On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:57:49 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

N3CVJ wrote:
That was back when you were on my side,

before you found out that I'm one of those

"evil" capitalist loving conservatives who still

believes in personal responsibility.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj


Your "side" indicates an intentional adversarial position. Everything
isn't right or wrong and this side or that side of an issue...seeing
everything as black and white is myopic. Stop looking for "sides" in
which to take and stand on your own feet....for once.

I'm not the one displaying binary thinking. I never claimed that
issues are either ones or zeroes. But there is an overall difference
in philosophy between one "side" and the other, a cumulative sum of
all the individual "issues".

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:57:49 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
N3CVJ wrote:
That was back when you were on my side,

before you found out that I'm one of those

"evil" capitalist loving conservatives who still

believes in personal responsibility.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Your "side" indicates an intentional adversarial position. Everything
isn't right or wrong and this side or that side of an issue...seeing
everything as black and white is myopic. Stop looking for "sides" in
which to take and stand on your own feet....for once.

I'm not the one displaying binary thinking.


Your "side" indicates an intentional adversarial position.

I never claimed that issues are either ones or

zeroes.


Step away from your spaceship.

But there is an overall difference in

philosophy between one "side" and the other,

a cumulative sum of all the individual "issues".

Dave

"Sandbagger"


Nevertheless, calling it "your" side indicates your predisposition to an
intentional adversarial position. This is not a desirable trait and
prevents you from displaying competent communicative technique.