That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be VERY
different.

Don

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On 27 Oct 2004 23:50:37 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 27 Oct 2004 15:48:49 -0700, (Stephen) wrote
in :

He will anyway. Wouldn't you if you had the wife he has??????

Aw, come on, she's pretty hot for her age. But his daughter -- now
that's a different story. Mighty tasty AND she has some brains. In
fact, I think she did a better job in the spin room than her dad did
in the debate!

The choices suck canal water. This is the best we have!!??


www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be
VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.


And what happened to the revolt against the electoral college after the last
election?

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:09:21 -0400, "M-Tech"
wrote in :

That's easy to do when you only answer to 3% of the population. If you
depended on pleasing over 50%(to get re-elected), his answers would be
VERY
different.


If over 50% of the voters made their choices based on facts and logic
instead of picking the candidate that makes them "feel good", his
answers wouldn't need to be ANY different.

I can't add anything to that except...NO KIDDING!!!

Don