbed her
several times in their home.13 Mr. Scaggs was convicted of
murder by a jury and sentenced by the same jury to a prison term
of thirty-two years and fined ten thousand dollars
($10,000.00).14 Mr. Scaggs' conviction was affirmed, and his
request for rehearing overruled on June 22, 2000.15 Mr. Scaggs
reports that he is pursuing post-conviction relief in the United
States District Court.16

B. Discussion

6. Section 312(a)(2) of the Act provides that the
Commission may revoke any license ``because of conditions coming
to the attention of the Commission which would warrant it in
refusing to grant a license or permit on an original
application.''17 Among the factors that the Commission considers
in determining whether the applicant has the requisite
qualifications to operate the station for which authority is
sought is the character of the licensee or applicant.18 In
making character assessments, the Commission focuses on
misconduct that demonstrates the licensee's or applicant's
proclivity to deal truthfully with the Commission and to comply
with its rules and policies.19 The Commission has consistently
applied character standards developed for broadcasters to
applicants and licensees in the amateur radio service.20

7. The Commission considers relevant ``evidence of any
conviction for misconduct constituting a felony.''21 The
Commission believes that ``[b]ecause all felonies are serious
crimes, any conviction provides an indication of an applicant's
or licensee's propensity to obey the law'' and to conform to
provisions of both the Act and the agency's rules and policies.22
In this case, Mr. Scaggs has been convicted of a most serious
felony - in this case the brutal murder of his wife of thirty-
five years.23 We find that such egregious criminal misconduct
justifies a finding that Mr. Scaggs will obey the law only when
it suits him.24 Mr. Scaggs' record as an amateur licensee and
the assertions of Mr. Shifrin, Mr. Scaggs' sole character
witness, who, notably, did not address Mr. Scaggs' criminal
conviction or any of the related circumstances, are not
sufficient to overcome the impact of Mr. Scaggs' crime.25 Thus,
we find that Mr. Scaggs does not possess the character
qualifications required by this Commission to be or remain a
licensee.

C. License Revocation

8. The Commission's character policies26 provide that any
felony conviction is a matter predictive of licensee behavior and
is directly relevant to the functioning of the Commission's
regulatory mission. The extremely serious conviction described
above mandates the conclusion that Mr. Scaggs does not possess
the requisite qualifications to be or remain a Commission
licensee. Based on the foregoing, we conclude, as a matter of
law, that Mr. Scaggs' above-captioned license should be revoked.

IV. ORDERING CLAUSES

9. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 312 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,27 and sections
1.92(d) and 0.111(a)(16) of the Commission's rules,28 that the
captioned amateur license held by Roger Thomas Scaggs IS REVOKED,
effective the fortieth (40th) day after release of this Order,
unless Mr. Scaggs files a petition for reconsideration or
application for review within thirty (30) days of the release of
this Order, in which case the effective date will be suspended,
pending further Order of the Commission.

10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this ORDER OF
REVOCATION shall be sent by Certified Mail Return Receipt
Requested to Roger Thomas Scaggs, RR 2 Box 4400, Gatesville,
Texas 76597, with a copy to Charles R. Burton, Esq., Minton,
Burton, Foster & Collins, 1100 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas
78701.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

