On Wed, 26 May 2004 06:05:06 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

He's always ranting about how the only proof he needs is his 'word'
because, as he says, "truth is my friend". Now whenever someone asks
him for proof beyond his own warped opinions he will just quote your
line above instead of wiggling away.

If he attempts to rely on only his "word" as truth when justifying his
position, while demanding irrefutable proof from others for the same,
that is glaringly hypocritical.


Fret not, as he always has an excuse at the ready.


I'm actually enjoying his latest meltdown. He even changed NICs, and
he's spewing out even more frothy rhetoric and vitriol at an
increased pace.

Spin and obfuscation are Twisty's best friends, but will end up his
ultimate demise.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Wed, 26 May 2004 11:41:02 GMT, "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html


Um, nowhere on that "link" is it stated that the radio is type
accepted nor is there an FCC I.D. number listed. So I ask again, does
anyone have it?

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Wed, 26 May 2004 06:54:51 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html



There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio.
Search the database yourself if you want:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm


Well, by golly, I goofed again. The FCC ID number is C2R-DX-2547, it's
a Ranger, and it is legal for CB. But what I didn't see on the Galaxy
website was a built-in roger-beep -- instead the board is available as
an accessory.


Galaxy and Ranger are basically one in the same. They are notorious
for "pushing the limit" as far as legality is concerned. I've never
liked Galaxy radios. They're basically knock-offs of Uniden designs,
many of which were not the most reliable.

What I don't understand is your last statement. Which Galaxy website
did you see the roger beep listed as an add-on accessory? The link
provided above lists the roger beep as a standard feature.

I'm perfectly willing to admit when I'm wrong, but I'm curious when
the FCC changed its opinion on roger beeps from their earlier
proclamation that they were considered "amusement" devices and
therefore not legal. This happened about 20-some years ago when roger
beeps first started springing up.

I'm also curious why they now allow variable power. Not since the
60's, when some radios had 100 mW low power positions, have I seen a
radio with user adjustable power (Other than walkie-talkies).

Common sense would tell me that if these things were clearly legal,
that the manufacturers would rush to include them en-masse as
"features". These all enhance the perceived value of a radio, and
gives the manufacturers a reason to charge more for things that cost
little to add at the factory. Most CBers are mesmerized by bells and
whistles, so this would clearly be a marketing plus.


Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link:
http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html



There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio.
Search the database yourself if you want:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm

Hey, that's odd. My Uniden Grant XL didn't show up there either. ;-)

73 de Bert
WA2SI

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:03:50 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
This also contradicts N3CVJ's recent claim that the repeater in question
was shared and co-owned. In fact, this post, albeit a lie, confirms that
he was attempting to portray the repeater using the Phelps was HIS. Note
the words "MY repeater"..."MY Stationmaster". Total opposite of what he
recently claimed.

When you keep adding dirt to a glass of water,

You initiated such with your offtopic insults, Davie. You shouldn't be
surprised or act offended when such behaior is returned. In fact, I have
been quite polite by comparison.

why should it surprise you that you end up

with mud?




You need something to wach down all that crow.


You are going to base your position on the

semantics of my posts?



LOL..nope,,,merely on your words, which you maintain should be "proof."
Again, and as usual, when illustrated your words show what a hypocrite
you are, they become, according to you, a meaning other than what they
actually are, or "semantics".
No, Davie,,,you were quite clear with your words. "My" is not the same
as "we". No semantics involved, whatsoever, each word is a very
different meaning. Claiming to have meant "we" when you used the term
"I" , even if true (but it's not), would only further that massive
communication deficit from which you suffer, as
you are struggling to convey just what you mean, effectively. Blaiming
another because you can't properly express yourself is your problem.
Claiming other people have faults because they can't "understand" you
when you
chose to use two very different words with two very different meanings
and profess they mean the same thing when they do not,, illlustrates how
remote you are in your beliefs compared to the masses. It's why you see
maladies in others and balme them for your difficulties,,,classic
projection/character flaw.


Yes the repeater is co owned, but I am one of
the owners. Since I take care of all the

technical issues, I tend to think of it as "mine"

in the same vein that Scotty refers to the warp

engines of the Starship Enterprise as "his".


