From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 25 May 2004 11:06:44 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
It has come to my attention that all the manias you toss about as insult
are the ones from which you more than likely suffer. You typify the
classic projectionist and search for more insults as you angrily post
along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into consideration all but
the most supervised of visits were taken from you involving your child.
You realy should try and drop other's personal lives from your posts and
try attacking the post's view instead of the poster, but then again,
such is the reason you suffer from such a communication deficit...you've
never learned how to do so properly, and the hammie license only added
to your low self-esteem as it brought you none of the respect you demand
by sheer virtue of it Respect is earned as a person and must be given in
order to be received,,another concept that is foreign to your lowl self
due your deficits and learning disabilities.. One need only reflect on
your views on roger beeps being illegal for an afternoon chuckle of
monstrous but non-gregarious proportion.


Wow! you are so beside yourself that you had

to change nics.

Umm,,,,no,,though you are graasping for words once again, the word you
seek is "ecstatic".


Enjoying your meltdown?

I know I am........



I always enjoy myself. I'm not the one with low self-esteem and issues
of low self-worth and esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection.

It's not too late to call a mental health

professional...........



If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.


Dave

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:

You typify theclassic projectionist and search for more insults as you angrily post
along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into consideration all but
the most supervised of visits were taken from you involving your child.

Projecting?


I'm not the one with low self-esteem and issues
of low self-worth and esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection.

You seem to bring it up an awful lot. Along the lines of "thou doth
protest too much".



It's not too late to call a mental health
professional...........



If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.

So now who's the one projecting?


I always enjoy myself.

No need to get THAT personal....... Besides, that leads to blindness.

You should try it with other people.


Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
It has come to my attention that all the manias you toss about as insult
are the ones from which you more than likely suffer.
You typify theclassic projectionist and search for more insults as you
angrily post along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into
consideration all but the most supervised of
visits were taken from you involving your child.

Projecting?


Certainly.The angrier you get, the more insults you post as you go
along. YOU went off-topic and began ranting about mememememe as opposed
to the FCC rule you were unable to debate absent of insult and
off-topics,,,,lol,,you are the one with a deficit in communications,
unable to separate a post from a person. You never learned the basic
debate or communication skill of how to attack a post (subject) without
attacking the poster (pperson),,,if you do it intentionally, it is borne
of your character flaw.
YOU went off-topic and entered insults to this thread. I'm not the one
selectively editing the thread and posts to create an illusion of
righteousness for myself..*you*....I'm not the one with issues of low
self-worth and self-esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection of
personal issues.....*you* are.


You seem to bring it up an awful lot.


*You* "bring it up" in each and every instance..lol. I merely point out
your hypocrisy and return it.


Along the

lines of "thou doth protest too much".



Which is why you snip the posts....you always distort truth,,,coupled
with outright lying and attempting to project a post out of context as a
manner in which it was not originally presented....you're a malicious
lowlife, Davie.



It's not too late to call a mental health

professional...........


If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.


So now who's the one projecting?


You are. *You* brought up your off-topic, obsession fancying yourself
somehow qualified to judge another merely by what they permit you in a
post.
Number one, such illustrates your need for status to the point of
creating it for yourself..sign of a low self-esteem and one not
satsified with their personal life and accomplishments,,,this gives way
to your behavior that demands the need for insulting
others,,"projection".
Number two, it illlustrates your self-hatred and dis-satisfaction with
your personal self and a bruised ego, as the need for insulting another
merely for their opinions and views is highly indicative of a character
flaw AND low self-esteem. It is also a picture perfect example of one
not capable of adult conversation and debate,,IE: proper communication
skills.


Enjoying yourself?

I know I am.


I always enjoy myself.


No need to get THAT personal.......



You are having expressive problems again, Davie. If you were not
interested in my self-enjoyment, you should not have inquired of such
and entered it into the thread.
I must grin,,,,,, you attempted to give the impression you did not
inquire of such by selectively editing your inquiry in your orginal post
and leaving only my reply to your inquiry...LOL..that is the second time
you attempted to do such in as many days, yet have failed,,,,,Lol..you
certainly have a ways with reducing yourself, Davie,,it's what makes you
a lid and a detriment to hammie radio. You're part of what is strangling
the hobby. You are a problem operator mostly for certain, as it is a
great probability that most act on the air in the manner they conduct
themselves in this forum,,,as it is all communication with nothing but
the most basic communicative skills, something you have yet to graps and
employ, necessary. Only the medium is different.



Besides,

that leads to blindness.



You're out in left field again, Davie. Better unwrap that tinfoil hat
you need wear when posting and clear your failed attempts at making
yourself clear to the masses.



You should try it with other people.


Does Kim have a problem with your incredible wit and know you're out
here initiating posts concerned with other's personal lives? Ah, in
fact, never mind,,,forget I asked that question,,it's not really
relevant or all that important.



Dave

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:57:07 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
It has come to my attention that all the manias you toss about as insult
are the ones from which you more than likely suffer.
You typify theclassic projectionist and search for more insults as you
angrily post along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense when taken into
consideration all but the most supervised of
visits were taken from you involving your child.

Projecting?


Certainly.The angrier you get, the more insults you post as you go
along.

Who's angry? Other than you that is....... You project that anger on
me, and then accuse me of doing it.

YOU went off-topic and began ranting about mememememe as opposed
to the FCC rule you were unable to debate absent of insult and
off-topics

You certainly are self absorbed aren't you? You think this is all
about you? What's the matter, didn't mommy give you the attention you
craved as a child, which you now demand from this newsgroup instead?