David H. Solomon
Chief, Enforcement Bureau
_________________________

1 47 C.F.R. § 0.111(a)(16).
2 Order to Show Cause, 18 FCC Rcd 24367 (Enf. Bur. 2003)
(``OSC'').
3 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(c).
4 OSC, 18 FCC Rcd at 24369, ¶ 7.
5 Id.
6 Id., ¶ 8. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(c). Section 1.92(c)
provides that, whenever a hearing is waived, the presiding
administrative law judge shall, at the earliest practicable date,
issue an order reciting the events or circumstances constituting
a waiver of hearing, terminating the hearing proceeding, and
certifying the case to the Commission. See also 47 C.F.R. §
1.92(a).
7 Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 04M-03, released January 26,
2004. Therein, the Presiding Judge noted that Mr. Scaggs had
sent a letter to the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, in which he
argued that his record as a licensee did not warrant revocation
of his license in light of existing precedent. Letter from Roger
Thomas Scaggs to David H. Solomon, Chief, Enforcement Bureau, FCC
(Dec. 19, 2003) (``Scaggs Letter''). The Presiding Judge
determined that the Scaggs letter did not qualify as a notice of
appearance, as Mr. Scaggs stated therein that he could not appear
for the hearing because of his incarceration. The Presiding
Judge deemed Mr. Scaggs' incarceration as ``not of controlling
significance'' as to whether he or his attorney could have
appeared at the hearing. MO&O, at 1, n. 2.
8 Id., p. 2. See also 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(c).
9 47 C.F.R. § 0.111(a)(16).
10 47 U.S.C. § 151 et seq.
11 On May 28, 1998, the Commission granted Mr. Scaggs'
Application for Authorization in the Ship, Aircraft, Amateur,
Restricted and Commercial Operator, and the General Mobile Radio
Services (FCC Form 605), File No. 9504030452 (dated May 22, 1995)
and issued him the above-captioned amateur authorization.
12 See State of Texas v. Scaggs, No. 963026 (299th Judicial
District of Travis County, Texas, February 5, 1999)
(unpublished); see also Texas Penal Code § 19.02(b)(1). As
stated in the OSC, ``[t]he fact of Mr. Scaggs' felony conviction
is res judicata and will not be retried in this hearing.'' OSC,
18 FCC Rcd at 23468, n. 13.
13 See State of Texas v. Scaggs, 18 S.W. 3d 277 (Ct. App. Texas,
Austin 2000).
14 Id.
15 Id.
16 Scaggs Letter, supra note 7. Mr. Scaggs also submits a letter
from Mr. Ken Shifrin, who identifies himself as Chairman of the
Board of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. Letter from Ken
Shifrin to FCC (Dec. 10, 2003). Mr. Shifrin declares under
penalty of perjury that he has known Mr. Scaggs since 1985 and
that Mr. Scaggs ``has always demonstrated a great deal of honesty
and integrity.'' Id.
17 47 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2).
18 47 U.S.C. § 308(b).
19 Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast
Licensing, 102 FCC 2d 1179, 1190-91 (1986) (subsequent history
omitted) (``Character Policy Statement'').
20 See, e.g., Schoenbohm v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243, 246-49 (D.C. Cir.
2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 968 (2000) (affirming the
Commission's denial of an amateur radio operator's license
renewal application based on the licensee's felony conviction for
computer fraud, as well as his lack of candor regarding such
conviction); George E. Rodgers, Hearing Designation Order, 10 FCC
Rcd 3978 (WTB 1995) (finding that an amateur radio licensee's
felony conviction for indecent assault upon and corruption of
minors raised a material question of fact regarding his character
and qualifications to remain a Commission licensee); Thomas M.
Haynie, Order to Show Cause and Suspension Order, 7 FCC Rcd 4994
(FOB 1992), affirmed and licenses revoked, 7 FCC Rcd 7291 (PRB
1992) (revoking general radiotelephone operator, amateur advanced
class radio and amateur radio station licenses because of the
licensee's felony conviction for intentional interference with
satellite communications); Jerry E. Gastil, Order to Show Cause,
4 FCC Rcd 3977 (PRB, FOB 1989) (finding that a general radio
operator and amateur radio licensee's felony conviction for
interfering with governmental radio communications raised serious
questions regarding his character and qualifications to remain a
Commission licensee).
21 Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast
Licensing, Amendment of Part 1, the Rules of Practice and
Procedure, Relating to Written Responses to Commission Inquiries
and the Making of Misrepresentation to the Commission by
Applicants, Permittees, and Licensees, and the Reporting of
Information Regarding Character Qualifications, Policy Statement
and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3252 (1990) (``1990 Character Order'')
(subsequent history omitted).
22 Id.
23 State of Texas v. Scaggs, supra note 13, 18 S.W. 3d at 281.
24 See Contemporary Media, Inc., 13 FCC Rcd 14437, 14442, ¶ 11
(1998), recon. denied, 14 FCC Rcd 8790 (1999), aff'd Contemporary
Media, Inc., v. FCC, 214 F.3d 187 (D.C. Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
532 U.S. 920 (2001).
25 Id., 13 FCC Rcd at 14445, ¶ 15.
26 Character Policy Statement, supra note 19; 1990 Character
Order, supra note 21.
27 47 U.S.C. § 312.
28 47 C.F.R. §§ 1.92(d) and 0.111(a)(16).

