Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 03:22 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, you are just ONE BIG argument for more control. The least gov't is
the best gov't, 400 million people need the radio spectrum more than a
handful of hams and the public servants we have hired to the people
business.

Write your congressman today! He will do nothing unless he knows there is a
problem!

Regards,
John


  #82   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 03:34 PM
Steveo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Smith" wrote:
I think too much text probably confuses old steveo, we should just keep
our thext to "yes" and "no" for him...

Regards,
John

Top posting nit-wit "John Smith" has nothing to say anyway.
  #84   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 03:44 PM
Steveo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

KB3BEJ chrissy the sissy busch
wrote:
Steveo is the only assclown to complain about top posters

STFU, sissy.

Since December 12 2004

pam wrote:
I live in Long Island and I am a ******


pam wrote:
Listen I dont speak on dougs behalf


pam wrote:
Your wife liked how i act, she said I am a bigger man than you, in more
ways than one.


pam wrote:
where is your address assclown I have a plane ticket waiting for a
destination.


pam wrote:
Hey Randy your not tookeen with the bitches didnt you just get dumped by
your old lady? I heard it was for cheating on her, with a sheep.


pam wrote:
That would be Steve parks wife she sucks a mean cock down in the medina
school yards. .. 10-4


pam wrote:
Of course it is a forge these cbers are real moron's


pam wrote:
Hey Steveo, why dont you reach down between your legs and see if you have
any balls


pam wrote:
come to your house unexpectedly and punk slap you.


pam wrote:
correctional Facility i am locked up.


pam wrote:
beat it Nagger,beat it nagger your reaching again..
Nagger you are a liar,
they say i am george busch now what is it nagger boi,


pam wrote:
he is a rolling rock drinker and Lancer is a cum slurper. Now watch
him trip over himself repying to this message.


pam wrote:
LOL ice cold Piece of **** Nagger you are too funny


pam wrote:
you ****in queer asshole. You are a transexual lover


pam wrote:
cocksucker your a ****ing Nagger


pam wrote:
you ****ing assclown pussy by loser... There isnt a god damn thing yoiu
can do about it except whimper and cry like the big faggot you are.. hey
Steve Parks,,, go **** yopurself you no nutsack loser.


pam wrote:
thats because mondays you are off sucking dick for a living.


pam wrote:
I am not a rascist I am a skin head.


pam wrote:
I banged his old lady and it smelled like the suez canal


pam wrote:
besides I have a trojan on your computer and I know when you post,
ever heard ofsub seven??


pam wrote:
Perhaps I have her pussy smells like a bad clam bake,
face it you like men and everything about them.


pam wrote:
yeah now suck my dick you assclown.


pam wrote:
Now hurry run along and sent those complaints to comcast.


pam wrote:
after you tear it up for awhile, yes it smells like men's dick.


pam wrote:
Insane in the membrane.


pam wrote:
Well pussy boi Parks your wife seems to think I got
something on you, get over it. she wants a man, not you.


pam wrote:
That is real funny you stupid piece of dog ****


pam wrote:
you limp wristed faggot. In an effort to suck dick



pam wrote:
did you have semen in your eye Land****?


pam wrote:
You queer assclown


pam wrote:
do you enjoy sucking his dick that
nuch, you cant get the taste out of your mouth?


pam wrote:
you ****ing clueless douchebag.


pam wrote:
You suck and lancer swallows.


pam wrote:
**** you you asshole I hope your christmas tree drys
out and burns down your trailer.


pam wrote:
Sorry asspunk, this doesnt get brought to a vote



pam wrote:
exactly i dont you stupid ****


pam wrote:
sorry dick with ears


pam wrote:
you sure do care you are menstrating over it.


pam wrote:
I hope you overdose on New years Randy, on
oxycotnin.


pam wrote:
yeah your wife keeps me busy too. she guzzles my nuts.


pam wrote:
guess again ass****


pam wrote:
And what I once said, "Randy you are an asshole"


pam wrote:
LOL, you ****ing sissy...



pam wrote:
i am not a sock puppet but you are


pam wrote:
smooth cold nyc get off of my tip


pam wrote:
Hey Jim, Put your finger up your ass and spin around.



pam wrote:
Geo, I can accept that. But, you are one as well.