I didn't watch star trek, as I was never a televison fan. I watch a
couple shows on HBO and at times, certain public shows or news.
Despite your attempts at trying to merge fantasy (television) with your
reality and bur the lines of what separate the two in your world, the
manner in which you "tend to think" is not consistent with the majority,
nor does what you "think" have any
effect on the definition of the words you selected.


Dave

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj



I'm interested in hearing more about this program (I own a repeater,
and am involved with a few others). IS this available as a download, or
is it something that is a high dollar purchase?
Dave
"Sandbagger"

--

Still have the Phelps?


What Phelps? I wish I had a Station Master........
Dave
"Sandbagger"

Group: rec.radio.cb Date: Wed, May 26, 2004, 6:59am From:
(Dave=A0Hall
Yes the repeater is co owned, but I am one of

the owners.
_
From: (SANDBAGGER)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Subject: of Antennas and Urination
Date: 5 Jan 1995 20:31 EST
Organization: Villanova University
Lines: 129
Distribution: world
Message-ID:
References:


NNTP-Posting-Host: ucis.vill.edu
News-Softwa VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41 In article
, (Mark G.
Salyzyn) writes...
(Dave the SANDBAGGER) writes:

And they don't hold a candle to



my



phelps

Dodge Super Station Master, on




my





220 repeater........
_
__




Message-ID:
From: Dave Hall
Organization: Spew Radio Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Subject: Power drops - square of the distance - Is this true and
what do...
References:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit Lines: 17
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:16:12 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.103.222.111
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: newsfeed.slurp.net 1039710442 207.103.222.111 (Thu, 12 Dec 2002
10:27:22 CST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 10:27:22 CST
--

Still have the Phelps?


What Phelps? I wish I had a Station

Master........

Dave

"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:06:44 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
It has come to my attention that all the manias you toss about as insult
are the ones from which you more than likely suffer. You typify the
classic projectionist and search for more insults as you angrily post
along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into consideration all but
the most supervised of visits were taken from you involving your child.
You realy should try and drop other's personal lives from your posts and
try attacking the post's view instead of the poster, but then again,
such is the reason you suffer from such a communication deficit...you've
never learned how to do so properly, and the hammie license only added
to your low self-esteem as it brought you none of the respect you demand
by sheer virtue of it Respect is earned as a person and must be given in
order to be received,,another concept that is foreign to your lowl self
due your deficits and learning disabilities.. One need only reflect on
your views on roger beeps being illegal for an afternoon chuckle of
monstrous but non-gregarious proportion.


Wow! you are so beside yourself that you had

to change nics.

Umm,,,,no,,though you are graasping for words once again, the word you
seek is "ecstatic".


Enjoying your meltdown?

I know I am........



I always enjoy myself. I'm not the one with low self-esteem and issues
of low self-worth and esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection.

It's not too late to call a mental health

professional...........



If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.


Dave

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
There are no current equipment authorizations
for any Galaxy CB radio. Search the database
yourself if you want:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/report

s/GenericSearch.cfm



LOL,,,man, Frank, whatever I did to pizz you off really screwed you up
big time,,,,,what on earth did I write that affected tyou to the point
of coming into this thread about legalities and ranting about (chuckle)
memmemmemmee.I mean, dude,,you made a string of posts about your
inability to cope...hehehe...nevermind,,,let's get back to the issue at
hand so you can be fed that ornithological diet from which you were
given..

Your search automotically ASSumes the belief that if a radio has not yet
been entered into an FCC database, such is illegal.
Not true, as such also makes the non-lucid assumption that the FCC's
database must be up to date, and if it isn't, faith that the bureau
would do so in a timely fashion...another snaffu in your lurid attempted
defense of N3CVJ's profession of his ignorance concerning radio, rules,
regulations, and laws pertaining. But hey,,,,jump on in, you kinda
remind me of a bloated Glen Campbell from the late seventies, with the
temper to match.




=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
http://tinyurl.com/ytcah

http://tinyurl.com/2yor7
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a
problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both
__

Hehe,,,
It is the citizen's job to enforce the law - Frank Gilliland


I work for an organization that is legally authorized to use the
freeband" - Frank Gilliland


Frank Gilliland wrote: Somebody should inform
Landshark that there is more than one person in this world named Scott.
Scott A. Gilbert, aka Race Warrior, aka SAPguru, aka etc, etc, etc.


