Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 03, 05:54 AM
Bill Frovik n0mnb
 
Posts: n/a
Default

go for it. as long as u share your info and results with the ham
community..and it wouldn't hurt to get ur ticket..
73's de n0mnb
"Leo Szumel" wrote in message
...
Hi,

What we'd like to do is use amateur radio for some university research
projects. Specifically, we would like to use AR equipment in sensor
network research. Sensor networks are basically like APRS without people
at the transmit nodes, and more than just position information is
reported (maybe temperature, etc). Also, multi-hop relay may be employed.

I've examined Part 97 rules and tried to read as many applicable threads
as possible. My interpretation is that:

(a) automated transmissions are OK (with caveats)
(b) AR can be used for educational (non-commercial) purposes
(c) AR can be used for data transmissions, using encrypted
authentication, provided the data payload is unencrypted

Part (b) is the most shaky becaues it seems to dependon "reasonable use"
and other gray terms. Certainly my proposed use is not "hobby" but it
seems to me to fall into the category of "experimentation" and
(hopefully) "advancing the field."

What do you think of using AR bands for relaying sensor information for
research purposes? Would an FCC Special Temporary Authority be
appropriate/required?

Sincerely,

--
Leo Szumel | ECE Graduate Student, UC Davis
Email:



  #42   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 03, 03:02 PM
WB3FUP \(Mike Hall\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that you have to have a properly
licensed control operator, at a control point, for
any transmission made on amateur radio except in
the case of emergency. Emergency is further
defined as threat to life and property.

I have, on various boy scout camporees, place a
two meter, rock controlled radio, set on 52, in
the disaster sight. The boys were on there own,
but there was always someone with a stronger
radio, close at hand, to monitor, w/o the boys
realizing it. Never had a problem, and did some
sole searching about definition of control point.
Decided that the stretch, if any was worth it, and
I was willing to defend my decision if necessary.

--
73 es cul

wb3fup
a Salty Bear

"Bill Frovik n0mnb" wrote in
message ...
go for it. as long as u share your info and

results with the ham
community..and it wouldn't hurt to get ur

ticket..
73's de n0mnb
"Leo Szumel"

wrote in message
...
Hi,

What we'd like to do is use amateur radio for

some university research
projects. Specifically, we would like to use

AR equipment in sensor
network research. Sensor networks are

basically like APRS without people
at the transmit nodes, and more than just

position information is
reported (maybe temperature, etc). Also,

multi-hop relay may be employed.

I've examined Part 97 rules and tried to read

as many applicable threads
as possible. My interpretation is that:

(a) automated transmissions are OK (with

caveats)
(b) AR can be used for educational

(non-commercial) purposes
(c) AR can be used for data transmissions,

using encrypted
authentication, provided the data payload is

unencrypted

Part (b) is the most shaky becaues it seems to

dependon "reasonable use"
and other gray terms. Certainly my proposed

use is not "hobby" but it
seems to me to fall into the category of

"experimentation" and
(hopefully) "advancing the field."

What do you think of using AR bands for

relaying sensor information for
research purposes? Would an FCC Special

Temporary Authority be
appropriate/required?

Sincerely,

--
Leo Szumel | ECE Graduate Student, UC Davis
Email:





  #43   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 03, 03:02 PM
WB3FUP \(Mike Hall\)
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that you have to have a properly
licensed control operator, at a control point, for
any transmission made on amateur radio except in
the case of emergency. Emergency is further
defined as threat to life and property.

I have, on various boy scout camporees, place a
two meter, rock controlled radio, set on 52, in
the disaster sight. The boys were on there own,
but there was always someone with a stronger
radio, close at hand, to monitor, w/o the boys
realizing it. Never had a problem, and did some
sole searching about definition of control point.
Decided that the stretch, if any was worth it, and
I was willing to defend my decision if necessary.

--
73 es cul

wb3fup
a Salty Bear

"Bill Frovik n0mnb" wrote in
message ...
go for it. as long as u share your info and

results with the ham
community..and it wouldn't hurt to get ur

ticket..
73's de n0mnb
"Leo Szumel"

wrote in message
...
Hi,

What we'd like to do is use amateur radio for

some university research
projects. Specifically, we would like to use

AR equipment in sensor
network research. Sensor networks are

basically like APRS without people
at the transmit nodes, and more than just

position information is
reported (maybe temperature, etc). Also,

multi-hop relay may be employed.

I've examined Part 97 rules and tried to read

as many applicable threads
as possible. My interpretation is that:

(a) automated transmissions are OK (with

caveats)
(b) AR can be used for educational

(non-commercial) purposes
(c) AR can be used for data transmissions,

using encrypted
authentication, provided the data payload is

unencrypted

Part (b) is the most shaky becaues it seems to

dependon "reasonable use"
and other gray terms. Certainly my proposed

use is not "hobby" but it
seems to me to fall into the category of

"experimentation" and
(hopefully) "advancing the field."

What do you think of using AR bands for

relaying sensor information for
research purposes? Would an FCC Special

Temporary Authority be
appropriate/required?

Sincerely,

--
Leo Szumel | ECE Graduate Student, UC Davis
Email:





  #44   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 03, 04:06 PM
Phil Kane
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:54:02 -0500, Bill Frovik n0mnb wrote:

go for it. as long as u share your info and results with the ham
community..and it wouldn't hurt to get ur ticket..
73's de n0mnb


Leo and I kicked this around in private e-mail, and because of lots
of facts that you don't know, the use of amateur radio for this
project is NOT proper.

Gotta' know the whole story before you dispense quasi-legal
advice.....especially when said advice is incorrect.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
Principal Attorney
Communications Law Center
San Francisco, CA


  #45   Report Post  
Old August 3rd 03, 04:06 PM
Phil Kane
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 23:54:02 -0500, Bill Frovik n0mnb wrote:

go for it. as long as u share your info and results with the ham
community..and it wouldn't hurt to get ur ticket..
73's de n0mnb


Leo and I kicked this around in private e-mail, and because of lots
of facts that you don't know, the use of amateur radio for this
project is NOT proper.

Gotta' know the whole story before you dispense quasi-legal
advice.....especially when said advice is incorrect.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
Principal Attorney
Communications Law Center
San Francisco, CA


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
eBay Yaesu FR-101 - Dead bands - need help Brian & Deb Wingert Boatanchors 6 August 30th 14 01:39 AM
Please send me your opinion about my project as placed on inforelation55 Antenna 0 November 9th 04 03:24 PM
Help with ARRL 1960 Handbook project Ron Boatanchors 0 July 8th 04 01:56 PM
Portable QRP project for blind ham living in apartment. Darrell Shandrow Antenna 1 March 29th 04 03:32 PM
Anyone have mid 1960s Spiegel catalogs? (radio history research project) K5DH Boatanchors 0 November 7th 03 01:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017