Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:06:48 -0800, Bill Turner
wrote: On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:17:53 GMT, 'Doc wrote: Since the backstay (or frontstay) is ~there~ anyway, why not use it? Certainly not the 'best' thing in the world (whatever that is), but 'better' than most alternative$. There are insulators designed just for backstays which one could place at the 16.4 foot level for 20 meters, or multiple locations for multiple bands. In a home situation, I wouldn't care much but on a small boat on the open sea, KISS could save your life, IMO. Some people have a 'phobia' about tuners. If you don't want to use one, that's fine. The word "phobia" means a fear of. I'm certainly not afraid of tuners, but I believe making the antenna right is better than using a device to compensate for one that isn't. "Bias" would be a better word. Once the antenna is resonant, a simple L-C network will transform the impedance to 50 ohms resistive and you are all set. Simple, cheap and reliable, all the things a tuner is not. They do make 'things' much easier and the difference in performance is 'acceptible' in most cases (acceptible being relative). Sigh. It's kind of difficult to get a resonant quarter wave into a back stay as you don't usually know where ground is. Ground can be any number of feet from where the feed point is on a boat. Every thing above real ground is antenna. 73 Gary K4FMX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TX Distance question | Antenna | |||
Stacking Distance Question. More Information | Antenna | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna |