Hello!!
I am looking for "Graphics Packet for Linux" application.
I have link ftp://147.229.35.11/pub/hamradio/Xpr/ but
unfortunately it is invalid. I will be greateful for
information where can I find this application.



Regards
--
SP9RQA

Okay, so I went to:

http://radio.linux.org.au/

and looked-up XPR:

ftp://ftp.qsl.net/pub/ok2pid/xpr-0.42.tgz

Do I win a cookie?

Okay, so I went to:

http://radio.linux.org.au/

and looked-up XPR:

ftp://ftp.qsl.net/pub/ok2pid/xpr-0.42.tgz

Do I win a cookie?

Why do they all rely upon the kernels AX.25 ?
Kiss mode is limited to packet radio (at least with
the TNC's that I've got) and why would I want to run
packet radio on hf ? Pactor is better for hf and that
means I can't use any of all those "terminals" that
really rely upon the kernels ax.25 to do all the work.
Why pay lots of money for a competent controller and
then make it really stupid by using kiss ?

73 de Per / SM0RWO

Uwe Krause wrote:
Krzysztof Piecuch wrote :


Hello!!
I am looking for "Graphics Packet for Linux" application.


Hi,

what about LinKT ?`

http://1409.linkt.de/projects/linkt/

Have fun,

73 Uwe
dl6mpg

---
"The hard part was figuring out how to destroy the
physical universe. But I think we've solved that."
- Marcus Larry, 1999

Why do they all rely upon the kernels AX.25 ?
Kiss mode is limited to packet radio (at least with
the TNC's that I've got) and why would I want to run
packet radio on hf ? Pactor is better for hf and that
means I can't use any of all those "terminals" that
really rely upon the kernels ax.25 to do all the work.
Why pay lots of money for a competent controller and
then make it really stupid by using kiss ?

73 de Per / SM0RWO

Uwe Krause wrote:
Krzysztof Piecuch wrote :


Hello!!
I am looking for "Graphics Packet for Linux" application.


Hi,

what about LinKT ?`

http://1409.linkt.de/projects/linkt/

Have fun,

73 Uwe
dl6mpg

---
"The hard part was figuring out how to destroy the
physical universe. But I think we've solved that."
- Marcus Larry, 1999

"Pär C" wrote in message
...
Why do they all rely upon the kernels AX.25 ?
Kiss mode is limited to packet radio (at least with
the TNC's that I've got) and why would I want to run
packet radio on hf ? Pactor is better for hf and that
means I can't use any of all those "terminals" that
really rely upon the kernels ax.25 to do all the work.
Why pay lots of money for a competent controller and
then make it really stupid by using kiss ?


A lot of the Linux stuff is like that. When you wander away from the
mainstream, this is to be expected. Part of the problem is that most
software for Linux is open source, written by junior programmer wannabees,
then re-hacked by other "programmers" who are no better.

.... So the third-weenie OS is loaded up with third-weenie software.... Is
that a big surprise?

If you really wanted performance, you'd be going with #1.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL

"Pär C" wrote in message
...
Why do they all rely upon the kernels AX.25 ?
Kiss mode is limited to packet radio (at least with
the TNC's that I've got) and why would I want to run
packet radio on hf ? Pactor is better for hf and that
means I can't use any of all those "terminals" that
really rely upon the kernels ax.25 to do all the work.
Why pay lots of money for a competent controller and
then make it really stupid by using kiss ?


A lot of the Linux stuff is like that. When you wander away from the
mainstream, this is to be expected. Part of the problem is that most
software for Linux is open source, written by junior programmer wannabees,
then re-hacked by other "programmers" who are no better.

.... So the third-weenie OS is loaded up with third-weenie software.... Is
that a big surprise?

If you really wanted performance, you'd be going with #1.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL

"charlesb" wrote

If you really wanted performance, you'd be going with #1.

Amiga?

"charlesb" wrote

If you really wanted performance, you'd be going with #1.

Amiga?

"Gene Storey" wrote in message
...
"charlesb" wrote

If you really wanted performance, you'd be going with #1.

Amiga?

TI 99/4A of course!

Charles Brabham, N5PVL