pam wrote:
steveo taslks ****
without ever backing it up oh yes


pam wrote:
rec.radio.cb assholes are out in full force


pam wrote:
Negro please


pam wrote:
Why not show some real balls besides steves on your neck


pam wrote:
I know you wont to pussy to do so.


pam wrote:
Yeah you used to *beat* your meat


pam wrote:
i didnt post to this threads until now, ass****


pam wrote:
"WA3MOJ takes corncob up ass" i didnt post to this
threads until now, ass****


pam wrote:
you ****ed up asshole. Blow me, again


pam wrote:
iLL BET TOO MANY TO COUNT HE GETS INTOXICATED ON CUM.


pam wrote:
you jackoff steveo while staring AT PICS OF MEN.


pam wrote:
your a ****ing jew aren't you?


pam wrote:
thats not george you clueless ass****


pam wrote:
You Gay ****ing jerkoff you were with a Transexual this weekend.


pam wrote:
read what the **** I tpye


pam wrote:
are you ****ing drunk you stupid ass****


pam wrote:
I said that from the ****ing start you drunken asshole.


pam wrote:
go sniff some more toilets seat your delerious


pam wrote:
if you cant see this quit masterbATING YOUR
EYESITE WILL COMEBACK


pam wrote:
This is not grammar class you ****ing dick with ears


pam wrote:
did yur mother have anything that lived?


pam wrote:
Frank you really are suckinfg twistys dick hard these days


pam wrote:
are you befriendung him for other
reasons we dont know about yet, either way your make me sick


pam wrote:
Frank Twistedhed Gilliand advocates law breaking when he wrote:
"If you have a scanner, spend a few days listening in on some of your
neighbors' telephone conversations. You might be suprised."


pam wrote:
Again you have to reply and are a drugged up clueless assclown,as usual.


pam wrote:
I am speaking of the state in general now go **** yourself
dave McCampbell


pam wrote:
go tell your lies to another assclown like your wife
now she is a real **** from what i hear.


pam wrote:
wa3moj doesnt even post to this NG you dick sucking faggot.


pam wrote:
No one is on your leg dickhead, now go suck some more dick


pam wrote:
hahaha you are truely clueless you ass loving faggot. That is a 100% lie


pam wrote:
his wife is out getting banged while he sits at homne on the usenet


pam wrote:
No that i ****ed your ex- old lady was better.

  #85   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 03:48 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:22:08 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Well, you are just ONE BIG argument for more control.


No, I'm for reasonable control for the greater public good. At least
until people (and your examples aren't helping me to believe it) can
demonstrate that they can handle the responsibility alone. So far, in
every example, less regulation leads to chaos.

The least gov't is the best gov't,


To an extent, I agree. But a total absence of rules and laws is an
extreme that I cannot support.


400 million people need the radio spectrum more than a
handful of hams and the public servants we have hired to the people
business.


Why do 400 million people "need" radio spectrum? What spectrum "needs"
are not currently being addressed?

Ham radio is not an exclusive club. ANY one of those "400 million" are
welcome to join, provided they agree to follow the rules.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj




  #86   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 04:03 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You get the question backwards...
Why do these public servants need most of "MY" radio spectrum, I am against
giving the garbage collector more than a couple of chans too...
Hams don't need special treatment, they can share with the rest of the
people... giving them those bits of paper with "Licence" written on it just
confuses 'em and makes 'em feel "special", if they were all that special, we
would spend more and put 'em in "special education classes."
We don't need to design people to fit radios, we need to design radios to
fit people--it is easy to see how that got backwards--back when everyone was
afraid of electricity and radio had a "mysterious" quality I can see how a
bunch of under-educated people set this up--but today things are much
different... We need to shake the hams and FCC out of the rut which has
been established...

I am telling you, "Write, email, fax or otherwise contact your congressman
today!!!"

Regards,
John


  #87   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 04:36 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:25:36 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:


I think you should stay away from those magic
mushrooms.....


Dave


"Sandbagger"


http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

You can deny it to your little black heart's content, but the fact
remains many cbers get licenses (especialy the no-codes) only to return
to the cb and freeband.


I won't try to argue that point as I agree that some people
conceivably do "return" (or never left in the first place) to the CB
and freeband. I'm still somewhat active on both to this day.


Some of those who obtained licenses can never go
back because their voices are too easily recognized and their hammie
"friends" will report their ass for freebanding.


I'm not so sure that this is as prevalent as you claim.


They end up being
****ed off (then issed upon) hammies.


You discount the possibility that while exposed to ham radio, that
many people find respect for the rules, and have a change of attitude.


The anger toward such freebanders can be seen in your own posts.


Despite your many claims, I harbor no "anger". Stating facts that
doesn't sit well with you, is not the same thing as "anger".

Several
years ago you were making posts chastising hammies as being too uptight
and uppity and technical who look down on cbers.


Because in many cases, it's true. There are hams who are stuffy and
uptight. But they are legal. The converse is also true. Many outlaw
CB'ers feel that they have a right to do just what (and where) they
please without due regard for the rights of anyone else. RFI, direct
interference, and public nuisance issues do not seem to affect them.

Either behavior is reprehensible, and I've defended each respective
group when on the receiving end of such stereotypical prejudice.
Lately it's the hams who are unfairly on the receiving end of this
prejudice.


During your admitted
freebanding and illegal operating years, not once will you find a post
by yourself calling others names or expressing nosey concern for other
people's business that does not affect you.


I still don't. I'm not the one trying desperately to find out personal
information (often incorrectly like the name of my wife) about other
people.

Also worthy of note is the time you spend reviewing my 10 year span of
messages to this newsgroup. One might consider that as bordering on
obsession.

However, after having your
clock cleaned in reec.radio.cb by cbers for your oft extended hypocrisy,


reec (reek?) a freudian slip?

You are not qualified to make that determination. Your ability to be
objective is compromised by your subjective bias.


you began to take on a different persona. That you attribute such
behavior (name calling, attacking those who merely dx or freeband) to
"growing up", illustrates the fact you were an incredible late bloomer
and extremely slow learner who hasn't fully matured yet, as your
behavior continued well in to your thirties.


Well, then if I'm still "growing up", then you have yet to start
because you are still engaged in that illegal behavior.

If you consider bringing reality into focus in the same manner as a
simple unfounded ad-hominem attack, then I can see your issue. But
they're not the same.


In fact, you still are
illegal and have no right to say anything to anyone,


I assume you have some proof of this? Yea I know, you have tons of
proof, but you're not about to post it.


as for starters, the address you provided the FCC is not your primary residence and the
fact that you fail to correct this matter with the FCC even after being
informed you are illegal, leaves you no credibility with anything you
may say regarding other's actions.


You really, REALLY need to go back to whatever source of information
gathering you use and either fire them, demand your money back, or
something. Because, quite frankly, you are embarrassing yourself every
time you make these erroneous claims. My listed address in the FCC
database is exactly my primary (only) residence. I am doing nothing
illegal.

So the real question is, Who do you think I really am (today)? What do
you think is my "real" address?

The only thing I can figure is that the commonality of my name (Next
after Smith and Jones), has you so confused, that you believe I'm
someone different than who I actually am (There are 3 Dave Hall's in
my company's phone directory, talk about confusion). The fact that my
phone number is unlisted removes me from many people searches. That
also explains why you keep insisting that my wife's name is "Kimberly
T. Hall", and that she's a "teacher". In conclusion, you continue to
trust unreliable sources which provide you erroneous information and
then accuse others of things which are incorrect. It is not my
credibility that is in question here, it's yours.

But wait? Wasn't it you who just accused ME of trying to obtain
people's personal information? And you call me hypocritical.
Sheesh.......



Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj





  #88   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 06:24 PM
Freebandersblowgoats
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 27 Apr 2005 11:50:19 -0700, "CB outlaw"
wrote:

If you don't get the point, then your dumber than a rock!!!!


anyone that makes a response to post and doesn't quote the original
post so that we know what the hell you are talking about is dumber
than a ****ing ice cube!!!!
  #90   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 07:50 PM
CB outlaw
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you don't get the point, then your dumber than a rock!!!!

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419 ­ October 22, 2004 Radionews CB 2 October 23rd 04 03:53 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419 ­ October 22, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 October 22nd 04 08:00 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419 ­ October 22, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 October 22nd 04 08:00 PM
OLD motorola trunking information jack smith Scanner 1 December 12th 03 10:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017