| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
August 12th 05, 11:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Gilliland wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:21:21 -0400, (I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in : I can think of many who have ideas on this, but only a few here could pass the security clearance and have the ("desired" even if the ad doesn't say it) military background and extensive expertise in a related field. How about it, Frank? JimH? Feds need folks who are in touch with reality when it comes to anything to do with spectum and frequency management. Perhaps that would disqualify you both. Hmmm..... why would a spectrum allocation advisor need a security clearance? the intent is of course to disqualify anyone that hasn't spend year climbing the ladder in the case of a clearance they would justify it by claiming it was needed in order that someone could be told enough about our current milcoms to advise on it ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Phase frequency Detector | Homebrew | |||
| BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO | Policy | |||
| Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
| North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/2/2003 | Scanner | |||
Threaded Mode
