Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:14:14 -0500, Ham Guy wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:02:00 GMT, Assneck Johnson wrote: I wonder how many freebanders have ham licenses... Dave responds with: Quite a few according to many of the more recent FCC enforcement actions. It would seem that the FCC is more likely to pop a licensed ham for operating out of their assigned bands, than they are in popping an unlicensed radio pirate. If you are going to freeband, having a ham license may actually be detrimental. The reason freebanding is as rampant as it is is that the FCC is simply not affecting all that many people. The chances of getting popped are very slim, and they usually give you a warning first, which gives you a chance to pull the plug. Freebanding is a violation of federal radio law, but without effective enforcement, that earns very little respect among those who pursue it. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj Dave, you type this above, then type this 4 minutes later. Make up your mind: Assuming freebanders have ham licenses. Most don't. Any ham who works H.F. knows that conditions vary between the bands. If DX is the name of the game, those who are rabid about it, will seek out whatever avenues exist to achieve that goal. From a propagation standpoint, there is little difference in conditions between 10, 11 and 12 meters. But there are far more operators on 11 meters at any given time, so there are more chances to make that "rare" contact. That doesn't make it right, but it does explain why. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Landshark wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:14:14 -0500, Ham Guy wrote: On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:02:00 GMT, Assneck Johnson wrote: I wonder how many freebanders have ham licenses... Dave responds with: Quite a few according to many of the more recent FCC enforcement actions. It would seem that the FCC is more likely to pop a licensed ham for operating out of their assigned bands, than they are in popping an unlicensed radio pirate. If you are going to freeband, having a ham license may actually be detrimental. The reason freebanding is as rampant as it is is that the FCC is simply not affecting all that many people. The chances of getting popped are very slim, and they usually give you a warning first, which gives you a chance to pull the plug. Freebanding is a violation of federal radio law, but without effective enforcement, that earns very little respect among those who pursue it. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj Dave, you type this above, then type this 4 minutes later. Make up your mind Yes, Dave, make up your mind. You are going to lose friends among the freebanders if you say anything is wrong with it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cheap ass hams | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Why don't I ever hear these complaints about other hams? | Policy | |||
Ham radio's REAL ememy | Policy |