Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
needing input on 802 standard
Greetings
My name is Larry and my callsign is ve3fxq. I have a problem. Though I have been licenced since 1964, I feel like the perferbial newbie. I have been away from amateur radio from around the mid 90's until now. I got my hf and vhf equipment reconnected this summer and found radio activity far lower than when I left it in mid 90's. Now I am retired and need a shot in the arm with some insight with the new technology. I am now reading about a stardard called 802.... What is it. I am also hearing the people are using 2.5 ghz and 5.0 ghz I am not sure where to begin asking questions so... does anyone know of a website that can educate me on this new 802 standard and how that frequency is gotten to. I hate to say this but etc, etc. Larry ve3fxq |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Well, 802.11 is the standard used for WiFi, or wireless networking cards
you can purchase for your home computers. Many people have found that with amplifiers (even to the legal limit) covers quite a distance. Nothing to do with Ham radio though, except that WiFi is co-mingled partially with one of the U.S. ham bands at 2 GHz and 5 GHz. Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. "larry" wrote Greetings My name is Larry and my callsign is ve3fxq. I have a problem. Though I have been licenced since 1964, I feel like the perferbial newbie. I have been away from amateur radio from around the mid 90's until now. I got my hf and vhf equipment reconnected this summer and found radio activity far lower than when I left it in mid 90's. Now I am retired and need a shot in the arm with some insight with the new technology. I am now reading about a stardard called 802.... What is it. I am also hearing the people are using 2.5 ghz and 5.0 ghz I am not sure where to begin asking questions so... does anyone know of a website that can educate me on this new 802 standard and how that frequency is gotten to. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well, 802.11 is the standard used for WiFi, or wireless networking cards
you can purchase for your home computers. Many people have found that with amplifiers (even to the legal limit) covers quite a distance. Nothing to do with Ham radio though, except that WiFi is co-mingled partially with one of the U.S. ham bands at 2 GHz and 5 GHz. Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. "larry" wrote Greetings My name is Larry and my callsign is ve3fxq. I have a problem. Though I have been licenced since 1964, I feel like the perferbial newbie. I have been away from amateur radio from around the mid 90's until now. I got my hf and vhf equipment reconnected this summer and found radio activity far lower than when I left it in mid 90's. Now I am retired and need a shot in the arm with some insight with the new technology. I am now reading about a stardard called 802.... What is it. I am also hearing the people are using 2.5 ghz and 5.0 ghz I am not sure where to begin asking questions so... does anyone know of a website that can educate me on this new 802 standard and how that frequency is gotten to. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article 7t8zb.4012$US3.3773@okepread03,
Gene Storey wrote: (snip) Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. (snip) What attracts them away from using just the Internet and WiFi for communication, then, which you don't have to pass examinations for, if not the home-built electronics, etc.? Maybe other hams provide better conversation or something? (-: Or, they're traveling a lot and can't easily get connectivity any other way from where they are? -- Mark |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article 7t8zb.4012$US3.3773@okepread03,
Gene Storey wrote: (snip) Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. (snip) What attracts them away from using just the Internet and WiFi for communication, then, which you don't have to pass examinations for, if not the home-built electronics, etc.? Maybe other hams provide better conversation or something? (-: Or, they're traveling a lot and can't easily get connectivity any other way from where they are? -- Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Storey" wrote in message
news:7t8zb.4012$US3.3773@okepread03... Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. I wouldn't be quite that strong. Yes, a lot of hams are older, but we are adding new hams at a slightly higher rate than we are killing off old ones. And the new folks, while different, are engaged in the wide range of facets of this hobby that we all are. We do have a huge number of techs, who are pretty much relegated to VHF. A surprising number of these folks are getting engaged in Amateur Radio Public Service activities. Perhaps not as many as we might like are upgrading, but emergency communications is probably 90% or better VHF, so for what drives these folks, their tech license is all they need. We are also seeing a renaissance of sorts of building, both kit and homebrew. There are probably more kit manufacturers out there than ever, and the quality of these kits is astonishing. Most are far better than Heathkit ever dreamed of, and some even have construction manuals that put Heath to shame. Nowadays, even the smallest club can put together very high quality kits. Take a peek at what the North Georgia QRP Club is doing, or the Flying Pigs. For the top of the line commercial kit, take a look at http://www.elecraft.com. There