Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Caveat Lector wrote:
There is this to understand All of the below is old hat and has been going on for a long time -- 30 years that I know of. No worse now as compared to then. I would disagree with that assessment. There are a lot of things in ham radio that aren't worse than they were 30 years ago. But this isn't one of them. I got my license in 1973 and I clearly remember a day when if you would listen, you could almost always find the guy the DX was working. Yeah, there were plenty of people who didn't know that - who would just pick a transmit frequency at random & just call there - but they didn't call continuously *every time* the DX stopped transmitting. Indeed, while I hate to join the "I hate packet" bandwagon there really does seem to be a correlation between continuous calling and the explosive growth of spotting nets. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I don't understand | Shortwave | |||
I don't understand 'split' | General | |||
aerial coupling and nec2 - I do not understand my results | Antenna |