On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:08:53 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 2004 05:50:31 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

snip
.... The fact
that you cannot provide anything other than your own words to validate
the claim to others does not diminish its value as empirical data.


Oh great. Now you've done it. You just gave Twisty enough fodder to
last him another ten years of trolling. Imbicle.


Excuse me?


He's always ranting about how the only proof he needs is his 'word'
because, as he says, "truth is my friend". Now whenever someone asks
him for proof beyond his own warped opinions he will just quote your
line above instead of wiggling away.

If he attempts to rely on only his "word" as truth when justifying his
position, while demanding irrefutable proof from others for the same,
that is glaringly hypocritical.

Dave
"Sandbagger"







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:03:50 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:

This also contradicts N3CVJ's recent claim that the repeater in question
was shared and co-owned. In fact, this post, albeit a lie, confirms that
he was attempting to portray the repeater using the Phelps was HIS. Note
the words "MY repeater"..."MY Stationmaster". Total opposite of what he
recently claimed.


When you keep adding dirt to a glass of water, why should it surprise
you that you end up with mud?

You are going to base your position on the semantics of my posts? Yes
the repeater is co owned, but I am one of the owners. Since I take
care of all the technical issues, I tend to think of it as "mine" in
the same vein that Scotty refers to the warp engines of the Starship
Enterprise as "his".


Dave
"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:06:44 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:

It has come to my attention that all the manias you toss about as insult
are the ones from which you more than likely suffer. You typify the
classic projectionist and search for more insults as you angrily post
along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into consideration all but
the most supervised of visits were taken from you involving your child.
You realy should try and drop other's personal lives from your posts and
try attacking the post's view instead of the poster, but then again,
such is the reason you suffer from such a communication deficit...you've
never learned how to do so properly, and the hammie license only added
to your low self-esteem as it brought you none of the respect you demand
by sheer virtue of it Respect is earned as a person and must be given in
order to be received,,another concept that is foreign to your lowl self
due your deficits and learning disabilities.. One need only reflect on
your views on roger beeps being illegal for an afternoon chuckle of
monstrous but non-gregarious proportion.

Wow! you are so beside yourself that you had to change nics.

Enjoying your meltdown?

I know I am........

It's not too late to call a mental health professional...........


Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

Saved me a trip, here's another rig I also had the pleasure of owning.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html

http://cbworldinformer.com/200107/ga...2547_photo.htm

More specifically: (The rear panel "money" shot.)

http://cbworldinformer.com/200107/dx...anel_clsup.htm

73 de Bert
WA2SI

In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html



There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio.
Search the database yourself if you want:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm





=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:08:53 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

On Mon, 24 May 2004 05:50:31 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

snip
.... The fact
that you cannot provide anything other than your own words to validate
the claim to others does not diminish its value as empirical data.


Oh great. Now you've done it. You just gave Twisty enough fodder to
last him another ten years of trolling. Imbicle.


Excuse me?


He's always ranting about how the only proof he needs is his 'word'
because, as he says, "truth is my friend". Now whenever someone asks
him for proof beyond his own warped opinions he will just quote your
line above instead of wiggling away.

If he attempts to rely on only his "word" as truth when justifying his
position, while demanding irrefutable proof from others for the same,
that is glaringly hypocritical.


Fret not, as he always has an excuse at the ready.



=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In , Dave Hall
wrote:

On Tue, 25 May 2004 12:03:50 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:

This also contradicts N3CVJ's recent claim that the repeater in question
was shared and co-owned. In fact, this post, albeit a lie, confirms that
he was attempting to portray the repeater using the Phelps was HIS. Note
the words "MY repeater"..."MY Stationmaster". Total opposite of what he
recently claimed.


When you keep adding dirt to a glass of water, why should it surprise
you that you end up with mud?

You are going to base your position on the semantics of my posts? Yes
the repeater is co owned, but I am one of the owners. Since I take
care of all the technical issues, I tend to think of it as "mine" in
the same vein that Scotty refers to the warp engines of the Starship
Enterprise as "his".


Now THAT'S something Twisty should be able to understand -- if it's
been on TV he's probably seen it!



=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

In , Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote:


"Dave Hall" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB
radios produced with a roger beep or an echo?

Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and
was/is
FCC type accepted.

http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html

Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That
radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something
else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is
entirely legal.

Dave
"Sandbagger"



Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html



There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio.
Search the database yourself if you want:

https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm


Well, by golly, I goofed again. The FCC ID number is C2R-DX-2547, it's
a Ranger, and it is legal for CB. But what I didn't see on the Galaxy
website was a built-in roger-beep -- instead the board is available as
an accessory.






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----