Frank Gilliland wrote: that's either Twisty
or Timmy. -----=3D



From: wrote in message:
Frank Gilliland
wrote:
Race Warrior aka twistedhed
-


From:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Frank Gilliland wrote: Twited is actually Mike
from south Florida.
_


From:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Subject:
Frank wrote: "twisty is Richard Cranium"
_


Frank Gilliland wrote: His name is definitely
Dave McCampbell and he is an Extra.
_


From: (Frank Gilliland)
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
Subject: Week old, Spark? (sigh) Ok..
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 05:33:18 GMT
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID:
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/16.235
X-Complaints-To:
Lines: 25
What's even funnier is that your headers show the same path as KC8JBO,
Mr. K, Foghorn, and twisties real ISP.
_


_
"I have admitted to lying in this newsgroup, and on several occasions" -
Frank Gilliland




LOL..what a sad obsessed sack,,..

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 06:54:51 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:
In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Well, by golly, I goofed again. The FCC ID

number is C2R-DX-2547, it's a Ranger, and it

is legal for CB. But what I didn't see on the

Galaxy website was a built-in roger-beep --

instead the board is available as an

accessory.

Galaxy and Ranger are basically one in the

same. They are notorious for "pushing the

limit" as far as legality is concerned. I've never
liked Galaxy radios. They're basically

knock-offs of Uniden designs, many of which

were not the most reliable.

What I don't understand is your last statement.
Which Galaxy website did you see the roger

beep listed as an add-on accessory? The link

provided above lists the roger beep as a

standard feature.

I'm perfectly willing to admit when I'm wrong,



Hehehe,,,a barrage of insults and offtopic rants is not an admition of
anything..LOL.



but I'm curious when the FCC changed its

opinion on roger beeps from their earlier

proclamation that they were considered

"amusement" devices and therefore not legal.


The FCC never held that rule,,,,you are the one "claiming" they did,
with no link to provide such. All you did is quote a rule, and
ignorantly take it to mean "amusement" encompasses roger beeps. The FCC
never said anything of the such,,you did and you're beginning to ramble
offtopic with your personal feelings regarding such.


This happened about 20-some years ago

when roger beeps first started springing up.



Quote it. Cite it. Show the rule. Of course, the only thing you can
provide is lipservice.

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

On Wed, 26 May 2004 06:54:51 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html



There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio.
Search the database yourself if you want:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm


Well, by golly, I goofed again. The FCC ID number is C2R-DX-2547, it's
a Ranger, and it is legal for CB. But what I didn't see on the Galaxy
website was a built-in roger-beep -- instead the board is available as
an accessory.


Galaxy and Ranger are basically one in the same. They are notorious
for "pushing the limit" as far as legality is concerned. I've never
liked Galaxy radios. They're basically knock-offs of Uniden designs,
many of which were not the most reliable.


"Fragile" is the word I have heard most often used to describe all
three makes.


What I don't understand is your last statement. Which Galaxy website
did you see the roger beep listed as an add-on accessory? The link
provided above lists the roger beep as a standard feature.


You are right, it's in the list. I just missed it the first time.


I'm perfectly willing to admit when I'm wrong, but I'm curious when
the FCC changed its opinion on roger beeps from their earlier
proclamation that they were considered "amusement" devices and
therefore not legal. This happened about 20-some years ago when roger
beeps first started springing up.


They might justify it's use under 95.412(b) "You may use your CB
station to transmit a tone signal only when the signal is used to make
contact or to continue communications." The reason might be that a
beep at the end of a transmission is useful to indicate when the
person is finished transmitting, and not to 'amuse or entertain'.


I'm also curious why they now allow variable power. Not since the
60's, when some radios had 100 mW low power positions, have I seen a
radio with user adjustable power (Other than walkie-talkies).


There have been CBs in the past that have had power switches. Some of
the handhelds have a low-power switch to save battery power. But the
variable-power feature on Galaxys/Rangers is obviously intended to
trim the power fed to an amplifier, and I'm sure that is one reason
why the FCC doesn't like them.


Common sense would tell me that if these things were clearly legal,
that the manufacturers would rush to include them en-masse as
"features". These all enhance the perceived value of a radio, and
gives the manufacturers a reason to charge more for things that cost
little to add at the factory. Most CBers are mesmerized by bells and
whistles, so this would clearly be a marketing plus.


Who makes CBs anymore besides Galaxy/Ranger and Uniden?






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----