Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI said :
Any contester of value will welcome any CW op regardless of speed. I would hope slower CW ops would not be intimidated by my high CQ speed and would call anyway. (I realize that's probably not realistic) I will happily slow down to match the speed at which you call me. Generally these folks can recognize their call sign at any speed, and with a memory keyer -- pushing buttons (or keyboarding macros) is what they do to work CW DX or contesting. This is something I can relate to. Not being a CW lover, my DXCC was SSB-only, and until last year, that's all I really operated. That and a little RTTY and PSK-31. Well, once I realized that even though my primary DXCC was phone, my band awards could be mixed, I started to get curious. I still couldn't do more than about 8 or 9 WPM after not using code for about 20 years (and never being much good at it even then), so I took to using CW decoding software. It helped a little but I found it more useless than useful. Then I discovered CW contesting as a means to building up my 40 and 80m totals. Intimidating as hell at 35-40 WPM, but with packet spots, in S&P mode, I could see who I was working; I could audibly confirm their calls even if it took 3 or 4 tries (or 5 or 6 if they were really fast). I can pick my own call out of noise easily, I know what report I was being given back (even serial numbers if I listened carefully), and all of a sudden I was a lot more comfortable with code. N1MM generates my replies with good clean CW which helps, too! I now DX in CW just as happily as in phone (though my TS-570's AGC makes is painful at times), but I still can't hold a long QSO in that mode. I just bought a Vibroplex iambic and with luck, my QSO speed will start back to 17-20 WPM by year's end. In all of that, I never attempted to throw my call in even once if I wasn't sure what to expect back. As I listen to the zoo that is FT5XO on 40, I have to stop and wonder just what level some of these bozos are at. I'm betting there are some extra-heavies in there (along with extra-lites). Few seem to understand the concept of split, some fists are so bad it's agonizing to listen to and the litany of lids who continue to throw their calls ad-infinitum-ad-nauseum, even as the MicroLites are transmitting, is enough to drive me batty. I just have to wonder if CW decoding software is taking a lot of inDUHviduals from the SSB parts of the bands and making them pretend-CW ops, fouling it for those who actually know how to listen and have a clue on how to operate. 73 de Peter, W2IRT (ex-AB2NZ, VE3THX) Please reply to Double-you Two Eye Are Tee at Arrl.net |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I don't understand | Shortwave | |||
I don't understand 'split' | General | |||
aerial coupling and nec2 - I do not understand my results | Antenna |