| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:02:26 -0700, Frank Gilliland
wrote: +Actually that is one of the lower security clearances and is not that +difficult to get and maintain. IF you have no criminal background, no +membership in subversive organizations and not in severe debt, then +this clearance is easy to get. + + +Unless the system has changed in the past 20 years, there are three +levels of security clearance: 'confidential', 'secret' and 'top +secret'. It is -not- "one of the lower security clearances", and it is +-not- easy to get. ****** Well My brother holds a secret clearance and his job grade was down graded from top secret. I thought he mentioned that was the lowest clearance and he was glad to be there and not at top secret. But then I maybe wrong and Frank you maybe right. Besides I never could see the reason for top secret to track satellite launches either, but there at one time must have been. He would never tell the reason and I never pushed the issue out of respect for the clearance and his job. Why security clearances are issued and required is not always very obcious. I think in part it is what budget the department has and what the DoD determines is necessary for the job grade. james james |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
| Phase frequency Detector | Homebrew | |||
| BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO | Policy | |||
| Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew | |||
| North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/2/2003 | Scanner | |||