Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Hampton wrote:
... stuff deleted ... I suspect that BPL will go the same route; they'll try, perhaps, but it will be in the cities and suburbs where they can make money (and they will have competition *and* cause a lot of qrm). The low population density areas will *still* not be served (except by satellite or, perhaps, dial-up). I agree with this, except that a satellite link has too much latency to support VPN, so some of us rural folk are still stuck with only dialup (and I$DN). There is an outfit in town that's putting up terrestrial microwave links in the area, but they claim the County is stalling on the approval for the tower they need to service my area. Grrrr! I give BPL little chance of success in my neighborhood - the PG&E lines around here generate so much hash that it would never fly. Had PG&E come out once to look at it aan it went away for awhile, but now that the hot weather's back so's the noise. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA 73, L |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #657 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #657 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #655 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #655 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 Â April 2, 2004 | Dx |