Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:37:04 -0500, "DR. Death"
wrote in : snip The bulletin uses a 1N4997 diode for D2 and a 33 ohm for R4. The construction hints uses a MJE243 Transistor for D2 as they state the 1N4997 is no longer available and R4 as 82 ohms. The 63R resistor parts set has it at 47 ohms. So the choice I think would be either the 47 or 82 ohm. It looks like the resistors were chosen based on the characteristics of the respective device, so keeping the match would probably be the best choice. IOW, use the 82 ohm resistor with the MJE243 and the 33 ohm resistor with the 1N4997. I was able to find a 1N4997 replacement NTE5800 and might try it with the 33 ohm as the MJE243 will be a bit harder to install as it goes between the PCB and heat sink and has to have a spacer. Avoid generic replacements. Unless it's reverse-referenced as the original component, it may not be a drop-in replacement and is not likely to have the same specifications as the original. Besides, using the MJE243 is, IMPO, a better choice than the 1N4997 for a couple reasons: First, as a diode it will have forward voltage drop (bias regulation) similar to the emitter-base characteristics of the power transistors (mainly because it -is- a power transistor); and second, because it will have a better thermal connection with the heat-sink providing bias regulation with improved thermal tracking. That is, of course, assuming you are able to mount it physically close to the power transistors. And when you mount it, use just a very thin film of heat-sink grease -- avoid the "more-is-better" mentality. Thanks for your input, if the 1N4997 doesn't work like expected I'll give the series parallel a try. Using multiple resistors is an excellent idea. If the 33 ohm resistor is used the power dissipated by the resistor will be slightly greater than the 5 watt rating specified -- it would be much better to have a resistor (or resistors) rated for 10 watts or more. Also, mount that resistor (as well as the base resistors R5 and R6) slightly above the board (1/8" to 1/4") or the heat will cook the board and the foil will fall off. The extra wire also helps dissipate heat. There was also the suggestion to use a Dale, but that's really just a waste of money in this case -- the input impedance of the transistors is so low that feedback from stray RF isn't going to be a problem. Another issue: While looking at the schematic I was suprised to see that there isn't a choke between the bias supply and the input transformer -- there -really- needs to be one there! At the very least, add a few beads on the wire from the center-tap of the input transformer. A nice torroid or hash choke would be even better. Anyway, while you are building this thing, keep in mind that it is a very basic circuit (i.e, primitive, uninproved, bare-bones), so don't expect much. And yes, it -will- need a filter. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
... On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:37:04 -0500, "DR. Death" wrote in : snip The bulletin uses a 1N4997 diode for D2 and a 33 ohm for R4. The construction hints uses a MJE243 Transistor for D2 as they state the 1N4997 is no longer available and R4 as 82 ohms. The 63R resistor parts set has it at 47 ohms. So the choice I think would be either the 47 or 82 ohm. It looks like the resistors were chosen based on the characteristics of the respective device, so keeping the match would probably be the best choice. IOW, use the 82 ohm resistor with the MJE243 and the 33 ohm resistor with the 1N4997. I was able to find a 1N4997 replacement NTE5800 and might try it with the 33 ohm as the MJE243 will be a bit harder to install as it goes between the PCB and heat sink and has to have a spacer. Avoid generic replacements. Unless it's reverse-referenced as the original component, it may not be a drop-in replacement and is not likely to have the same specifications as the original. Besides, using the MJE243 is, IMPO, a better choice than the 1N4997 for a couple reasons: First, as a diode it will have forward voltage drop (bias regulation) similar to the emitter-base characteristics of the power transistors (mainly because it -is- a power transistor); and second, because it will have a better thermal connection with the heat-sink providing bias regulation with improved thermal tracking. That is, of course, assuming you are able to mount it physically close to the power transistors. And when you mount it, use just a very thin film of heat-sink grease -- avoid the "more-is-better" mentality. The MJE243 mounts close to the power transistors. The hints say to use a mica washer and coumpound. I was certainly a little concerned with using replacement 1N4997. Thanks for your input, if the 1N4997 doesn't work like expected I'll give the series parallel a try. Using multiple resistors is an excellent idea. If the 33 ohm resistor is used the power dissipated by the resistor will be slightly greater than the 5 watt rating specified -- it would be much better to have a resistor (or resistors) rated for 10 watts or more. Also, mount that resistor (as well as the base resistors R5 and R6) slightly above the board (1/8" to 1/4") or the heat will cook the board and the foil will fall off. The extra wire also helps dissipate heat. Glad you mentioned that. I would have mounted them against the board. There was also the suggestion to use a Dale, but that's really just a waste of money in this case -- the input impedance of the transistors is so low that feedback from stray RF isn't going to be a problem. Another issue: While looking at the schematic I was suprised to see that there isn't a choke between the bias supply and the input transformer -- there -really- needs to be one there! At the very least, add a few beads on the wire from the center-tap of the input transformer. A nice torroid or hash choke would be even better. When I bought the transformer set it came with the beads and wire and the hints tell where to put the choke. Anyway, while you are building this thing, keep in mind that it is a very basic circuit (i.e, primitive, uninproved, bare-bones), so don't expect much. And yes, it -will- need a filter. LOL, no doubt. I have a pretty good low pass in line filter that I will use. Thanks for the info Frank. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EB63 Amplifier Kit again | Homebrew | |||
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database , Update Jan_2004 | Dx | |||
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database , Update Jan_2004 | Dx | |||
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database, November 2003 Update | Dx | |||
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database, November 2003 Update | Dx |