,,,,lol,,you are the one with a deficit in communications,

The more you say it (And you're up to practically every post now) the
less it means to anyone other than yourself.

YOU went off-topic and entered insults to this thread. I'm not the one
selectively editing the thread and posts to create an illusion of
righteousness for myself..*you*....I'm not the one with issues of low
self-worth and self-esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection of
personal issues.....*you* are.

Who's the one obsessing now? Yep, I'm your worst nightmare.....



Which is why you snip the posts....you always distort truth,,,coupled
with outright lying and attempting to project a post out of context as a
manner in which it was not originally presented....you're a malicious
lowlife, Davie.

Funny, I was just following your example of posting style. Don't like
it when your own rules and tactics are employed against you eh? As
they say in my parts, "What's good for the goose......"


If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.


So now who's the one projecting?


You are. *You* brought up your off-topic, obsession fancying yourself
somehow qualified to judge another merely by what they permit you in a
post.

Ok then, which are you? a liar or a mental case? Either you are what
you project, in which case it makes you a sociopath, or you faked the
whole "cartoon character" persona, which makes you an accomplished
actor and a liar. So which is it?

Number one, such illustrates your need for status to the point of
creating it for yourself.

I've created nothing. You're trying to assign it to me.


sign of a low self-esteem and one not
satsified with their personal life and accomplishments,

You speak as if you've had extensive experience in those areas.

this gives way
to your behavior that demands the need for insulting
others,,"projection".

Funny, the same thing neatly applies to you. You are merely the flip
side of the same coin that you accuse others of being.


Number two, it illlustrates your self-hatred and dis-satisfaction with
your personal self and a bruised ego, as the need for insulting another
merely for their opinions and views is highly indicative of a character
flaw AND low self-esteem.

It would be if it were true. You should leave the diagnosis to me. You
fall far short of the mark in that area.


I must grin,,,,,, you attempted to give the impression you did not
inquire of such by selectively editing your inquiry in your orginal post
and leaving only my reply to your inquiry.

Unlike you, I am not self absorbed and interested in reading my own
words, high fiving myself, and adding to the length of posts. I
comment on the relevant (And I use the term loosely) points and
discard the rest. Perhaps that comes from the old days on dial-up
BBS'es when bandwidth cost money, and we all leaned more toward
brevity.

Davie,,it's what makes you
a lid and a detriment to hammie radio. You're part of what is strangling
the hobby.

Care to elaborate on just what is "strangling" the ham radio hobby? A
hobby you have thus far rejected and claimed to have little to no
interest in?

So now you want us to believe that you are some sort of subject matter
expert on the dynamics of the ham radio hobby?

You are a problem operator mostly for certain, as it is a
great probability that most act on the air in the manner they conduct
themselves in this forum

If that is true, then you must be a real wing-ding on the air.
Hopefully Frank is wrong and you're not really a closet ham.

Besides,
that leads to blindness.

You're out in left field again, Davie. Better unwrap that tinfoil hat
you need wear when posting and clear your failed attempts at making
yourself clear to the masses.

I think "the masses" caught the humor (at your expense, of course) in
that comment.

Tell Ray I said hi........


Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:57:07 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: It has come to my attention
that all the manias you toss about as insult are the ones from which you
more than likely suffer. You typify theclassic projectionist and search
for more insults as you angrily post along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense
when taken into consideration all but the most supervised of visits were
taken from you involving your child.

Projecting?

Certainly.The angrier you get, the more insults you post as you go
along.

Who's angry?


If you;re not angry, then you have even more character flaws than you
have projected,,,insult for no reason is something that should be looked
into by a professional,

Other than you that is....... You project that

anger on

me, and then accuse me of doing it.
=A0



LOL,,,,that's pretty good, but all the OT insults begin with yourself.
=A0YOU went off-topic and began ranting about mememememe as opposed to
the FCC rule you were unable to debate absent of insult and off-topics

You certainly are self absorbed aren't you?


Isn't about me, Davie, even though you stress at every failed attempt to
make all your posts about me.


You think this is all about you?


All your p[osts go off topic and become one of mememem.

What's the matter, didn't mommy give you the

attention you craved as a child, which you now
demand from this newsgroup instead?


Aww,Davie,,Kim hasn't been informed of your actions, yet?

,,,,lol,,you are the one with a deficit in communications,

The more you say it (And you're up to

practically every post now) the less it means

to anyone other than yourself.

YOU went off-topic and entered insults to this thread. I'm not the one
selectively editing the thread and posts to create an illusion of
righteousness for myself..*you are*....I'm not the one with issues of
low self-worth and self-esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection
of personal issues.....*you* are.

Who's the one obsessing now?


You are Davie,,,all your posts are off-topic and of a personal nature
because you laughingly failed to produce anything to back any of your
bul**** claims. The fact that you ASSumed the FCC holds a roger beep
illegal is more professed ignorance. You apparently were corrected by
one who took pity on your ignorant rants, so instead of admitting you
were wrong, you do what you always do,,,run offtopic and attack the
person that illustrtated you are wrong and unable to produce anything
that bakcs your bul****.
You have failed to become educated on how to debate a topic and attack
the topic as opposed to attacking the person,,a deficit in
communications, no matter how much it pains you to be forced to see
yourself as the masses do.

Yep, I'm your

worst nightmare.....


