About Us

November 18th 05, 04:28 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb

wrote:

Just the same, "clothing allowance" or not, Dudly the Imposter
has NOT posted ANY picture of hisself in ANY "active-duty"
USMC uniform.

Who is Dudly?

Was anyone required to?

We have yet to see YOU in a uniform, yet you have "signed" hundreds
of posts with your former service number.

Dudly has NOT posted a single scrap of his DD-214 anywhere.

Who's Dudly?

And we've not seen a single scrap of YOUR DD-214 anywhere either.

Dudly has NOT posted a single name or
callsign of anyone who could vouch that he is telling truth.

Who's Dudly?

As for me, I've posted numersou callsigns that can be verified by
the agencies that assigned them.

Dudly the Imposter is still busy being the Imposter.

The only "imposter" I see here is the one who claims to know so
much about Amateur Radio but has never spent one second as a licensed
Amateur Radio operator.

Hans is defending a FRAUD. Good on Hans. Just what the
"amateur community" needs. Pro-bono "defense."

He did? What fraud?

I wonder if Booth, Freret, Imlay, and Tepper know about this?

I wonder what the IEEE would say about you using your IEEE domain
e mail address to publish hateful and deceitful tripe.

Well, let's look optimistically. Mebbe Dudly will have a
cute little Ham Jumpsuit photo sometime? Mebbe with a "I
was homeland security before there was homeland security"
ribbon on it? Mighty warrior, etc. Then he can claim "8
hostile actions" after having made it through the Code War.

Who's Dudly?

And why are you misquoting me?

These mighty warriors certainly know how to turn off any
ham wannabes...which may be why Val Germann is still an
unmodified Tech for so long?

At least he IS a Tech.

Please remind us what class of Amateur license YOU hold?

Steve, K4YZ

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Menu

About Us