Before the

Federal Communications Commission

Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of

ROGER THOMAS SCAGGS

Advanced Class Amateur Radio Operator and Licensee of Amateur Radio
Station W5EBC

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

EB Docket No. 03-241

File No. EB-02-IH-0886

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Adopted: November 20, 2003 Released: November
21, 2003

By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau:

I. introduction
1. By this Order to Show Cause, and pursuant to Sections
312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Act"),[1]
we commence a hearing proceeding before a Commission administrative law
judge to determine whether Roger Thomas Scaggs, the licensee of the
above-captioned Amateur Radio Station and Advanced Class Operator license,
is qualified to remain a Commission licensee in light of his 1998 felony
conviction for murder and whether his authorization should be revoked.

II. background
2. Approximately six months after the Commission granted Mr.
Scaggs' subject amateur radio license,[2] on November 16, 1998, he was
convicted for the March 6, 1996, murder of Penny Scaggs, his wife of
thirty-five years.[3] The record in that case showed that Mr. Scaggs beat
to death his wife with a galvanized lead pipe and then stabbed her several
times in their home.[4] Mr. Scaggs was convicted and sentenced by the jury
to a prison term of thirty-two (32) years, and he was fined Ten Thousand
Dollars ($10,000.00).[5] His conviction was affirmed and his request for
rehearing overruled on June 22, 2000.[6]

III. discussion
3. Section 312(a)(2) of the Act provides that the Commission
may revoke any license on the basis of "conditions coming to the attention
of the Commission which would warrant it in refusing to grant a license or
permit on the original application."[7] Among the factors that the
Commission considers in its review of applications to determine whether the
applicant has the requisite qualifications to operate the station for which
authority is sought is the character of the applicant.[8] Before revoking
a license, the Commission must serve the licensee with an order to show
cause why revocation should not issue and must provide the licensee with an
opportunity for hearing.[9]

4. In assessing character qualifications in broadcast
licensing matters, the Commission considers, as relevant, "evidence of any
conviction for misconduct constituting a felony."[10] The Commission
believes that "[b]ecause all felonies are serious crimes, any conviction
provides an indication of an applicant's or licensee's propensity to obey
the law" and to conform to provisions of both the Act and the agency's rules
and policies.[11] The Commission has consistently applied these broadcast
character standards to applicants and licensees in the Amateur Radio
Service.[12] Thus, very serious felonies raise potential questions
regarding an amateur licensee's qualifications.

5. Here, Mr. Scaggs' murder conviction[13] raises very serious
questions as to whether he possesses the requisite character qualifications
to be and to remain a Commission licensee and whether his captioned license
should be revoked. For this reason, we are designating the matter for
hearing before a Commission administrative law judge.

IV. ORDERING CLAUSES
6. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Sections
312(a) and (c) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,[14] and
authority delegated pursuant to Sections 0.111, 0.311, and 1.91(a), of the
Commission's rules,[15] Roger Thomas Scaggs is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE
why his authorization for Amateur Radio Advanced Class License W5EBC SHOULD
NOT BE REVOKED. Roger Thomas Scaggs shall appear before an administrative
law judge at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent order and
provide evidence upon the following issues:

(a) to determine the effect of Roger Thomas Scaggs' felony conviction on
his qualifications to be and to remain a Commission licensee; and
(b) to determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the foregoing
issue, whether Roger Thomas Scaggs is qualified to be and to remain a
Commission licensee and whether his Amateur Radio Advanced Class License
W5EBC be should revoked.

7. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 312(c) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1.91(c) of the
Commission's rules,[16] to avail himself of the opportunity to be heard and
the right to present evidence in the hearing in this proceeding, Roger
Thomas Scaggs, in person or by his attorney, SHALL FILE with the Commission,
within thirty (30) days of the release of this Order to Show Cause, a
written appearance stating that he will appear on the date fixed for hearing
and present evidence on the issues specified herein.

8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.92(c) of
the Commission's rules, if Roger Thomas Scaggs fails to timely file a
written appearance within the thirty (30)-day period, or has not filed a
petition to accept, for good cause shown, a written appearance beyond the
expiration of the thirty (30)-day period, the right to a hearing shall be
deemed to be waived.[17] Where a hearing is waived, the presiding
administrative law judge shall, at the earliest practicable date, issue an
order terminating the hearing proceeding and certifying the case to the
Commission.[18]

9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 312(d) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,[19] and Section 1.91(d) of the
Commission's rules,[20] the burden of proceeding with the introduction of
evidence and the burden of proof with respect to both of the issues
specified above SHALL BE on the Enforcement Bureau.

10. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the a copy of this ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE shall be sent, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Roger
Thomas Scaggs, RR 2 Box 4400, Gatesville, Texas 76597, and to his counsel,
Charles R. Burton, Esq., Minton, Burton, Foster & Collins, 1100 Guadalupe
Street, Austin, Texas 78701.

11. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, the Secretary of the Commission
SHALL CAUSE to have this Order to Show Cause or a summary thereof published
in the Federal Register.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

David H. Solomon
Chief, Enforcement Bureau

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

[1] See 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a) and (c).

[2] On May 28, 1998, the Commission granted Mr. Scaggs' "Application for
Authorization in the Ship, Aircraft, Amateur, Restricted and Commercial
Operator, and the General Mobile Radio Services" (FCC Form 605), File No.
9504030452 (dated May 22, 1995) and issued him the above-captioned amateur
authorization.

[3] See State of Texas v. Scaggs, No. 963026 (299th Judicial District of
Travis County, Texas, February 5, 1999 (unpublished); see also Texas Penal
Code § 19.02(b)(1).

[4] See State of Texas v. Scaggs, 18 S.W. 3d 277 (Ct. App. Texas, Austin
2000).

[5] Id.

[6] Id.

[7] 47 U.S.C. § 312(a)(2).

[8] 47 U.S.C. § 308(b).

[9] 47 U.S.C. § 312(c).

[10] Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in Broadcast Licensing,
Amendment of Part 1, the Rules of Practice and Procedure, Relating to
Written Responses to Commission Inquiries and the Making of
Misrepresentation to the Commission by Applicants, Permittees, and
Licensees, and the Reporting of Information Regarding Character
Qualifications, Policy Statement and Order, 5 FCC Rcd 3252, 3252 (1990)
("1990 Character Order").

[11] Id.

[12] See, e.g., Schoenbohm v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243, 246-49 (D.C. Cir. 2000),
cert. denied, 531 U.S. 968 (2000) (affirming the Commission's denial of an
amateur radio operator's license renewal application based on the licensee's
felony conviction for computer fraud, as well as its lack of candor
regarding such conviction); George E. Rodgers, Hearing Designation Order,
10 FCC Rcd 3978 (WTB 1995) (finding that an amateur radio operator licensee'
s felony conviction for indecent assault upon and corruption of minors
raised a material question of fact regarding his character and
qualifications to remain a Commission licensee); Thomas M. Haynie, Order to
Show Cause and Suspension Order, 7 FCC Rcd 4994 (FOB 1992), affirmed and
licenses revoked, 7 FCC Rcd 7291 (PRB 1992) (revoking general radiotelephone
operator, amateur advanced class radio and amateur radio station licenses on
the basis of licensee's felony conviction for intentional interference with
satellite communications); Jerry E. Gastil, Order to Show Cause, 4 FCC Rcd
3977 (PRB, FOB 1989) (finding that a general radio operator and amateur
radio station licensee's felony conviction for interfering with governmental
radio communications raised serious questions regarding his character and
qualifications to remain a Commission licensee).

[13] The fact of Mr. Scaggs' felony conviction is res judicata and will not
be retried in this hearing.

[14] 47 U.S.C. §§ 312(a) and (c).

[15] 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.111, 0.311 and 1.91(a).

[16] 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(c).

[17] 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(a).

[18] 47 C.F.R. § 1.92(c).

[19] 47 U.S.C. § 312(d).

[20] 47 C.F.R. § 1.91(d).

"Dan" wrote in message
om...
Anyone have some good websites for purchasing CB's that are peaked and
tuned by knowledgable techs?

You would be much better off investing money into a good antenna and
feedline. The peaking/tuning isn't going to give you noticable difference in
performance. Not only that but if not don properly, it can shorten the life
of the rig.

73 de Keith

On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

In the Matter of )
)
)
ROGER THOMAS SCAGGS ) EB Docket No. 03-241
) File No. EB-02-IH-0886
Advanced Class Amateur Radio )
Operator and Licensee of )
Amateur Radio Station W5EBC

Snip

Leland seems to forget that the amateur community, of which he is a
member, has its share of felons. In most cases he ignores pedophile
behavior of some amateurs. In this case he forgets to cite murder.

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster concerning
use of modified equipment on 11m.

