LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22   Report Post  
Old July 25th 05, 04:13 AM
Vinnie S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:25:13 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"
wrote:


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 04:49:31 -0400, "Leland C. Scott"


wrote:


"Vinnie S." wrote in message
.. .
BTW, I got my ticket to General. Do you know how many times I have used
code?
ZERO. I have already forgotten the alphabet.

You know that was one of the points the FCC mentioned in it's NPRM, the
frequency that Hams learn the code and then never use it, as one point in
their decision to drop Morse testing completely.



I still hear it on 10 meters. They should test for it if you want CW

privilages.

There is no need to have any test for CW. The use of it will stand or fall
on it's own merits without any artificial boost due to testing requirements.
CW will never die out completely, like classic cars, somebody will always
have an interest in it.


I guess that is true.

Vinnie S.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement David Stinson Boatanchors 41 August 29th 03 02:33 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate N2EY Policy 1 July 31st 03 10:33 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017