I stated that there are illegal stations on

channel 6 based on my own empirical

observations.


No. That is what you added and REstated after your first claim was
proved bull****.

Twist claimed that my statement is "bull****".


And you proved it.

So if my statement that there are illegal

operators on channel 6 is invalid,


That was not your claim, although you are very desperate to try and sell
it that way.
Your claim, whcih you continue to snip, was that all the "evidence" you
needed was the reputation of channel as the "dregs of the society" to
know they are illegal. Move on, Dave. Your beck-pedal failed.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:00:52 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

I stated that there are illegal stations on

channel 6 based on my own empirical

observations.


No. That is what you added and REstated after your first claim was
proved bull****.

Twist claimed that my statement is "bull****".


And you proved it.

So if my statement that there are illegal

operators on channel 6 is invalid,


That was not your claim, although you are very desperate to try and sell
it that way.
Your claim, whcih you continue to snip, was that all the "evidence" you
needed was the reputation of channel as the "dregs of the society" to
know they are illegal. Move on, Dave. Your beck-pedal failed.

As usual, your penchant for misunderstanding the written word is
glaringly apparent.

So eat your crow in peace.

Dave
"Sandbagger"