Then on the other hand lets see if SteveoChicken has the nerve to show up at
the resident of the Ham you posted the info about and see if he wants to
start some crap with him. For all you know somebody did and the joke was on
the bozo who showed up there. 8-))

--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Wireless Network
Mobile computing
on the go brought
to you by Micro$oft

"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
Then on the other hand lets see if SteveoChicken has the nerve to show up
at the resident of the Ham

Been there, done that. Shut your pie hole.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster concerning
use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things. Shall I post the one
about a Ham broadcasting illegally on FM? How about the one
that was interfering with Police & Fire Emergency calls?
Hey, we can even give you the one about a Ham trying to be
an air traffic controller, how about that one?
If you just want to harrass Mopar, do it! But I still wouldn't
want to be in your shoes ( harassing a guy of his size, living in
an area where you have to answer the door with a gun, etc etc)

Landshark

--
Courage is what it takes to stand up
and speak; courage is also what it
takes to sit down and listen.

Steveo wrote:
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
Then on the other hand lets see if SteveoChicken has the nerve to
show up at the resident of the Ham

Been there, done that. Shut your pie hole.

Pie must be a new word for sperm.......

--
_____________________________________
Hotel sheets, rental cars, late flights, fast food.
What's not to love about consulting?!?!?

Landshark has a case of Aids wrote:
steve parks is as much of a pussy as you are, how is your case of aids
doing?

I have $1 says you would never say that to thier faces.

--
_____________________________________
Hotel sheets, rental cars, late flights, fast food.
What's not to love about consulting?!?!?

"Road Warrior" wrote in message
. ..
Landshark has a case of Aids wrote:
steve parks is as much of a pussy as you are, how is your case of aids
doing?

I have $1 says you would never say that to thier faces.

Dude, you could bet a thousand dollars he wouldn't
say that to Mopar's or mine. LMAO!!!

Landshark

--
Hard things are put in our way,
not to stop us, but to call out our
courage and strength.

Landshark wrote:
Dude, you could bet a thousand dollars he wouldn't
say that to Mopar's or mine. LMAO!!!

That is what I struggle most with on Usenet. It's so easy to be incredibly
rude here; but those same folks would never do anything like that in real
life. Is this place just a form of target practice to burn off the
frustration of a bad week at work? Well, for those of us that do work.
Frank need not answer that statement, as I did not mention out of work mop
jockeys.

--
_____________________________________
Hotel sheets, rental cars, late flights, fast food.
What's not to love about consulting?!?!?

"Landshark" wrote in message om...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster concerning
use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things. Shall I post the one
about a Ham broadcasting illegally on FM? How about the one
that was interfering with Police & Fire Emergency calls?
Hey, we can even give you the one about a Ham trying to be
an air traffic controller, how about that one?
If you just want to harrass Mopar, do it! But I still wouldn't
want to be in your shoes ( harassing a guy of his size, living in
an area where you have to answer the door with a gun, etc etc)

oh poor moped he is so harassed LOL yes it is a game to harass him on
this NG his size has nothing to do with it because he is a pussy all
he does it take pictures and leave notes ROTFLMAO hey steveo if you
come to my house at least do the lawn while your here

In article , Landshark has a case of
Aids says...

"Landshark" wrote in
om:

If you just want to harrass Mopar, do it! But I still wouldn't
want to be in your shoes ( harassing a guy of his size, living in
an area where you have to answer the door with a gun, etc etc)

Landshark

steve parks is as much of a pussy as you are, how is your case of aids
doing? better lay of the cock sandwiches. go back to posting from tera news

I love to suck cock and eat cum.

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
Then on the other hand lets see if SteveoChicken has the nerve to show
up
at the resident of the Ham

Been there, done that. Shut your pie hole.

Make me SteveoChicken. You ran you feather covered hide off when Doug
pointed a so-called "BB-Gun" in your face. So you're in the habit of running
away from toys. Yeah people should worry about you, NOT. You're a looser.
Drink a few more beers and go beat your wife some more. Sooner or later
she'll dump your pathetic carcass and end up with the house, the business,
and the race cars. How would she like seeing photos of your car, with
license plate clearly visible, parked at the local motel? Those trips you
make to pick up stuff where you're gone for several hours aren't all
business related. 8-))

--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Wireless Network
Mobile computing
on the go brought
to you by Micro$oft

"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
"Leland C. Scott" wrote:
Then on the other hand lets see if SteveoChicken has the nerve to
show
up
at the resident of the Ham

Been there, done that. Shut your pie hole.

