Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 03:22 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, you are just ONE BIG argument for more control. The least gov't is
the best gov't, 400 million people need the radio spectrum more than a
handful of hams and the public servants we have hired to the people
business.

Write your congressman today! He will do nothing unless he knows there is a
problem!

Regards,
John


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 03:48 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:22:08 -0700, "John Smith"
wrote:

Well, you are just ONE BIG argument for more control.


No, I'm for reasonable control for the greater public good. At least
until people (and your examples aren't helping me to believe it) can
demonstrate that they can handle the responsibility alone. So far, in
every example, less regulation leads to chaos.

The least gov't is the best gov't,


To an extent, I agree. But a total absence of rules and laws is an
extreme that I cannot support.


400 million people need the radio spectrum more than a
handful of hams and the public servants we have hired to the people
business.


Why do 400 million people "need" radio spectrum? What spectrum "needs"
are not currently being addressed?

Ham radio is not an exclusive club. ANY one of those "400 million" are
welcome to join, provided they agree to follow the rules.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj


  #3   Report Post  
Old April 27th 05, 04:03 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You get the question backwards...
Why do these public servants need most of "MY" radio spectrum, I am against
giving the garbage collector more than a couple of chans too...
Hams don't need special treatment, they can share with the rest of the
people... giving them those bits of paper with "Licence" written on it just
confuses 'em and makes 'em feel "special", if they were all that special, we
would spend more and put 'em in "special education classes."
We don't need to design people to fit radios, we need to design radios to
fit people--it is easy to see how that got backwards--back when everyone was
afraid of electricity and radio had a "mysterious" quality I can see how a
bunch of under-educated people set this up--but today things are much
different... We need to shake the hams and FCC out of the rut which has
been established...

I am telling you, "Write, email, fax or otherwise contact your congressman
today!!!"

Regards,
John


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419 ­ October 22, 2004 Radionews CB 2 October 23rd 04 03:53 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419 ­ October 22, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 October 22nd 04 08:00 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1419 ­ October 22, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 October 22nd 04 08:00 PM
OLD motorola trunking information jack smith Scanner 1 December 12th 03 09:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017