Coupled with your assumed status and hallucinatory position of power
over cbers and otehr hammies by virtue of your ignorance, such a
statement is worth permmitting you to believe.
_
Which is why you snip the posts....you always distort truth,,,coupled
with outright lying and attempting to project a post out of context as a
manner in which it was not originally presented....you're a malicious
lowlife, Davie.

Funny, I was just following your example of

posting style.



You;re lying, Davie, I don't selectively snip posts unless initiated.
Trying to convince anyone otherwise is only telegraphing the strings to
which you are attached. Once again, blaming another for your behavior is
a character flaw.


Don't like it when your own rules and tactics

are employed against you eh? As they say in

my parts, "What's good for the goose......"



Agreed,,,and doing such has you so far off-topic and beside yourself
that you are unable to foucs on anything but myself,
_
If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.

So now who's the one projecting?

You are. *You* brought up your off-topic, obsession fancying yourself
somehow qualified to judge another merely by what they permit you in a
post.


Ok then, which are you? a liar or a mental

case?


Merely one that illustrates your communication problems, Davie. Your
personal problems are illustrated quite effectively by yourself.


Either you are what you project, in which case

it makes you a sociopath, or you faked the

whole "cartoon character" persona, which

makes you an accomplished actor and a liar.

So which is it?
=A0

You stil are inable to grasp the larger picture here. What I am or do is
of no concern to you, but somehow, you made me your world.
=A0Number one, such illustrates your need for status to the point of
creating it for yourself.

I've created nothing. You're trying to assign it

to me.



LOL,,,I do nothing of the sort,,,you have positioned yourself on many
occasion as an authorative with grandiose delusions somehow qualified to
judge others based on what they allow you. Blaming me has always been
your worse nightmare.
_
sign of a low self-esteem and one not
satsified with their personal life and
accomplishments,

You speak as if you've had extensive

experience in those areas.



Five years of watching you come apart at the seams in usenet and blame
everything from society to cb to myslef for your personal woes.

_
this gives way
to your behavior that demands the need for insulting
others,,"projection".

Funny, the same thing neatly applies to you.


But davie,,you are the one continually going off topic and making each
and every post personl, not I, so no, it applies to you, not I.

You are merely the flip side of the same coin

that you accuse others of being.




Oh, I most certainly admitted that I give back what is received very
well. It most definitely is circular, but the fecal prouction always
originates with your posts.


_
=A0=A0Number two, it illlustrates your self-hatred and dis-satisfaction
with your personal self and a bruised ego, as the need for insulting
another merely for their opinions and views is highly indicative of a
character flaw AND low self-esteem.

It would be if it were true.


LOL...you are the only one in this group incapable of seeing yourself as
others do. Denial that you begin hurling insults and running off topic
is but a small portion of your woes.


You should leave the diagnosis to me.



(snicker),,,,Oh, but I do permit you to elevate yourself every now and
then to an imagined position of status you need so very badly...it is
what reminds the rest of the world of radio all that is broken among bad
hammies and their callous behavior and need for something more in their
long list of non-accomplisments.

You fall far short of the mark in that area.

=A0=A0I must grin,,,,,, you attempted to give the impression you did not
inquire of such by selectively editing your inquiry in your orginal post
and leaving only my reply to your inquiry.

Unlike you, I am not self absorbed and

interested in reading my own words, high

fiving myself, and adding to the length of

posts. I comment on the relevant (And I use

the term loosely) points and discard the rest.



Your off-topic rants are not relevant. That you asked if I enjoy myself,
then when replied to, snipped your inquiry to give the impression you
never inquired of such, is not "relevant" but a deliberate, malicious
action, based on your latter comment concerning the reply...LOL....you
reduce yourself at my merest whim.

Perhaps that comes from the old days on

dial-up BBS'es when bandwidth cost money,

and we all leaned more toward brevity.

Davie,,it's what makes you
a lid and a detriment to hammie radio. You're part of what is strangling
the hobby.

Care to elaborate on just what is "strangling"

the ham radio hobby? A hobby you have thus

far rejected and claimed to have little to no

interest in?

Sure,,I could elaborate, but you have proved you cant follow a topic.
You can always attempt to redeem yourself,,,begin with quoting where the
FCC holds a roger beep as illegal and the passage where you claim they
hold a roger beep as a device of "amusement".
Addressing your latter comment, I have never claimed I have no interest
in hammie radio, but all can understand by now your incredible failed
attempts at attributing such lies to another.Yes, Davie,,you have world
of problems.



So now you want us to believe that you are

some sort of subject matter expert on the

dynamics of the ham radio hobby?




LOL,,that's almost as entertaining as you redundantly self-professing
status as some sort of expert on sociology qualified to "diagnose" based
only what you are permitted...hehehe.
You are a problem operator mostly for certain, as it is a great
probability that most act on the air in the manner they conduct
themselves in this forum

If that is true, then you must be a real

wing-ding on the air.


I am. In fact, I have met many, many great friends through radio over
the years. I also have conducted myself as I do here, giving people
respect and the benefit of doubt until they prove themselves not worthy,
not unlike yourself and N8 and Lelnad and Frank.


Hopefully Frank is wrong and you're not really
a closet ham.
=A0


Frank is always wrong,,,its' why you and he are two peas in a 3 way
pod,,,as another op said,,,..such misery sticks together.

=A0Besides,

that leads to blindness.

