| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:25:57 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: +Hmmm..... why would a spectrum allocation advisor need a security +clearance? ******* Considering that the majority of the frequency spectrum from 200 to 400 Mhz is DOD primary control might be a reason. Someone would need more than casual knowledgable of some of the military communications specs. That in itself requires a minimal security clearance. Several other reasons I can think of. Not uncommon if one has to deal with military spectrum usage. james |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Phase frequency Detector | Homebrew | |||
| BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO | Policy | |||
| Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
| North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/2/2003 | Scanner | |||