Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge" wrote in message ... "U Know Who" wrote in news:FchHd.29613$_56.24484 @fe2.texas.rr.com: ETS is not a subaudible tone, but in fact a roger beep. At any rate, I emailed Riley. We'll let him answer if he chooses. How is a SUB - Audible tone a roger Beep Randy you are arguing over things you dont even know the defenition of. Go back and read your posts. YOU are the one that said ETS was a SUB-audible tone. Maybe you didn't mean to, but you did say that. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Roger Beeps 100% ILLEGAL | CB | |||
Roger Wiseman Dictionary 2005 Edition | General | |||
Why are Roger Beeps Illegal on CB? | CB | |||
N3CVJ claims Roger Beeps illegal | CB |