You're out in left field again, Davie. Better unwrap that tinfoil hat
you need wear when posting and clear your failed attempts at making
yourself clear to the masses.

I think "the masses" caught the humor (at your
expense, of course) in that comment.


And therein lies the beauty of conversing with you, Davie...what you
"think" has never been in
line with the masses.


Tell Ray I said hi........


I most certainly will if you tell me who he is and I can reach him on my
radio.
Does Kim know that you are out here initiating off-topic personal posts
on usenet concerning internet strangers you blame for your personal
woes?


Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

In ,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy
Azz) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:57:07 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
From: (Dave*Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: It has come to my attention
that all the manias you toss about as insult are the ones from which you
more than likely suffer. You typify theclassic projectionist and search
for more insults as you angrily post along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense
when taken into consideration all but the most supervised of visits were
taken from you involving your child.

Projecting?

Certainly.The angrier you get, the more insults you post as you go
along.

Who's angry?


If you;re not angry, then you have even more character flaws than you
have projected,,,insult for no reason is something that should be looked
into by a professional,


A professional journalist?
_
Other than you that is....... You project that
anger on me, and then accuse me of doing it.
*



LOL,,,,that's pretty good, but all the OT insults begin with yourself.
*YOU went off-topic and began ranting about mememememe as opposed to
the FCC rule you were unable to debate absent of insult and off-topics

You certainly are self absorbed aren't you?


Isn't about me, Davie, even though you stress at every failed attempt to
make all your posts about me.


You think this is all about you?


All your p[osts go off topic and become one of mememem.

What's the matter, didn't mommy give you the
attention you craved as a child, which you now
demand from this newsgroup instead?
_

He still demands his mommy's attention but she is too busy working to
support his unemployed ass.


Aww,Davie,,Kim hasn't been informed of your actions, yet?

,,,,lol,,you are the one with a deficit in communications,

The more you say it (And you're up to
practically every post now) the less it means
to anyone other than yourself.


YOU went off-topic and entered insults to this thread. I'm not the one
selectively editing the thread and posts to create an illusion of
righteousness for myself..*you are*..

At least it is easy to recognize as an illusion.

..I'm not the one with issues of
low self-worth and self-esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection
of personal issues.....*you* are.

Who's the one obsessing now?


You are Davie,,,all your posts are off-topic and of a personal nature
because you laughingly failed to produce anything to back any of your
bul**** claims.


More projecting. Your defining characteristic is to pull a thread
off-topic in order to avoid proving your claims then blame someone
else for your inadequacies.


The fact that you ASSumed the FCC holds a roger beep
illegal is more professed ignorance. You apparently

Nothing is apparent in your world of obfuscations. Noises that are
intended to entertain and amuse are indeed illegal.

were corrected by
one who took pity on your ignorant rants, so instead of admitting you
were wrong, you do what you always do,,,run offtopic and attack the
person that illustrtated you are wrong and unable to produce anything
that bakcs your bul****.

More projection.


You have failed to become educated on how to debate a topic and attack
the topic as opposed to attacking the person,

A practice which you continue to prove yourself incompetent at, as
each time the attack on the topic is held firm you run for the hills.


,a deficit in
communications,

For you it's a deficit in attention. You can't stay focused on one
issue long enough to resolve it, especially when irrefutable proof is
provided by the other person.

no matter how much it pains you to be forced to see
yourself as the masses do.

Yep, I'm your
worst nightmare.....


Coupled with your assumed status and hallucinatory position of power
over cbers and otehr hammies by virtue of your ignorance, such a
statement is worth permmitting you to believe.
_
Which is why you snip the posts....you always distort truth,,,coupled
with outright lying and attempting to project a post out of context as a
manner in which it was not originally presented....you're a malicious
lowlife, Davie.

At least he doesn't misquote well-respected dead people.
_
Funny, I was just following your example of
posting style.



You;re lying, Davie, I don't selectively snip posts unless initiated.

True, and you initiated the practice yourself.


Trying to convince anyone otherwise is only telegraphing the strings to
which you are attached. Once again, blaming another for your behavior is
a character flaw.


Your character flaws are easily attributable to your parent's failure
to teach you basic standards of moral hygiene and civil behavior.
_
Don't like it when your own rules and tactics
are employed against you eh? As they say in
my parts, "What's good for the goose......"



Agreed,,,and doing such has you so far off-topic and beside yourself
that you are unable to foucs on anything but myself,
_
If such would aid in your supervised-only visits with your daughter and
assist in maintaining a civil relationship with her mother instead of
one of hostility with all you come in to contact, I say go for it.

So now who's the one projecting?
_
The answer is patently obvious even to the most casual observer. But
the participant is not a casual observer.


You are. *You* brought up your off-topic, obsession fancying yourself
somehow qualified to judge another merely by what they permit you in a
post.

Ok then, which are you? a liar or a mental
case?


Merely one that illustrates your communication problems, Davie. Your
personal problems are illustrated quite effectively by yourself.


Either you are what you project, in which case
it makes you a sociopath, or you faked the
whole "cartoon character" persona,
_
It's not a persona, it's his real personality. He's a real-life
cartoon character!

which
makes you an accomplished actor and a liar.
So which is it?
*

You stil are inable to grasp the larger picture here. What I am or do is
of no concern to you, but somehow, you made me your world.

Well, your ego is as big as a planet....

*Number one, such illustrates your need for status to the point of
creating it for yourself.

I've created nothing. You're trying to assign it
to me.



