Does this mean you will not QSL cards via the buro?

Dick, aa5vu

Of course paper cards also, just trying this new LoTW for a grin!

Bob 9V1GO

196 from 6800 uploaded to LoTW.
Mostly DX, fairly small number of NA.

Suspect low hit count might have something to do with the
fact that some of the QSOs I uploaded date back to 1954 ...

Don't forget to also upload to eQSL :-)

--

... Hank

Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net
W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net

"Bob 9V1GO" wrote in message
...
I recently updated my LoTW for both 9V1GO and G4VGO. Only 240+ hits for
7,900 QSO's for G4VGO, and thirty or so hits for 9V1GO (2K Q's uploaded).
Is anyone using this service? It makes contest QSLing easy, and saves the
direct QSL hassle if you are in a place nobody operates the lower bands (who
QSLs at least).

Anyway, if you worked 9V1GO, your card is in the server.

73

Bob 9V1GO G4VGO

PS-Direct is OK also, turnaround is about three days when it gets here.

Hi Bob,

Yes, the service is "way cool'. G

73,
Jim - ku5s
--
email sent to:
is discarded without being seen.
Sorry for any inconvenience.

Hi,

I already see one drawback to this project. I am sure that thousands hams
working from small entities will never confirm your "most wanted" QSOs as
they are probably not connected to the Internet, but conversely, if you want
to valide the most usual contacts, american stations, and other English
spoken big DXCC (VK, G, etc) or big DX-peditions, this procedure should be
useful.

Thierry
ON4SKY
http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry


"Bob 9V1GO" wrote in message
...
I recently updated my LoTW for both 9V1GO and G4VGO. Only 240+ hits for
7,900 QSO's for G4VGO, and thirty or so hits for 9V1GO (2K Q's uploaded).
Is anyone using this service? It makes contest QSLing easy, and saves the
direct QSL hassle if you are in a place nobody operates the lower bands
(who
QSLs at least).

Anyway, if you worked 9V1GO, your card is in the server.

73

Bob 9V1GO G4VGO

PS-Direct is OK also, turnaround is about three days when it gets here.

I'm sure a lot more "QSL" managers will be found who will upload for unconnected DX,
rather than do cards. Even do a bunch of typing.... Any HF packet links still running
that these far away stations could use ?

Thierry wrote:
Hi,

I already see one drawback to this project. I am sure that thousands hams
working from small entities will never confirm your "most wanted" QSOs as
they are probably not connected to the Internet, but conversely, if you want
to valide the most usual contacts, american stations, and other English
spoken big DXCC (VK, G, etc) or big DX-peditions, this procedure should be
useful.

Thierry
ON4SKY
http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry


"Bob 9V1GO" wrote in message
...

I recently updated my LoTW for both 9V1GO and G4VGO. Only 240+ hits for
7,900 QSO's for G4VGO, and thirty or so hits for 9V1GO (2K Q's uploaded).
Is anyone using this service? It makes contest QSLing easy, and saves the
direct QSL hassle if you are in a place nobody operates the lower bands

(who

QSLs at least).

Anyway, if you worked 9V1GO, your card is in the server.

73

Bob 9V1GO G4VGO

PS-Direct is OK also, turnaround is about three days when it gets here.

I'm sure a lot more "QSL" managers will be found who will upload for unconnected DX,
rather than do cards. Even do a bunch of typing.... Any HF packet links still running
that these far away stations could use ?

Thierry wrote:
Hi,

I already see one drawback to this project. I am sure that thousands hams
working from small entities will never confirm your "most wanted" QSOs as
they are probably not connected to the Internet, but conversely, if you want
to valide the most usual contacts, american stations, and other English
spoken big DXCC (VK, G, etc) or big DX-peditions, this procedure should be
useful.

Thierry
ON4SKY
http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry


"Bob 9V1GO" wrote in message
...

I recently updated my LoTW for both 9V1GO and G4VGO. Only 240+ hits for
7,900 QSO's for G4VGO, and thirty or so hits for 9V1GO (2K Q's uploaded).
Is anyone using this service? It makes contest QSLing easy, and saves the
direct QSL hassle if you are in a place nobody operates the lower bands

(who

QSLs at least).

Anyway, if you worked 9V1GO, your card is in the server.

73

Bob 9V1GO G4VGO

PS-Direct is OK also, turnaround is about three days when it gets here.

I'm at a 10% hit rate . Of the 11700 QSOs I uploaded, I've had 1180
confirmed.

I've noticed the QSLs I got were mainly from CW and RTTY ops.

My guess is that these ops use computer logging. The SSB guys are not
? They still log by hand?

Who's old fashioned then ?

ha ha

Stef VE2 OWL

By the way, the count is increasing every day.

I've got about 48 countries confirmed.

I've yet to confirm all states: still missing DE, OR, WY
And in Canada, NF, NS, PE, SK and NWT

Yes Bob I am using it and have similar hit rate.
Jim, VK3DBQ
"Bob 9V1GO" wrote in message
...
I recently updated my LoTW for both 9V1GO and G4VGO. Only 240+ hits for
7,900 QSO's for G4VGO, and thirty or so hits for 9V1GO (2K Q's uploaded).
Is anyone using this service? It makes contest QSLing easy, and saves the
direct QSL hassle if you are in a place nobody operates the lower bands
(who
QSLs at least).

Anyway, if you worked 9V1GO, your card is in the server.

73

Bob 9V1GO G4VGO

PS-Direct is OK also, turnaround is about three days when it gets here.

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:32:01 +0800, "Bob 9V1GO"
wrote:

|I recently updated my LoTW for both 9V1GO and G4VGO. Only 240+ hits for
|7,900 QSO's for G4VGO, and thirty or so hits for 9V1GO (2K Q's uploaded).
|Is anyone using this service? It makes contest QSLing easy, and saves the
|direct QSL hassle if you are in a place nobody operates the lower bands (who
|QSLs at least).
|
|Anyway, if you worked 9V1GO, your card is in the server.

I've uploaded 7300 Q's. (All I have in my computerized log)

168 hits in lotw.

Wes N7WS