Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 16:26:51 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote in : "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message .. . Measure it. If you actually find this impedance "bump", maybe you can explain why impedance is so significant for these connectors You checked your E-mail? You have the detailed answer there in the attached zip file. Mailbox is empty. Did you remove the "nospam"? while impedance will "unnecessarily complicate things" for mag-mounts. You have "unnecessarily complicate things" because you don't understand the difference. Now that's an interesting answer..... the difference between impedance and capacitance is that I don't understand the difference? Are you saying that impedance is important for connectors but not for antenna grounds? See the file I sent to you. Checked again. Still empty. Why not fall back to your "pure capacitance" excuse where UHF connectors are concerned? Why don't you explain it. Alrighty..... Any capacitor is basically a network of capacitance, inductance and resistance. The circuit can't see the "pure capacitance" without seeing the inductance and resistance, hence the necessity of measuring a capacitor as an impedance since impedance = resistance + reactance. And because frequency is directly related to reactance, impedance changes in relation to frequency. The other issue to consider is the dielectric of the capacitance, which will affect the frequency linearity (Z/f curve) of the device. For all practical purposes, only vacuum and air capacitors are linear in this respect -- all others are not. This means that as the frequency changes, so will the resistance and/or 'pure' capacitance, or both. And this is why you -must- measure impedance at the operating frequency. As far as connectors are concerned, both N-type and UHF-type connectors are low-impedance coaxial designs, so unless the wavelength is a few cm or higher there will be little or no reflection due to impedance mismatch (assuming there -is- an impedance mismatch). With that out of the way, the insulation is the other cause of concern. It is effectively the dielectric of the capacitance between the center conductor and the shield. So in this respect, the quality of the connector depends on the quality of the insulation. Cheap insulation will have poor high-frequency characteristics, while.... well, you get the idea. So if there is power loss it will be due to poor insulation properties (cheap materials, contamination, etc.). And -that- is why the N-type connectors are preferred for UHF and up since it is (or rather, it's -supposed- to be) a sealed connector, thereby preventing humidity and other crud from contaminating the dielectric (or corroding the contacts) and therefore causing power loss. There you have it. It's ironic that while impedance is the primary factor in both these issues, you have misunderstood both from totally opposite ends of the spectrum. But hey, nobody's perfect. Funny why "N" connectors and other "constant impedance" connectors are used at UHF almost exclusively. Make up your mind, Leland. What's important -- impedance or 'pure capacitance'? Its very clear to me Frank. What is also clear is you don't. Checked again. Mailbox is still empty. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
custom antenna mounts | CB |