LOL,,,I do nothing of the sort,,,you have positioned yourself on many
occasion as an authorative with grandiose delusions somehow qualified to
judge others based on what they allow you. Blaming me has always been
your worse nightmare.
_
sign of a low self-esteem and one not
satsified with their personal life and
accomplishments,

Accomplishments such as being a professional journalist, beating your
dogs, stealing homes from little old ladies, espousing the virtues of
violating federal laws? Or being a burden on society by leeching off
the state welfare system and your poor old mother?
_
You speak as if you've had extensive
experience in those areas.

He has.

Five years of watching you come apart at the seams in usenet and blame
everything from society to cb to myslef for your personal woes.

_
this gives way
to your behavior that demands the need for insulting
others,,"projection".

Funny, the same thing neatly applies to you.


But davie,,you are the one continually going off topic and making each
and every post personl, not I, so no, it applies to you, not I.

You are merely the flip side of the same coin
that you accuse others of being.




Oh, I most certainly admitted that I give back what is received very
well. It most definitely is circular, but the fecal prouction always
originates with your posts.

Pluck the excrement from thine own eye.

_
**Number two, it illlustrates your self-hatred and dis-satisfaction
with your personal self and a bruised ego, as the need for insulting
another merely for their opinions and views is highly indicative of a
character flaw AND low self-esteem.

It would be if it were true.


LOL...you are the only one in this group incapable of seeing yourself as
others do. Denial that you begin hurling insults and running off topic
is but a small portion of your woes.

You should leave the diagnosis to me.
_
Or even better, leave it to the invisible shrink.


(snicker),,,,Oh, but I do permit you to elevate yourself every now and
then to an imagined position of status you need so very badly...it is
what reminds the rest of the world of radio all that is broken among bad
hammies and their callous behavior and need for something more in their
long list of non-accomplisments.

You fall far short of the mark in that area.


**I must grin,,,,,, you attempted to give the impression you did not
inquire of such by selectively editing your inquiry in your orginal post
and leaving only my reply to your inquiry.


Unlike you, I am not self absorbed and
interested in reading my own words, high
fiving myself, and adding to the length of
posts. I comment on the relevant (And I use
the term loosely) points and discard the rest.



Your off-topic rants are not relevant. That you asked if I enjoy myself,
then when replied to, snipped your inquiry to give the impression you
never inquired of such, is not "relevant" but a deliberate, malicious
action, based on your latter comment concerning the reply...LOL....you
reduce yourself at my merest whim.


Perhaps that comes from the old days on
dial-up BBS'es when bandwidth cost money,
and we all leaned more toward brevity.
_
At least we could all focus on the issues of a topic instead of
obfuscating them into rants about communication deficits.

Davie,,it's what makes you
a lid and a detriment to hammie radio. You're part of what is strangling
the hobby.

Care to elaborate on just what is "strangling"
the ham radio hobby? A hobby you have thus
far rejected and claimed to have little to no
interest in?

Sure,,I could elaborate, but you have proved you cant follow a topic.

Pre-emptive excuse.

You can always attempt to redeem yourself,,,begin with quoting where the
FCC holds a roger beep as illegal and the passage where you claim they
hold a roger beep as a device of "amusement".

Because that's what it is usually considered to be.


Addressing your latter comment, I have never claimed I have no interest
in hammie radio,

That's why you whine about no-codes and presume anyone that criticizes
your trolling must be a hammie. Ok, sure, whatever.

but all can understand by now your incredible failed
attempts at attributing such lies to another.Yes, Davie,,you have world
of problems.


So now you want us to believe that you are
some sort of subject matter expert on the
dynamics of the ham radio hobby?


LOL,,that's almost as entertaining as you redundantly self-professing
status as some sort of expert on sociology qualified to "diagnose" based
only what you are permitted...hehehe.

More projecting.


You are a problem operator mostly for certain,

Now there's a perfect example of a failed attempt by someone with a
communication deficit to sound intelligent..."mostly for certain".


as it is a great
probability that most act on the air in the manner they conduct
themselves in this forum

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7
_
If that is true, then you must be a real
wing-ding on the air.


I am. In fact, I have met many, many great friends through radio over
the years. I also have conducted myself as I do here, giving people
respect and the benefit of doubt until they prove themselves not worthy,
not unlike yourself and N8 and Lelnad and Frank.

So you claim, but every time we dive into that puddle you jump out
whining to your mommy about how the water is too cold and blaming me
for making you jump in.
_
Hopefully Frank is wrong and you're not really
a closet ham.
*
No, he's just a paranoid wannabe. He doesn't have the self-discipline
to study for a test or learn code.

Frank is always wrong,,,its' why you and he are two peas in a 3 way
pod,,,as another op said,,,..such misery sticks together.

Besides,
that leads to blindness.

You're out in left field again, Davie. Better unwrap that tinfoil hat
you need wear when posting and clear your failed attempts at making
yourself clear to the masses.

I think "the masses" caught the humor (at your
expense, of course) in that comment.


And therein lies the beauty of conversing with you, Davie...what you
"think" has never been in
line with the masses.


True, as the masses don't want to watch the electrolysis treatments on
the palms of your hands.
_
Tell Ray I said hi........


I most certainly will if you tell me who he is and I can reach him on my
radio.
Does Kim know that you are out here initiating off-topic personal posts
on usenet concerning internet strangers you blame for your personal
woes?


Dave
"Sandbagger"
N3CVJ
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv


=============

http://tinyurl.com/ytcah
http://tinyurl.com/2yor7

=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:57:07 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: It has come to my attention
that all the manias you toss about as insult are the ones from which you
more than likely suffer. You typify theclassic projectionist and search
for more insults as you angrily post along,,,,,,,. It all makes sense
when taken into consideration all but the most supervised of visits were
taken from you involving your child.

Projecting?

Certainly.The angrier you get, the more insults you post as you go
along.

Who's angry?



If your insult comes freely with no anger, the character flaw of which
you display is much worse than initial misonceptions of yourself.

Other than you that is....... You project that

anger on

me, and then accuse me of doing it.
=A0=A0YOU went off-topic and began ranting about mememememe as opposed
to the FCC rule you were unable to debate absent of insult and
off-topics

You certainly are self absorbed aren't you?


Actually,, it is you that is self-consumed,,with ME. You made the thread
from one of your many errors (claiming that roger beeps are illegal) to
one of myself being your subject matter. To blame myself for your acts
is a bonus.

You think this is all about you?


Not at all,,,,you do.I was speaking of your ignorcane holding a roger
beep as illegal on cb and you made your topic one of me,,,as usual.
You're obsessed.

What's the matter, didn't mommy give you the

attention you craved as a child, which you now
demand from this newsgroup instead?


,,,,lol,,you are the one with a deficit in communications, focusing your
attacks and insults on the person instead of a topic...you were never
taught any better so you darn sure never learned how to debate. That
goof about the roger beeps being illegal sure has you in a tizzy,,,,lol.

The more you say it (And you're up to

practically every post now) the less it means

to anyone other than yourself.

YOU went off-topic and entered insults to this thread. I'm not the one
selectively editing the thread and posts to create an illusion of
righteousness for myself..*you are*....I'm not the one with issues of
low self-worth and self-esteem, coupled with self-hatred and projection
of personal issues.....*you* are.

Who's the one obsessing now?


LOL...it has always been you. No matter how many times I redirect your
childlike mannerisms and attention deficit, you are unable to maintain
your original topic of erroneously claiming roger beeps are illegal on
cb. Such an obsession and disorder has you unable to focus on anything
but myself.

Yep, I'm your

worst nightmare.....

Which is why you snip the posts....you always distort truth,,,coupled
with outright lying and attempting to project a post out of context as a
manner in which it was not originally presented....you're a malicious
lowlife, Davie.

Funny, I was just following your example of

posting style. Don't like it when your own rules
and tactics are employed against you eh? As

they say in my parts, "What's good for the

goose......"




You initiated such snipping of posts. Your rules,Davie, but your need
for balming others for your actions has always been part of your
depression.


It's not too late to call a mentla health

professional


If such would aid in your supervised-only visits
with your daughter and assist in maintaining a civil relationship with
her mother instead of one of hostility with all you come in to contact,
I say go for it.

So now who's the one projecting?

You did by mentioning a mental health professional, but such would
probably aid you in your dilemma in seeing nothing but the moral fabric
of society crashing in on your depression-filled life and world.


*You* brought up your off-topic, obsession
fancying yourself somehow qualified to judge
another merely by what they permit you in a
post.

Ok then, which are you? a liar or a mental

case? Either you are what you project,



I project nothing. Your interpretive skills are mildly retarded and you
"see" things that no one else does, such as roger beeps being illegal on
cb,,and socialism as the asnwer to our government, and privacy being a
means for someone to get away with a criminal act....LOL...again,,the
problem, as always, is within yourself. Blaming me, and society, and the
FCC is not healthy or logical.


in which case it makes you a sociopath, or you
faked the whole "cartoon character" persona,



Well, gee, davie,,not only have you sealed your reputation as an Extra
who doesn't have a clues at all about rules and regulations pertaining
to cb radio (based on your hysterical claim that roger beeps are
illegal), but entertaining thoughts to yourself that my usenet name may
somehow be a legal name and "real" to yourself to the point of wondering
aloud if the persona was "faked" or not, illustrates just exactly how
far over the edge you were pushed,,,,,,LOL.

which makes you an accomplished actor and

a liar. So which is it?
=A0


The accomplished liar is yourself,,,your posts affirm such going all the
way back into the archives,,you have lied about the Phelps, a cber being
busted,,,you claimed the FCC maintains the roger beep is a sound effect
device for amusement, but can not cite anything to back up any of your
claims. Yet, somehow,,,,this is the fault of either myself or
"society",,hyuk.
The list goes on and on
=A0Such illustrates your need for status to the point of creating it for
yourself.

I've created nothing.


In proper context of contributions to the world and the betterment of
society, such a statement is true, as you have been taught your rants
about society and myself as one are reactive and no proactive.
But in the context of that of what you present, it isn't anyone else on
this group that recognizes your self-professed qualifications of judging
others,,only you feel and claim yourself qualified to judge others by
standards you set,,,such as the length of time one has spent in radio.
This is called elitism and would be frowned upon if it weren't for the
fact that watching you claim self-elevation is but one of the small gems
that makes many of us feel so good about our lives. Whenever one of us
that know how to treat people without insult need a pick-me-up, we
merely tune in to one of your posts or one of Franks. On one of those
rare occasions where we have a bad day at work or play, we have only to
read what you have posted to remind us how screwed up others like
yourself really are, and immediately feel good about our lives,as we
thank God for our blessings and realize our problems in life our quite
mundane when compared to those that you share on a daily basis with the
world: blaming society, hating yourself, subconsciously chossing to see
nothing but the bad in society and feeling comletely helpless and
hapless about the diagnose,,,er,,,subject, and blaming others for your
self-created hell.

