Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 28th 04, 03:50 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KØHB" wrote

While GWB calls for relaxing Part 15.....

There needs to be technical standards to make
possible new broadband technologies, such as the use of
high-speed communication directly over power lines. Power lines
were for electricity; power lines can be used for broadband
technology. So the technical standards need to be changed to
encourage that.


.....the NTIAyesterday (4/27/2004) released a paper which argues
AGAINST relaxing Part 15 (see below). Full NTIA report at
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fcc...bpl/index.html


"Critical review of the assumptions underlying these analyses
revealed that application of existing Part 15 compliance
measurement procedures for BPL systems results in a significant
underestimation of peak field strength. Underestimation of the
actual peak field strength is the leading contributor to high
interference risks. As applied in current practice to BPL
systems, Part 15 measurement guidelines do not address unique
physical and electromagnetic characteristics of BPL radiated
emissions. Refining compliance measurement procedures for BPL
systems will not impede implementation of BPL technology because
BPL networks reportedly can be successfully implemented under
existing field strength limits.

"Accordingly, NTIA does NOT recommend that the FCC relax Part 15
field strength limits for BPL systems. Further based on studies
to date, NTIA recommends several "access" BPL compliance
measurement provisions that derive from existing Part 15
measurement guidelines. Among these are requirements to: use
measurement antenna heights near the height of power lines;
measure at a uniform distance of ten (10) meters from the BPL
device and power lines; and measure using a calibrated rod
antenna or a loop antenna in connection with appropriate factors
relating magnetic and electric field strength levels at
frequencies below 30 MHz."

Sunuvagun,

de Hans, K0HB



  #2   Report Post  
Old April 28th 04, 04:06 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

GWB said:

And if you're living out in -- I should -- I was going to
say Crawford, Texas, but it's not -- maybe not nearly as
remote. (Laughter.) How about Terlingua, Texas?


Hey, I've been through Terlingua. It's a ghost town outside the
west gate of Big Bend National Park near the XE border. They're
welcome to BPL!

73, de Hans, K0HB




  #3   Report Post  
Old April 28th 04, 04:06 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

GWB said:

And if you're living out in -- I should -- I was going to
say Crawford, Texas, but it's not -- maybe not nearly as
remote. (Laughter.) How about Terlingua, Texas?


Hey, I've been through Terlingua. It's a ghost town outside the
west gate of Big Bend National Park near the XE border. They're
welcome to BPL!

73, de Hans, K0HB




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #657 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 4 April 21st 04 11:21 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #657 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 April 18th 04 09:10 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #655 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 April 4th 04 07:55 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #655 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 April 4th 04 07:55 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 ­ April 2, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 April 4th 04 01:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017