Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 04, 01:07 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:37:04 -0500, "DR. Death"
wrote in
:

snip
The bulletin uses a 1N4997 diode for D2 and a 33 ohm for R4. The
construction hints uses a MJE243 Transistor for D2 as they state the 1N4997
is no longer available and R4 as 82 ohms. The 63R resistor parts set has it
at 47 ohms. So the choice I think would be either the 47 or 82 ohm.



It looks like the resistors were chosen based on the characteristics
of the respective device, so keeping the match would probably be the
best choice. IOW, use the 82 ohm resistor with the MJE243 and the 33
ohm resistor with the 1N4997.


I was able to find a 1N4997 replacement NTE5800 and might try it with the 33
ohm as the MJE243 will be a bit harder to install as it goes between the PCB
and heat sink and has to have a spacer.



Avoid generic replacements. Unless it's reverse-referenced as the
original component, it may not be a drop-in replacement and is not
likely to have the same specifications as the original. Besides, using
the MJE243 is, IMPO, a better choice than the 1N4997 for a couple
reasons: First, as a diode it will have forward voltage drop (bias
regulation) similar to the emitter-base characteristics of the power
transistors (mainly because it -is- a power transistor); and second,
because it will have a better thermal connection with the heat-sink
providing bias regulation with improved thermal tracking. That is, of
course, assuming you are able to mount it physically close to the
power transistors. And when you mount it, use just a very thin film of
heat-sink grease -- avoid the "more-is-better" mentality.


Thanks for your input, if the 1N4997
doesn't work like expected I'll give the series parallel a try.



Using multiple resistors is an excellent idea. If the 33 ohm resistor
is used the power dissipated by the resistor will be slightly greater
than the 5 watt rating specified -- it would be much better to have a
resistor (or resistors) rated for 10 watts or more. Also, mount that
resistor (as well as the base resistors R5 and R6) slightly above the
board (1/8" to 1/4") or the heat will cook the board and the foil will
fall off. The extra wire also helps dissipate heat.

There was also the suggestion to use a Dale, but that's really just a
waste of money in this case -- the input impedance of the transistors
is so low that feedback from stray RF isn't going to be a problem.

Another issue: While looking at the schematic I was suprised to see
that there isn't a choke between the bias supply and the input
transformer -- there -really- needs to be one there! At the very
least, add a few beads on the wire from the center-tap of the input
transformer. A nice torroid or hash choke would be even better.

Anyway, while you are building this thing, keep in mind that it is a
very basic circuit (i.e, primitive, uninproved, bare-bones), so don't
expect much. And yes, it -will- need a filter.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 04, 05:40 AM
DR. Death
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:37:04 -0500, "DR. Death"
wrote in
:

snip
The bulletin uses a 1N4997 diode for D2 and a 33 ohm for R4. The
construction hints uses a MJE243 Transistor for D2 as they state the

1N4997
is no longer available and R4 as 82 ohms. The 63R resistor parts set has

it
at 47 ohms. So the choice I think would be either the 47 or 82 ohm.



It looks like the resistors were chosen based on the characteristics
of the respective device, so keeping the match would probably be the
best choice. IOW, use the 82 ohm resistor with the MJE243 and the 33
ohm resistor with the 1N4997.


I was able to find a 1N4997 replacement NTE5800 and might try it with the

33
ohm as the MJE243 will be a bit harder to install as it goes between the

PCB
and heat sink and has to have a spacer.



Avoid generic replacements. Unless it's reverse-referenced as the
original component, it may not be a drop-in replacement and is not
likely to have the same specifications as the original. Besides, using
the MJE243 is, IMPO, a better choice than the 1N4997 for a couple
reasons: First, as a diode it will have forward voltage drop (bias
regulation) similar to the emitter-base characteristics of the power
transistors (mainly because it -is- a power transistor); and second,
because it will have a better thermal connection with the heat-sink
providing bias regulation with improved thermal tracking. That is, of
course, assuming you are able to mount it physically close to the
power transistors. And when you mount it, use just a very thin film of
heat-sink grease -- avoid the "more-is-better" mentality.


The MJE243 mounts close to the power transistors. The hints say to use a
mica washer and coumpound. I was certainly a little concerned with using
replacement 1N4997.

Thanks for your input, if the 1N4997
doesn't work like expected I'll give the series parallel a try.



Using multiple resistors is an excellent idea. If the 33 ohm resistor
is used the power dissipated by the resistor will be slightly greater
than the 5 watt rating specified -- it would be much better to have a
resistor (or resistors) rated for 10 watts or more. Also, mount that
resistor (as well as the base resistors R5 and R6) slightly above the
board (1/8" to 1/4") or the heat will cook the board and the foil will
fall off. The extra wire also helps dissipate heat.

Glad you mentioned that. I would have mounted them against the board.

There was also the suggestion to use a Dale, but that's really just a
waste of money in this case -- the input impedance of the transistors
is so low that feedback from stray RF isn't going to be a problem.

Another issue: While looking at the schematic I was suprised to see
that there isn't a choke between the bias supply and the input
transformer -- there -really- needs to be one there! At the very
least, add a few beads on the wire from the center-tap of the input
transformer. A nice torroid or hash choke would be even better.

When I bought the transformer set it came with the beads and wire and the
hints tell where to put the choke.

Anyway, while you are building this thing, keep in mind that it is a
very basic circuit (i.e, primitive, uninproved, bare-bones), so don't
expect much. And yes, it -will- need a filter.

LOL, no doubt. I have a pretty good low pass in line filter that I will use.
Thanks for the info Frank.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EB63 Amplifier Kit again Chris Homebrew 0 October 3rd 04 02:12 PM
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database , Update Jan_2004 Norbert Graf Dx 4 January 11th 04 05:24 PM
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database , Update Jan_2004 Norbert Graf Dx 0 January 8th 04 09:46 AM
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database, November 2003 Update Norbert Graf Dx 0 November 23rd 03 06:29 PM
ON6DP QSL-Manager Database, November 2003 Update Norbert Graf Dx 0 November 23rd 03 06:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017