Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many thanks for the replies to my post. I wanted a few other opinions and I
had hoped for some from DX stations also but that didn't happen. I believe that I will follow the 6 month elapsed time for a follow-up query. I am mainly concerned right now with 80 meter DX contacts. (very hard to get from the Midwest - every one is gold) and of course new countries. DXpeditions take longer and should be allowed longer time before a query. I just did some calculations and find that I get over 92% replies within 6 months. The other 8 percent are received within a year or never come. Bureau is an entirely different matter and I never use it if I really need something but I do respond to any bureau requests. Over the last 20 years I have lost a lot of confidence in QSL'ing through the bureau. I don't do E-QSL's yet but do use LOTW. I can see that by using the combination one could get the QSL from one and the credit through the other. Hopefully they will both continue to grow. I don't even want to know how much money I have given to the mail thieves over the years. I sure welcome the new methods of QSL'ing though. Again, tnx for your inputs, Trav, WX0Y |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Testimony on Hams' Katrina Response | Policy | |||
Resistor Frequency Response | Antenna | |||
Resistor frequency response | Boatanchors | |||
Improved AM Detector | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |