Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter:
I really didn't notice any deficiency with the antenna directly fed by coax, without any sort of matching transformer. As such, it is definitely possible the coax became a vertical component of the antenna, and I've actually had one person suggest I had a coax vertical antenna with a huge top hat, but personally don't believe that for a minute. With the ladder line, some will tell you the vertical component of the ladder line becomes part of the antenna, and while this may be true in some respect, the voltages on the two conductors of the ladder line are opposite all of the time, so they should cancel out, resulting in no net effect for the vertical section of ladder line feeding the loop. Therefore, the loop pattern should be primarily dependent upon the number of wavelengths long each of the sides is, and the relative polarization at the band you are thinking of. Generally speaking, horizontal loops do pretty well as the frequency increases... and typically are not so fussy that they cannot be readily tuned with a decent antenna tuner. Before I put up the poles, I just used a slingshot and a weight to pull a light but strong twisted nylon line (about the same thickness as a "chalk line") over or through appropriate trees and used it to pull the insulated wire in place. The only pole was a wooden 2x6 that supported the feed corner. With the pole version, nylon ropes hold pulleys that can be raised from the ground, so I can run the loop around the inside of the poles, through the pulleys, then hoist the pulleys up to the top of the poles using the nylon ropes. This gives me the flexibility to lower the wire to change the length (up to the maximum allowed by the inside dimension described by the poles) or add a second conductor below or inside the first one to help broadband the antenna. Art Bell used two conductors about 4 or 5 feet apart vertically, with the lower one a bit shorter than the top one. This may have effectively created the same electrical effect as a 4 or 5 foot diameter element, thus creating a more broadband antenna than a typical loop already is. Once I get the big loop up, I'll be playing with different orientations of a second wire to see how they play... I'll take pictures and put them on one of my web sites once it's up... --Rick AH7H Walter wrote: Rick, I would love to see a photo of the setup when you get done. It sounds really cool. I have posted some sky-wire questions in a few other groups and some people have told me that I need to use a matching transformer, http://www2.hard-core-dx.com/nordicd...eed/feed1.html to balance the coax and the wire antenna. I'm pretty sure I'm going to run a sky-wire, but I may wait until this fall, after the leaves go. It seems easier without all of the leaves when using a slingshot. I tied mine up with trout line. I bought went I got the 1 oz. egg sinkers and figured it should be able to hold up under bad weather. about the setup, doesn't the ladder line become part of the antenna? thanks. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Parallel balun problem with wire loop | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna |