Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Hall" wrote in message news Except when the law doesn't agree with your point of view or actions. You claim ignorance of the law is no excuse, but you arrogantly claim you break the law intentionally (holding up traffic in the passing lane, paralelling the car in the right lane) in order to enforce another law. Pa law states the left lane is for passing only. You're an uninformed (regarding the law in your own state) hypocrite. It is not illegal to run in the left lane as long as you are either passing or maintaining the posted speed limit. Do you honestly expect everyone to run in the right lane once they've hit the posted limit? That's ludicrous. Especially considering the volume of traffic in this area. I can't answer for PA, but in California you would get a ticket for impeding the flow of traffic. I've seen it, so please don't say it doesn't happen. So, the alternative is to allow people to exceed the posted limit? That seem somewhat contradictory to me. So basically, the way the law is written, it pretty much forces people to break the speed limit in order to "justify" using the left lane? Nope, it's called impeding the flow of traffic. If the basic traffic flow is going 65 to 70mph and you get three cars all going 65mph. The back up behind is more of a hazard than the people breaking the basic speed law. (Big snip) Dave "Sandbagger" Landshark -- Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder? Thunder and lightning couldn't be bolder. I'll write on your tombstone, ``I thank you for dinner.'' This game that we animals play is a winner. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|