Make me SteveoChicken. You ran you feather covered hide off when Doug
pointed a so-called "BB-Gun" in your face. So you're in the habit of
running away from toys. Yeah people should worry about you, NOT. You're a
looser. Drink a few more beers and go beat your wife some more. Sooner or
later she'll dump your pathetic carcass and end up with the house, the
business, and the race cars. How would she like seeing photos of your
car, with license plate clearly visible, parked at the local motel? Those
trips you make to pick up stuff where you're gone for several hours
aren't all business related. 8-))

When would you like to fight me, Leland? How about if we fight
in the parking of where you work, so your friends can watch
me pummel you...by your van, OK?

Inductoheat
32251 North Avis Drive
Madison Heights, MI 48071
Phone (248) 585-9393
Toll Free: (800) 624-6297

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

WA3MOJ wrote in :

In article , Landshark has
a case of Aids says...

"Landshark" wrote in
. com:

If you just want to harrass Mopar, do it! But I still
wouldn't
want to be in your shoes ( harassing a guy of his size, living in
an area where you have to answer the door with a gun, etc etc)

Landshark

steve parks is as much of a pussy as you are, how is your case of aids
doing? better lay of the cock sandwiches. go back to posting from tera
news

I love to suck cock and eat cum.

Forge

Suxs to be you Steve parks medina Ohio

FlavaFlav wrote:
WA3MOJ wrote in :

In article , Landshark has
a case of Aids says...

"Landshark" wrote in
. com:

If you just want to harrass Mopar, do it! But I still
wouldn't
want to be in your shoes ( harassing a guy of his size, living in
an area where you have to answer the door with a gun, etc etc)

Landshark

steve parks is as much of a pussy as you are, how is your case of aids
doing? better lay of the cock sandwiches. go back to posting from tera
news

I love to suck cock and eat cum.

Forge

Suxs to be you Steve parks medina Ohio

It's -GREAT- to be me, humpy.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

"Road Warrior" wrote:
Landshark has a case of Aids wrote:
steve parks is as much of a pussy as you are, how is your case of aids
doing?

I have $1 says you would never say that to thier faces.

He owes me $1000 after lelnad and I spar. Remember the bet?

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

WA3MOJ wrote:
I love to suck cock and eat cum.

Vanilla or Chocolate, George?

--
_____________________________________
Hotel sheets, rental cars, late flights, fast food.
What's not to love about consulting?!?!?

On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad apples" of the ham radio
fraternity have no bearing on what happens here.

Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The fact that there are a
fair percentage of bad hams, does not diminish the seriousness of
illegal CB operation.

The original poster was not asking for information about "peaked and
tuned" ham radios.......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster concerning
use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens on ham radio is irrelevant
to the cause of CB radio.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Dave Hall wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster
concerning use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens on ham radio is irrelevant
to the cause of CB radio.

Except for the fact that certain hams like to come here to ****
with us CBers, and Jerry likes to post the enforcement logs.

So yes it is relevant.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

Dave Hall wrote:
On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad apples" of the ham radio
fraternity have no bearing on what happens here.

Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The fact that there are a
fair percentage of bad hams, does not diminish the seriousness of
illegal CB operation.

The original poster was not asking for information about "peaked and
tuned" ham radios.......

Get over yourself, or buy a badge.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 May 2004 03:39:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:

Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

Irrelevant. This is a CB newsgroup. The "bad apples" of the ham radio
fraternity have no bearing on what happens here.

Sure it does, Lee posts stuff about cb'rs getting busted,
Jer does, N8 does, WA3MOJ does, so why can all these
people put up things about cb'rs, but I can't post this
about Hams? A little one-sided don't you think? Naw,
never mind.

Besides, two wrongs do not make a right. The fact that there are a
fair percentage of bad hams, does not diminish the seriousness of
illegal CB operation.

Agreed, but the fact that this is a CB newsgroup that a couple of
certain hams (N8WWM, WA3MOJ) are trolling this group and
posting that just to inflame is ok? I think not, anymore than if
someone went onto the Ham groups and posted about Hams being
busted and then making statements that most hams are illegal, I
would think that would make them upset too.

The original poster was not asking for information about "peaked and
tuned" ham radios.......

OK, so? This is a CB newsgroup. Not a Ham newsgroup.

Dave

Landshark

--
My bad..the camera is mightier than the blowhard(s)..in most respects.

FlavaFlav wrote in
:

(snip)

I am not wa3moj. Deal with it.

yawn..