About Us

March 2nd 05, 03:31 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:21:05 -0600, itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
news:9507-42249354-37 @storefull-3257.bay.webtv.net:
The line you posted above is in direct contradiction with the previous
line you posted. For instance, above, your passage claims 55 MPH as the
determining factor and speed, yet your previous passage gives no speed
at all, and makes only reference to a speed recorded in excess of 6 MPH
over the limit as the determining factor. Both sentences cite the same
law, same paragraph applications, yet have two separate conclusions.
They both can't be right.

I'm tired of wasting my time on this issue.

That's because of your stubborn refusal to learn and ignorance insisting
no one else can be right besides you, despite the number of people that
continually correct you.

He doesn't get it. He can't understand

conditionals, and that's why he feels there's an
apparent "contradiction" between paragraph 2

and 3 devices.

There is,,,,and you are unable to comprehend it.

The law is the law,

..and you simply aren't up to date on it, despite your cries and whines
about how it's your state and you know about the law. Same thing you
said regarding the law about your hobby that you know nothing of and
have to be shown, such as your claim that roger beeps were illegal based
on your inability to find a law specifically permitting them.

and it specifies the

conditions by which a speed tolerance is

required to be given, which is most of the time.

See what you are iunable to comprehend..

The minimum tolerance is 5 MPH,

Wrong,,,

and in certain other situations (Below 55 MPH

and using electronic devices OTHER than

RADAR), they have to increase that tolerance

to 10 MPH. It's not contradictory, it's in

addition to.

No,,it's not.

Your amended statutes also illustrate that no
points are to be assigned until 10 MPH or
more over, but it does not say that you can't
be stopped and ticketed between 5 and 10
MPH over in a radar zone.

Twisty's interpretive skills are not much better

than my 5 year old's.

Although your need to be insultive is based upon your own incompetence
and ignorance, ithere is no excuse for such when you are taught better
each day by cber's who do know the law better than yourself. Perhaps you
can get your five year old to explain to you what everyone comprehends.

It's no wonder he thinks the various laws

mean something different than what they

actually state, to those of us who CAN

interpret and comprehend what we read.

Too bad these reading skills you speak of
have prevented you from finding the current law.

David T. Hall Jr. N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Chicago's super jock Larry Lujack inducted into Radio Hall of Fame	Mike Terry	Broadcasting	0	November 7th 04 04:40 PM
Radio Hall of Fame Set To Induct 5 More Legends	Mike Terry	Broadcasting	0	October 30th 04 05:28 PM
Twistedhed attacking Dave Hall AGAIN	Snow Cone	CB	13	February 23rd 04 01:36 AM
What Do Twistedhed and Dave Hall have in common?	Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup	CB	5	December 30th 03 10:41 PM
Twistednuts resumes his DAVE HALL OBSESSION again!	Citizens For A Keyclown-Free Newsgroup	CB	1	November 28th 03 03:48 PM

Menu

About Us