On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:29:27 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
As most of you know, there has been some

question as to the legality of Roger Beeps on

CB radio.

There has never been any question as to the legality of roger beeps by
anyone, cber or hammie, other than yourself.

Some have claimed that they are legal,


Everyone that chimed in on the issue had tried telling you roger beeps
were legal.

No, not everyone. There was no definitive rule that specifically
allowed them. Therefore the claim that they were legal was based on
pure speculation only.

But it's water under the bridge now. The FCC has spoken.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:24 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:29:27 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
As most of you know, there has been some

question as to the legality of Roger Beeps on

CB radio.

There has never been any question as to the legality of roger beeps by
anyone, cber or hammie, other than yourself.

Some have claimed that they are legal,


Everyone that chimed in on the issue had tried telling you roger beeps
were legal.

No, not everyone. There was no definitive rule that specifically
allowed them. Therefore the claim that they were legal was based on
pure speculation only.


There's no definitive rule that allows chrome knobs and black paint on
CB radios, either. The problem is your warped logic, Dave -- absence
of evidence does -not- constitute proof of the opposite. When are you
going to realize this fundamental flaw in your thought process?






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:59:24 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :


On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:29:27 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:


From: (Dave Hall)

As most of you know, there has been some

question as to the legality of Roger Beeps on

CB radio.

There has never been any question as to the legality of roger beeps by
anyone, cber or hammie, other than yourself.


Some have claimed that they are legal,


Everyone that chimed in on the issue had tried telling you roger beeps
were legal.

No, not everyone. There was no definitive rule that specifically
allowed them. Therefore the claim that they were legal was based on
pure speculation only.



There's no definitive rule that allows chrome knobs and black paint on
CB radios, either. The problem is your warped logic, Dave -- absence
of evidence does -not- constitute proof of the opposite. When are you
going to realize this fundamental flaw in your thought process?






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
When are you two going to give it a rest? You are both radio intelligent
but seem to enjoy the nonsense that is akin to the george & doug vs
steve/shark/randy crap that is on this board.

jim wrote:
but seem to enjoy the nonsense that is akin to the george & doug vs
steve/shark/randy crap that is on this board.

Sorry man. Fell free to kill-filter me if what I say bothers you. I've
filtered some google **** but it ain't over, Jim.

It's the love of the common man. ($1 Todd)

--
http://NewsReader.Com 30 GB/Month

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:57:24 -0500, jim wrote
in :

snip
When are you two going to give it a rest? You are both radio intelligent
but seem to enjoy the nonsense that is akin to the george & doug vs
steve/shark/randy crap that is on this board.


I gotta agree with Stevo on this one, Jim. In the jargon of Bush: We
have resolve and we will prevail at any cost. BTW, have you registered
for the draft yet?





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:57:24 -0500, jim
wrote:

When are you two going to give it a rest? You are both radio intelligent
but seem to enjoy the nonsense that is akin to the george & doug vs
steve/shark/randy crap that is on this board.

It'll end when Frank finally realizes that I'm his evil twin.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:57:24 -0500, jim wrote:
When are you two going to give it a rest? You are both radio intelligent
but seem to enjoy the nonsense that is akin to the george & doug vs
steve/shark/randy crap that is on this board.

It'll end when Frank finally realizes that I'm his

evil twin.

David T. Hall Jr.

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"



No way! In the strangest of ways, Frank has an integrity that has never
been compromised. He has remained true to his "core beliefs" throughout
his posting history and the majority of his posts serve as testament
that he rarely contradicts himself.

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:03:09 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

No, not everyone. There was no definitive rule that specifically
allowed them. Therefore the claim that they were legal was based on
pure speculation only.


There's no definitive rule that allows chrome knobs and black paint on
CB radios, either. The problem is your warped logic, Dave -- absence
of evidence does -not- constitute proof of the opposite. When are you
going to realize this fundamental flaw in your thought process?

So you never believed that noise toys were illegal? Could not the use
of a Roger Beep not be addressed in 95.412 and 95.413?

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:42 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:03:09 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

No, not everyone. There was no definitive rule that specifically
allowed them. Therefore the claim that they were legal was based on
pure speculation only.


There's no definitive rule that allows chrome knobs and black paint on
CB radios, either. The problem is your warped logic, Dave -- absence
of evidence does -not- constitute proof of the opposite. When are you
going to realize this fundamental flaw in your thought process?

So you never believed that noise toys were illegal? Could not the use
of a Roger Beep not be addressed in 95.412 and 95.413?


Only if you define it as such. The FCC doesn't, which should have been
painfully clear when it was proven that they authorized a CB radio
with the feature.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:20:45 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:42 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:03:09 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

No, not everyone. There was no definitive rule that specifically
allowed them. Therefore the claim that they were legal was based on
pure speculation only.


There's no definitive rule that allows chrome knobs and black paint on
CB radios, either. The problem is your warped logic, Dave -- absence
of evidence does -not- constitute proof of the opposite. When are you
going to realize this fundamental flaw in your thought process?

So you never believed that noise toys were illegal? Could not the use
of a Roger Beep not be addressed in 95.412 and 95.413?


Only if you define it as such. The FCC doesn't, which should have been
painfully clear when it was proven that they authorized a CB radio
with the feature.

Galaxy has a reputation for "pushing the limit" when it comes to
radios and their legalities. Just look at their list of "export"
radios. The fact that most mainstream radios did NOT have such a
feature was enough for me to remain suspicious. I was also informed by
an FCC official 20-some years back that they considered any "tone or
noise" not specifically addressed in 95.412 (b) to be illegal.
Obviously that feeling is no longer true, but it was the basis for my
initial feeling on the subject.

But I stand corrected now.

Dave
"Sandbagger"