You're trying to assign it to me.



You've assigned yourself these things. Again, no one else has ever made
the mistake that you have and attributed such qualifications to
yourself. You are now suffering from delusions of grandeur.

Your bahavior is sign of a low self-esteem and one not
satsified with their personal life and accomplishments,

You speak as if you've had extensive

experience in those areas.


All the regs, Davie, have been exposed to your many years of angry posts
crying about society, seeing society as direct reflection of CB radio.

_
Such gives way
to your behavior that demands the need for insulting
others,,"projection".

Funny, the same thing neatly applies to you.

You are merely the flip side of the same coin

that you accuse others of being.
=A0


Not one person can come forward and claim I have wrongfully affronted
them. I attack issues, not people, until initiated. If defending a
position I present must encompass the attack of another by illustrating
their initial attacks, so be it. I don't mind getting down in the mud
once in awhile with swine not unlike yourself to illustrate what
malicious liars and scumbag hypocrites those who defended N8's behavior
(read: yourself) while attacking others for the "crime" of speaking
about freebanding, actually are.


_
=A0Number two, it illlustrates your self-hatred and dis-satisfaction
with your personal self and a bruised ego, as the need for insulting
another merely for their opinions and views is highly indicative of a
character flaw AND low self-esteem.

It would be if it were true. You should leave

the diagnosis to me.



Might as well, as no one else holds you as qualified except yourself.


You fall far short of the mark in that area.

_
enjoying yourself? I know I am

I always enjoy myself

No need to get THAT personal
=A0
Besides,

that leads to blindness.

You're out in left field again, Davie. Better unwrap that tinfoil hat
you need wear when posting and clear your failed attempts at making
yourself clear to the masses.

=A0I must grin,,,,,, you attempted to give the impression you did not
inquire of such by selectively editing your inquiry in your orginal post
and leaving only my reply to your inquiry.


I comment on the relevant (And I use the term

loosely) points and discard the rest.



You were the one that deemed "enjoying myself" as relevant. You're
breaking down and self-contradcting yourself, Davie, as you're posts are
so far removed from your assinine claim that the FCC had roger beeps as
illegal and the more you snip them the further you remive
yourself..but,,,that is the point, isn't it,,to remove yourlsef from
such foolish claims, as it is quite embarrassing to see an Extra have
his collective azz kicked in rules and regulations knowledge by a low
life cber that freebands...lMAO!

_
Such what makes you
a lid and a detriment to hammie radio. You're part of what is strangling
the hobby.

Care to elaborate on just what is "strangling"

the ham radio hobby?



You are. You are part of the problem, Elaborating will just cornfuse you
further, I prefer to continue to use you as the example here on usenet.
That you require detailed and further explanation is just another to add
to your list of ever-growing personal problems.

A hobby you have thus far rejected and

claimed to have little to no interest in?



I rejected no such thing at any time, but your desperation is much
appreciated.


So now you want us to believe that you are

some sort of subject matter expert on the

dynamics of the ham radio hobby?



No more than you desperately want "us" to believe and accept your
self-qualifications on the judging of others and what is good for them.
You are a problem operator mostly for certain, as it is a great
probability that most act on the air in the manner they conduct
themselves in this forum

If that is true, then you must be a real

wing-ding

on the air.



That you worry (putting it mildly) about all you can not control,
producing extreme and profound inner feelings of impotence that manifest
in your attacks on usenet as a means of venting your frustrations with
myself and "society as a whole", has nothing to do with myself,
actually. You build your world around me

Hopefully Frank is wrong


Frank has been wrong all 12 names he called me..even when he has
"definitely" called me by name.

and you're not really a closet ham.
=A0

A shining example. I can say, when referring to "us", that my views are
much more in line with the average cber than your own. You run, as
always, when posed a question you are unable to provide for, such as
"Who do YOU profess to speak for when utilizing the term "us"?
(chuckle). Take your time,,

Tell Ray I said hi........


Sure,,,tell me what channel he rides or what his handle is and I'll 10-5
anyhting you can't communicate effectively yourself.
But then, of course, you must do something in return,,,tell Kimberly the
penchant you have for inquiring into people's personal lives and making
it your off-topic on usenet. She needs to understand when the crow comes
home to roost that such rules were initiated by yourself.


Dave

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cv

(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote in message ...
From: nojunk (Dave Hall)
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:57:07 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
From: nojunk (Dave Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: It has come to my attention
that all the manias you toss about as insult are the ones from which you
more than likely suffer. You typify theclassic projectionist and search
for more insults as you angrily

(snip)

Hey dave dont work to hard managing Twisty is like spinning a
basketball on the tip of your finger just a little tweak every so
often is all you need to keep it going

On 1 Jun 2004 16:28:24 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote in message ...
From: nojunk (Dave Hall)
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:57:07 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:
From: nojunk (Dave Hall)
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:20:02 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote: It has come to my attention
that all the manias you toss about as insult are the ones from which you
more than likely suffer. You typify theclassic projectionist and search
for more insults as you angrily

(snip)

Hey dave dont work to hard managing Twisty is like spinning a
basketball on the tip of your finger just a little tweak every so
often is all you need to keep it going


Heh, I can see that even after a long weekend (Of which most of it was
spent trying to come up with a clever comeback no doubt) he is still
seething in his meltdown. The longer, more verbose and scatterbrained
his posts become, the more obvious that this meltdown is occurring.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 14:21:11 -0400,
(Tampa Bay Always Kicks Philthy Azz) wrote:


YOU went off-topic and entered insults to this thread.

