Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:25:57 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: +Hmmm..... why would a spectrum allocation advisor need a security +clearance? ******* Considering that the majority of the frequency spectrum from 200 to 400 Mhz is DOD primary control might be a reason. Someone would need more than casual knowledgable of some of the military communications specs. That in itself requires a minimal security clearance. Several other reasons I can think of. Not uncommon if one has to deal with military spectrum usage. james |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
Phase frequency Detector | Homebrew | |||
BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO | Policy | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/2/2003 | Scanner |