are very few already built rigs that can hold a candle to the K2, and they are all a LOT more expensive. Homebrewing has been spurred by the Internet, which gets homebrewers together on forums like this one and QRP-L, and has made parts more accessible as well. Subscribe to QRP-L, or just graze the archives (http://qrp.lehigh.edu/lists/qrp-l/) and the number of homebrewers gathering there is astonishing. Wander on over to http://www.qrparci.org/links.html and follow some of the links to the various clubs ... most of which have some sort of kitting projects, or to the dozens commercial outfits offering kits and supplies. Take a look at http://www.amqrp.org for some pretty high tech kits and projects. AmQRP has a magazine, the Homebrewer, which is strictly about homebrewing, and Sprat, QQ, and several others are heavily homebrew. Amateur radio is changing, and maybe it's not always changing in the ways that make us comfortable, but it certainly isn't all doom and gloom. And for those of us that like to melt solder, we have a lot more company than we did 10 years ago. ... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Gene Storey" wrote in message
news:7t8zb.4012$US3.3773@okepread03... Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. I wouldn't be quite that strong. Yes, a lot of hams are older, but we are adding new hams at a slightly higher rate than we are killing off old ones. And the new folks, while different, are engaged in the wide range of facets of this hobby that we all are. We do have a huge number of techs, who are pretty much relegated to VHF. A surprising number of these folks are getting engaged in Amateur Radio Public Service activities. Perhaps not as many as we might like are upgrading, but emergency communications is probably 90% or better VHF, so for what drives these folks, their tech license is all they need. We are also seeing a renaissance of sorts of building, both kit and homebrew. There are probably more kit manufacturers out there than ever, and the quality of these kits is astonishing. Most are far better than Heathkit ever dreamed of, and some even have construction manuals that put Heath to shame. Nowadays, even the smallest club can put together very high quality kits. Take a peek at what the North Georgia QRP Club is doing, or the Flying Pigs. For the top of the line commercial kit, take a look at http://www.elecraft.com. There are very few already built rigs that can hold a candle to the K2, and they are all a LOT more expensive. Homebrewing has been spurred by the Internet, which gets homebrewers together on forums like this one and QRP-L, and has made parts more accessible as well. Subscribe to QRP-L, or just graze the archives (http://qrp.lehigh.edu/lists/qrp-l/) and the number of homebrewers gathering there is astonishing. Wander on over to http://www.qrparci.org/links.html and follow some of the links to the various clubs ... most of which have some sort of kitting projects, or to the dozens commercial outfits offering kits and supplies. Take a look at http://www.amqrp.org for some pretty high tech kits and projects. AmQRP has a magazine, the Homebrewer, which is strictly about homebrewing, and Sprat, QQ, and several others are heavily homebrew. Amateur radio is changing, and maybe it's not always changing in the ways that make us comfortable, but it certainly isn't all doom and gloom. And for those of us that like to melt solder, we have a lot more company than we did 10 years ago. ... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article 7t8zb.4012$US3.3773@okepread03, says...
Well, 802.11 is the standard used for WiFi, or wireless networking cards you can purchase for your home computers. Many people have found that with amplifiers (even to the legal limit) covers quite a distance. Nothing to do with Ham radio though, except that WiFi is co-mingled partially with one of the U.S. ham bands at 2 GHz and 5 GHz. More specifically: The current standards are 802.11b and 802.11g. In terms of security, wireless networking is iffy at best. WEP can be cracked in a matter of hours. Hams are dying now by the droves, and the modes and skills of operators is drastically changing. No longer are the skills of building a rig from scratch what drives new hams. They mostly want to communicate, and not be here just for the electronics. Excuse me?! Speak for yourself! I've always been in it for the fun and learning of messing with the guts of the radios and associated goodies themselves. In fact, I went and made RF services part of my side business, dedicated heavily to hams who want to use commercial hardware (mostly Motorola) on the ham bands, but who may lack the skill or equipment to get such working on them. I will say that there's a -lot- more "appliance operators" on the air, but the techies among us are still around. You just have to look a little longer and harder to find them. 73 de KC7GR -- Dr. Anton Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute (Known to some as Bruce Lane, KC7GR) kyrrin a/t bluefeathertech d-o=t c&o&m Motorola Radio Programming & Service Available - http://www.bluefeathertech.com/rf.html "Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (Red Green) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[OT] Rcvr antenna input impedance | Antenna | |||
WTB: Vibroplex Deluxe Standard Bug | Boatanchors | |||
Vibroplex Standard Bugs FS | Boatanchors | |||
Wiring Standard for 1/4" Mic Plugs? | Boatanchors | |||
FS: FTS 5060 Cesium Frequency and Time Standard | Boatanchors |