Hmmm, actually, that "freeband antenna" is operating on under my ham license
on 10 meters... The bandwidth of that ant is too narrow for freeband
work...
I use a beacon on Mt. Diablo in the San Joaquin Valley as a signal source
for ant testing... it operates 24/7 on Channel 14 on CB... sends the call
"AOH" @ 7 WPM repetitively...
You need to follow the conversations closer... perhaps you do need me to
bottom post...

Regards,
John

"Lancer" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:51:28 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

If that is true, they CERTAINLY would not care about CB--they do!!!
Get real or chat with others who have no respect for reality...

John

Your own experience would prove otherwise. You asked a lot of
questions about your freeband antenna in the amateur.antenna group.

No one put you down or batted an eye over it.

You could have ask the same questions about a "cb" antennas in that
group and received the answers that you were looking for.

Get Real?

Whatever John, your just looking for an arguement...

Have a nice day..

Lancer wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:10:03 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then it
was another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been
'em...

I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we
can be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the
truth--let the chips fall where they might...

I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Regards,
John


John;
So what was the intent of your original post?

The truth is most hams don't care about "freeband"

I also brought lunch, plus a 12 pack...

Hand me one of those please, Lance...no not that, a sandwich!

--
Well it ain't the first close call I ever had as I'm sure you already know.
I had some help from you Lord and the devil himself, but it's been strictly
touch and go. Steve Earle

Lancer wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005 03:30:18 GMT, Steveo wrote:

"John Smith" wrote:
I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Then please don't top post so much.

Why? Everyone knows that its normal to read from bottom to top..

A. Cuz if ****s up the thread.
Q. What's wrong with top posting?

--
Well it ain't the first close call I ever had as I'm sure you already know.
I had some help from you Lord and the devil himself, but it's been strictly
touch and go. Steve Earle

"John Smith" wrote:
If that is true, they CERTAINLY would not care about CB--they do!!!
Get real or chat with others who have no respect for reality...

John

Stfu, top posting twit.


"Lancer" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:10:03 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then
it was
another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been 'em...

I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we
can
be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the
truth--let the
chips fall where they might...

I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Regards,
John


John;
So what was the intent of your original post?

The truth is most hams don't care about "freeband"

I also brought lunch, plus a 12 pack...

--
Well it ain't the first close call I ever had as I'm sure you already know.
I had some help from you Lord and the devil himself, but it's been strictly
touch and go. Steve Earle

On 26 Apr 2005 16:19:56 GMT, Steveo wrote:

Lancer wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005 03:30:18 GMT, Steveo wrote:

"John Smith" wrote:
I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Then please don't top post so much.

Why? Everyone knows that its normal to read from bottom to top..

A. Cuz if ****s up the thread.
Q. What's wrong with top posting?

LOL!! Good Example...

On 26 Apr 2005 16:18:38 GMT, Steveo wrote:

Lancer wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:10:03 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then it
was another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been
'em...

I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we
can be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the
truth--let the chips fall where they might...

I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Regards,
John


John;
So what was the intent of your original post?

The truth is most hams don't care about "freeband"

I also brought lunch, plus a 12 pack...

Hand me one of those please, Lance...no not that, a sandwich!

I thought beer was a liquid sandwich..?

On that subject, do they sell Negro Modelo up in your neck of the
woods?

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:42:36 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Hmmm, actually, that "freeband antenna" is operating on under my ham license
on 10 meters... The bandwidth of that ant is too narrow for freeband
work...
I use a beacon on Mt. Diablo in the San Joaquin Valley as a signal source
for ant testing... it operates 24/7 on Channel 14 on CB... sends the call
"AOH" @ 7 WPM repetitively...
You need to follow the conversations closer... perhaps you do need me to
bottom post...

Regards,
John


Your antenna is licensed?

I plotted your antenna, it easily has a 1 meg bandwidth.

Try bottom posting, you stand a better chance of understanding your
own posts..

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:59:04 GMT, JustÃ*n Käse
wrote:

In posted on Tue, 26
Apr 2005 16:47:42 GMT, Lancer wrote:

On 26 Apr 2005 16:19:56 GMT, Steveo wrote:

Lancer wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005 03:30:18 GMT, Steveo wrote:

"John Smith" wrote:
I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Then please don't top post so much.

Why? Everyone knows that its normal to read from bottom to top..

A. Cuz if ****s up the thread.
Q. What's wrong with top posting?

LOL!! Good Example...

http://tinyurl.com/cta3q

Too Funny... thanks...

I as I said, exercise your free speech as you choose...
If you come up with anything intelligent/interesting--I'll be here...

Regards,
John

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:47:55 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in
:

You my friend, are an idiot!!!


So I've been told on more than one occasion. But let's see what's in
-your- post......


Most hams feel it takes a "musical ear" to be proficient with morse code--


Really? I've never heard that from -any- ham. I know Morse myself and
I wouldn't say it takes a musical ear, but then I'm not a ham -or- a
musician. So do you have any references to back up your statement that
"most hams" feel this way?


snip
50Mhz and above works best with bounce, with enough power


Really? I've never heard that, either. So if I want to talk to someone
across town on, say, 2m, I should forget the repeaters, crank up the
amp and howl at the moon?


(and there is
something wrong with the ionosphere these days--holes yanno!) I suppose
bounce at 27Mhz is a possibility--however, how many other cb'ers would
have
a ant pointed at the moon?


The ozone hole(s) might make a difference on 11m if you happen to live
in Nome, AK, but I doubt that the mainland US is going to see a big
difference anytime soon. As long as skip continues to happen then the
ionosphere is still in good shape, and you probably won't have too
much luck with CB EME.

But that didn't answer my question: Have you done moon bounce with CB?


Expect no more answers from me--you are not on a level to be given this
consideration. You are simply displaying the traits of a control freak,
and
attempting to use cheap shots to make others answerable to you--I have not
the time--be interesting or be silent...


Your cop-out came earlier than I expected, but it -was- expected.


I can clearly see you have the petty traits most hams display--you may be
a
lost soul... get your license!


By "petty traits" do you mean pointing out the absurdity of the
arguments you use to defend your anti-hammie attitude? Guilty as
charged.


You are entitled to your opinions, if you think you will upset me with
your
rantings--think again...


I really don't care if you get upset or not. Why did you even bring it
up as a topic of discussion?


I support free speech....


As do I. I even consider it a right.


however, if you have no
respect for logic and the obivious it will show and you will be known for
such--proceed as you please...


....."logic and the obvious"? Like avoiding sat-comm because of
possible alien influence? And working moon bounce on CB? Of course you
realize that the moon is a natural satellite complete with alien mud
puddles, don't you? Then there is your statement that only musicians
can learn Morse code, your anti-government diatribe that came out of
nowhere, and your suggestion that education is a bad thing because it
will inevitably lead to Hitleresque facism in the US. "Logic and the
obvious" indeed.

John, you are a certifiable whacko. Welcome to RRCB!







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

Create a msg rule and auto-delete my posts--it'll be easier on ya...

John

"Steveo" wrote in message
...
Lancer wrote:
On 26 Apr 2005 03:30:18 GMT, Steveo wrote:

"John Smith" wrote:
I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch...

Then please don't top post so much.

Why? Everyone knows that its normal to read from bottom to top..

A. Cuz if ****s up the thread.
Q. What's wrong with top posting?

--
Well it ain't the first close call I ever had as I'm sure you already
know.
I had some help from you Lord and the devil himself, but it's been
strictly
touch and go. Steve Earle