Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then it was
another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been 'em... I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we can be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the truth--let the chips fall where they might... I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Regards, John "Steveo" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote: If you look at ham radio it is just un-progressive. If you can't see that--get new glasses! Newbie clue: don't be ripping hams here. Move on. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"John Smith" wrote:
I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Then please don't top post so much. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Oh yeah! I'll get right on that!
John "Steveo" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote: I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Then please don't top post so much. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"John Smith" wrote:
Oh yeah! I'll get right on that! John "Steveo" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote: I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Then please don't top post so much. Top poster/sig file test. -- Well it ain't the first close call I ever had as I'm sure you already know. I had some help from you Lord and the devil himself, but it's been strictly touch and go. Steve Earle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Stop posting! I am tired of responding!
John "Steveo" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote: Oh yeah! I'll get right on that! John "Steveo" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote: I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Then please don't top post so much. Top poster/sig file test. -- Well it ain't the first close call I ever had as I'm sure you already know. I had some help from you Lord and the devil himself, but it's been strictly touch and go. Steve Earle |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:10:03 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote: Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then it was another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been 'em... I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we can be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the truth--let the chips fall where they might... I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Regards, John John; So what was the intent of your original post? The truth is most hams don't care about "freeband" I also brought lunch, plus a 12 pack... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If that is true, they CERTAINLY would not care about CB--they do!!!
Get real or chat with others who have no respect for reality... John "Lancer" wrote in message ... On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:10:03 -0700, "John Smith" wrote: Newbie, nah, if I haven't been around the block with this bunch, then it was another one which looked so much alike--might as well have been 'em... I claim what I am saying is truth--if it isn't then tell me how so, we can be debate, we can argue--in the end, all which matters is the truth--let the chips fall where they might... I came and I ain't in a hurry, I brought a lunch... Regards, John John; So what was the intent of your original post? The truth is most hams don't care about "freeband" I also brought lunch, plus a 12 pack... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:51:28 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote: If that is true, they CERTAINLY would not care about CB--they do!!! Get real or chat with others who have no respect for reality... John Your own experience would prove otherwise. You asked a lot of questions about your freeband antenna in the amateur.antenna group. No one put you down or batted an eye over it. You could have ask the same questions about a "cb" antennas in that group and received the answers that you were looking for. Get Real? Whatever John, your just looking for an arguement... Have a nice day.. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hmmm, actually, that "freeband antenna" is operating on under my ham license
on 10 meters... The bandwidth of that ant is too narrow for freeband work... I use a beacon on Mt. Diablo in the San Joaquin Valley as a signal source for ant testing... it operates 24/7 on Channel 14 on CB... sends the call "AOH" @ 7 WPM repetitively... You need to follow the conversations closer... perhaps you do need me to bottom post... Regards, John "Lancer" wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:51:28 -0700, "John Smith" wrote: If that is true, they CERTAINLY would not care about CB--they do!!! Get real or chat with others who have no respect for reality... John Your own experience would prove otherwise. You asked a lot of questions about your freeband antenna in the amateur.antenna group. No one put you down or batted an eye over it. You could have ask the same questions about a "cb" antennas in that group and received the answers that you were looking for. Get Real? Whatever John, your just looking for an arguement... Have a nice day.. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:42:36 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote: Hmmm, actually, that "freeband antenna" is operating on under my ham license on 10 meters... The bandwidth of that ant is too narrow for freeband work... I use a beacon on Mt. Diablo in the San Joaquin Valley as a signal source for ant testing... it operates 24/7 on Channel 14 on CB... sends the call "AOH" @ 7 WPM repetitively... You need to follow the conversations closer... perhaps you do need me to bottom post... Regards, John Your antenna is licensed? I plotted your antenna, it easily has a 1 meg bandwidth. Try bottom posting, you stand a better chance of understanding your own posts.. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|