"James F. Mayer" wrote in message
nk.net...

No, he is NOT.

"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the

form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and

ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the

time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so

branding it... No one is bound to obey an uncontitutional law, and no

courts are bound to enforce it."

-- 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256


That would be correct if this littering law was found unconstitutional.

Landshark


--
That's funny. You managed to actually make the thug alter his outside
real world actions because of his incompetence in this ng. The internet
magnifies peoples' idiocy, as he shows.