Where did I go off topic?


LOL...it has always been you. No matter how many times I redirect your
childlike mannerisms and attention deficit, you are unable to maintain
your original topic of erroneously claiming roger beeps are illegal on
cb. Such an obsession and disorder has you unable to focus on anything
but myself.

You are on those drugs again. Try adding to the topic instead of
trying to insult me and maybe you will learn something.



You did by mentioning a mental health professional, but such would
probably aid you in your dilemma in seeing nothing but the moral fabric
of society crashing in on your depression-filled life and world.


So you categorically deny that the moral compass of our society has
declined in the last few decades? Ask your buddy Jim in Rochester if
he feels that his neighborhood is as good as it was 25 years ago.


Ok then, which are you? a liar or a mental
case? Either you are what you project,
in which case it makes you a sociopath, or you
faked the whole "cartoon character" persona,


but entertaining thoughts to yourself that my usenet name may
somehow be a legal name and "real" to yourself to the point of wondering
aloud if the persona was "faked" or not, illustrates just exactly how
far over the edge you were pushed.

You're kidding right? Do you really take every word so literally?
Maybe that is the crux of your problem. Where did you get the idea
that I would be so ridiculous as to consider the name "Twistedhed" as
a legal name? No one said anything about that, only about the
personality which you project while using that pseudonym.

You've said time and time again that my diagnoses of your
psychological issues is based on what "you allow us to see". The
obvious conclusion one would draw from that statement is that you are
deliberately modifying your behavior on this newsgroup.

So I'll ask again, which are you a sociopath or a liar?





Well, gee, davie,,not only have you sealed your reputation as an Extra
who doesn't have a clues at all about rules and regulations pertaining
to cb radio (based on your hysterical claim that roger beeps are
illegal),

A roger beep was classified as an "amusement device" by the FCC over
20 years ago. Sorry but there was no google then, so no, I don't have
a "hard copy" to reference. If that has changed, that's news to me,
but I'm not above admitting if I am wrong. So prove me wrong and
provide me clarification that the FCC has re-thought its original
declaration.



The accomplished liar is yourself,,,your posts affirm such going all the
way back into the archives,,you have lied about the Phelps, a cber being
busted,

You have never proved that those statements are anything but the
truth. The fact that you accused me of lying about them does not prove
anything. The fact that you cannot find any information about the CBer
who got popped for disturbing the peace, merely reflects on your
inability to access information. That you refuse to accept my
explanation regarding an old repeater antenna is not proof either.



,,you claimed the FCC maintains the roger beep is a sound effect
device for amusement, but can not cite anything to back up any of your
claims.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The claim was made
over 20 years ago. I read it back then. I can't remember where
specifically. But because I can't bring it forth now, that makes me an
automatic liar in your book.

*


Not one person can come forward and claim I have wrongfully affronted
them.

What? You're kidding again right? You can't make a post without
attacking someone. I don't want to hear about "you're only giving it
back". Two wrongs don't make a right, and the fact that someone might
have been critical of your 5 years ago is not an excuse for you to
leave your civility at the front door every time you post something
now


I attack issues, not people

THAT is a crock. You can't separate the issues from the people. You
attack them, accuse them of having "communications deficits" (Among
other things), and then turn around and claim that you are only
defending yourself.

, until initiated. If defending a
position I present must encompass the attack of another by illustrating
their initial attacks, so be it.

Your definition of an "initial attack" is somewhat incredulous.


I don't mind getting down in the mud

Of course not, that's been your intention from day one. You need it to
feed your enormous appetite for attention.

while attacking others for the "crime" of speaking
about freebanding, actually are.

Freebanding IS a crime. A federal crime. And it remains so, despite
your 5 year attempt to deflect from that original topic. You are a
practicing criminal. You can't deal with the reality of that claim so
you deflect, obfuscate the truth, and go on the offensive by attacking
the harbingers of that truth in an attempt to tarnish the message by
knocking down the messengers. But, truth be told, even if you do
manage to silence the speakers of truth, you are STILL a practicing
criminal whether or not anyone else knows it or not.

, as the need for insulting
another merely for their opinions and views is highly indicative of a
character flaw AND low self-esteem.

I speak the truth. If the truth insults you, it's not my problem and
further reflective of your own psychological issues.

_
Such what makes you
a lid and a detriment to hammie radio. You're part of what is strangling
the hobby.

Care to elaborate on just what is "strangling"
the ham radio hobby?


You are. You are part of the problem, Elaborating will just cornfuse you
further,

Translation: "You have no clue, but it sounds good to make wild
claims".


If that is true, then you must be a real
wing-ding
on the air.



That you worry (putting it mildly) about all you can not control,
producing extreme and profound inner feelings of impotence that manifest
in your attacks on usenet as a means of venting your frustrations with
myself and "society as a whole", has nothing to do with myself,
actually.

That you felt this important enough to make yet a second response to
indicates the depth of your obsession.

A shining example. I can say, when referring to "us", that my views are
much more in line with the average cber than your own.

Once again, you cannot possible know what the "Average CBer's" views
are. You a just a simpleton living in a make believe world.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj