From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:44:42 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in
:

Oh great, another anarchist.

Ha,,,,this room is getting crowded.

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:07:06 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Frank*Gilliland)
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:44:42 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in
:

Oh great, another anarchist.

Ha,,,,this room is getting crowded.

And you thought that I was the only one who used that term.....

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:07:06 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:44:42 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote in
:
(Oh great, another anarchist.)

Ha,,,,this room is getting crowded.

And you thought that I was the only one who

used that term.....

Dave

"Sandbagger"

No,,what I said was to google the term "anarchy" in this group and the
results will illustrate that only you and malicious sock puppets use the
term on a regular basis. It was at this point I invoked a term you often
use and prefer to claim,,that "statistical probablility" is accepted
proof by your standards, and when this accepted proof you invoke is
applied to the posts, you are one guilty sucka for screwing with a vast
majority of posters.