|
On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:08:53 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: In , Dave Hall wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2004 05:50:31 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , Dave Hall wrote: snip .... The fact that you cannot provide anything other than your own words to validate the claim to others does not diminish its value as empirical data. Oh great. Now you've done it. You just gave Twisty enough fodder to last him another ten years of trolling. Imbicle. Excuse me? He's always ranting about how the only proof he needs is his 'word' because, as he says, "truth is my friend". Now whenever someone asks him for proof beyond his own warped opinions he will just quote your line above instead of wiggling away. If he attempts to rely on only his "word" as truth when justifying his position, while demanding irrefutable proof from others for the same, that is glaringly hypocritical. Dave "Sandbagger" -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" |
On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:06:44 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: It has come to my attention that all the manias you toss about as insult are the ones from which you more than likely suffer. You typify the classic projectionist and search for more insults as you angrily post along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into consideration all but the most supervised of visits were taken from you involving your child. You realy should try and drop other's personal lives from your posts and try attacking the post's view instead of the poster, but then again, such is the reason you suffer from such a communication deficit...you've never learned how to do so properly, and the hammie license only added to your low self-esteem as it brought you none of the respect you demand by sheer virtue of it Respect is earned as a person and must be given in order to be received,,another concept that is foreign to your lowl self due your deficits and learning disabilities.. One need only reflect on your views on roger beeps being illegal for an afternoon chuckle of monstrous but non-gregarious proportion. Wow! you are so beside yourself that you had to change nics. Enjoying your meltdown? I know I am........ It's not too late to call a mental health professional........... Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv |
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html |
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" Saved me a trip, here's another rig I also had the pleasure of owning. http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html http://cbworldinformer.com/200107/ga...2547_photo.htm More specifically: (The rear panel "money" shot.) http://cbworldinformer.com/200107/dx...anel_clsup.htm 73 de Bert WA2SI |
In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio. Search the database yourself if you want: https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
In , Dave Hall
wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:08:53 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , Dave Hall wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2004 05:50:31 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , Dave Hall wrote: snip .... The fact that you cannot provide anything other than your own words to validate the claim to others does not diminish its value as empirical data. Oh great. Now you've done it. You just gave Twisty enough fodder to last him another ten years of trolling. Imbicle. Excuse me? He's always ranting about how the only proof he needs is his 'word' because, as he says, "truth is my friend". Now whenever someone asks him for proof beyond his own warped opinions he will just quote your line above instead of wiggling away. If he attempts to rely on only his "word" as truth when justifying his position, while demanding irrefutable proof from others for the same, that is glaringly hypocritical. Fret not, as he always has an excuse at the ready. ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
In , Dave Hall
wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:03:50 -0400, (Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: This also contradicts N3CVJ's recent claim that the repeater in question was shared and co-owned. In fact, this post, albeit a lie, confirms that he was attempting to portray the repeater using the Phelps was HIS. Note the words "MY repeater"..."MY Stationmaster". Total opposite of what he recently claimed. When you keep adding dirt to a glass of water, why should it surprise you that you end up with mud? You are going to base your position on the semantics of my posts? Yes the repeater is co owned, but I am one of the owners. Since I take care of all the technical issues, I tend to think of it as "mine" in the same vein that Scotty refers to the warp engines of the Starship Enterprise as "his". Now THAT'S something Twisty should be able to understand -- if it's been on TV he's probably seen it! ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
In , Frank Gilliland
wrote: In , "AKC KennelMaster" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio. Search the database yourself if you want: https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm Well, by golly, I goofed again. The FCC ID number is C2R-DX-2547, it's a Ranger, and it is legal for CB. But what I didn't see on the Galaxy website was a built-in roger-beep -- instead the board is available as an accessory. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com