Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the
set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:21:43 -0500, Buther Boy wrote
in : What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB Neither antenna will work worth a damn regardless of SWR. Here's a suggestion: Scrounge some TV twinlead, use it to make a folded dipole, hang it on your wall, and connect it to your radio with a 4:1 balun that you can wind really easily using a core from a junk computer power supply. It will take you a whole hour to get it put together and cost you practically nothing. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:21:43 -0500, Buther Boy wrote:
What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB Neither. You won't get around the block with either of those antennas. Stick with the dipole. You will do fine with the dipole. Vinnie S. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:44:50 -0400, Vinnie S.
wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:21:43 -0500, Buther Boy wrote: What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB Neither. You won't get around the block with either of those antennas. Stick with the dipole. You will do fine with the dipole. Vinnie S. Vinnie S.: Thanks, I appreciate your feedback! Buther Boy -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:44:50 -0400, Vinnie S.
wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:21:43 -0500, Buther Boy wrote: What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB Neither. You won't get around the block with either of those antennas. Stick with the dipole. You will do fine with the dipole. Vinnie S. Due to restrictions of living in a condo, I had to settle on a somewhat "compromised" antenna, which I purchased a few days ago. I went ahead and ordered the miracle whip antenna, which while it is a compromise on 11 meter, provides me with the ability to "fairly" accurately pull in short wave broadcasts among other things. I don't know if anyone here on the board would ever use an antenna like the miracle whip, but it certainly will do the trick for my application, albeit a bit of a compromise on 11 meter. Buther Boy -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:58:39 -0500, Buther Boy wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:44:50 -0400, Vinnie S. wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:21:43 -0500, Buther Boy wrote: What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB Neither. You won't get around the block with either of those antennas. Stick with the dipole. You will do fine with the dipole. Vinnie S. Due to restrictions of living in a condo, I had to settle on a somewhat "compromised" antenna, which I purchased a few days ago. I went ahead and ordered the miracle whip antenna, which while it is a compromise on 11 meter, provides me with the ability to "fairly" accurately pull in short wave broadcasts among other things. I don't know if anyone here on the board would ever use an antenna like the miracle whip, but it certainly will do the trick for my application, albeit a bit of a compromise on 11 meter. Buther Boy Not familiar qith that. The receive is not as critical on an antenna, as transmitting on it. If you want to talk skip or DX, the dipole is the way to go. And if you are in a urban area, you can get locals too. I don't think that whip will be any good, if you are going to transmit on it. Vinnie S. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you think would work better in this situation, a back of the
set Radio Shack antenna or a tunable tip rubber duck antenna? With both antennas, I wonder about SWR. Will be testing both in a week or so.... BB -- Remove the word Spam from my e-mail to contact me... http://www.PrivacySig.com/SIGbutherb...mail-black.png ~ What is a "buther boy"? Is that like a butcher boy? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave | |||
Newbie SWL question: Antenna geometry | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
Question for better antenna mavens than I | Shortwave |